PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: December 4, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Robert Mccoppin
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that residents of a western Chicago subdivision are irritated that a trucking operation moved in next door where before there was only a cornfield. County officials hired sound engineers to test noise from the site, and found that the business was not meeting noise limits. The matter is now in court, and the business owners note that they have already spent $30,000 on a gravel lot and fence to move trucks away from residents.
The article reports that residents of a western Chicago subdivision are irritated that a trucking operation moved in next door where before there was only a cornfield. Residents say the noise is substantial, but the business owners note that they have already spent $30,000 on a gravel lot and fence to move trucks away from residents. The owners also say they are willing to split the cost of a $50,000 wound barrier with the subdivision.
The article notes that the business was built on county land that was zones industrial, although it borders residential city land. County officials hired sound engineers to test noise from the site, and found that the business was not meeting noise limits. The matter is now in court.
PUBLICATION: Gloucestershire Echo
DATE: December 4, 1999
SECTION: News: Ents, Pg.9
DATELINE: Gloucestershire, United Kingdom
The Gloucestershire Echo reports that the Greenbelt Festival plans to return to Gloucestershire, U.K. next year, and officials say noise will be better monitored.
The article reports that the Greenbelt Festival, held in Gloucestershire, U.K. this summer, plans to return next year. Since the festival generated 17 complaints regarding noise -- despite council restrictions that included prohibition of amplified music or outside events after 11 p.m. -- officials and residents want better noise controls next year.
PUBLICATION: The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News
DATE: December 4, 1999
SECTION: Letters To The Editor; Pg. A8
BYLINE: Frank M. Chrystal
DATELINE: Stuart, Florida
The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News prints a letter to the editor that questions the validity of a noise study at Witham Field near Stuart, Florida.
"Editor:
It was obvious the jet pilots were on their best behavior on Thanksgiving weekend. Instead of the normal pedal to the metal, they were walking on eggshells. I was at the Martin County Golf Course twice a day on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. My kids are hooked! My 11-year-old asked, "Why are the big jets not as noisy?"
As I watched the jets all weekend, the pattern was the same; full power at takeoff and then back off the throttle just as they reached the golf course, at which point they sounded like they were landing instead of taking off. Without gaining any more altitude, they would limp off into the distance making me wonder if this type of takeoff was as safe as their normal full throttle.
The Witham Field noise study this past weekend is flawed at best for three reasons.
The pilots knew they were being monitored.
There was a 10-15 m.p.h. east headwind which allowed for less power at takeoff.
The volume of jet traffic was noticeably less than any busy weekend last winter.
The only way to get valid data about our noise problem is to do the noise testing without the pilots knowing about it. The testing also needs to be done under various wind conditions (try dead calm).
Commissioners, please help. We don't need noise studies to tell us we have a noise problem. Look at the map and notice a growing airport in the center of one of the nicest communities in the county. Something has to give."
PUBLICATION: Western Morning News
DATE: December 4, 1999
SECTION: Pg.19
DATELINE: Exeter, United Kingdom
The Western Morning News reports that a motoring organization has officially complained that the A30 in Exeter, U.K. is too noisy. Residents along the road have already been campaigning for a resurfacing of the road.
The article reports that a motoring organization has officially complained that the A30 in Exeter, U.K. is too noisy. They say that noise from the concrete surface causes people to believe they have car problems. They also say that it is distracting and annoying. Residents along the road have already been campaigning for a resurfacing of the road, since they hear the road noise even when in their homes.
PUBLICATION: Aberdeen Press and Journal
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: Aberdeen City Council: Planning, Pg.3
BYLINE: David Steele
DATELINE: Aberdeen, United Kingdom
The Aberdeen Press and Journal reports that the Aberdeen city council rejected a housing development proposal that would have placed residences near a noisy granite firm in an industrial area.
The article reports that the Aberdeen city council rejected a housing development proposal that would have placed residences near a noisy granite firm in an industrial area. Councillors heard objections from residents and the granite company, and decided to reject the proposal to protect the "dying" granite industry in the city from noise-based attacks that could close it down.
PUBLICATION: Bath Chronicle
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.5
BYLINE: Andrew Johnson
DATELINE: Bath, United Kingdom
The Bath Chronicle reports that a bus terminal in Bath, U.K. will expand its 134-bus facility by 16 spots. Neighbors have been complaining about noise from constantly-idling buses and maintenance since the terminal opened in July. Local officials say noise shouldn't get worse.
The article reports that a bus terminal in Bath, U.K. will expand its 134-bus facility by 16 spots. Neighbors have been complaining about noise from constantly-idling buses and maintenance since the terminal opened in July. Local officials have approved the expansion, saying " it is not expected that this proposal will add any unacceptable noise levels to the use already approved in Phase One." It will need to be proven that the noise limits specified for Phase One have been met in the first place.
The article notes that the project will include"acoustic screening, lighting and landscaping," which should keep noise at existing levels. Other locations were considered for the additional spaces, but none of them could handle buses with current road widths.
PUBLICATION: Birmingham Evening Mail
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 7
BYLINE: Zoe Chamberlain
DATELINE: Birmingham, United Kingdom
The Birmingham Evening Mail reports that after giving a warning to a 17-year-old noise offender back in July, police seized stereo equipment and CDs from the noise-offenders house after continued complaints.
The article reports that after giving a warning to a 17-year-old noise offender back in July, police seized stereo equipment and CDs from the noise-offenders house after continued complaints. Police were prepared to force entry, had the youth not let them in. In 28 days, the youth will be reassessed; at that point the equipment will be returned or if the youth has been a further nuisance will have to go to court.
PUBLICATION: Copley News Service
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
BYLINE: Susan Un
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Copley News Service reports that at the National League of Cities convention in Los Angeles, there was a seminar -- arranged by National Organization to Insure a Sound-Controlled Environment (NOISE) -- designed to help local officials from across the country share problems and ideas they've encountered when trying to reduce airport noise.
The article reports that at the National League of Cities convention in Los Angeles, there was a seminar -- arranged by National Organization to Insure a Sound-Controlled Environment (NOISE) -- designed to help local officials from across the country share problems and ideas they've encountered when trying to reduce airport noise. One main discussion topic was how to deal with increased air traffic at Los Angeles International Airport; one local official wants to use nearby smaller airports for overflow, and another person agreed that although "there is an abundance of airports [nationwide], airlines don't use them because it is cheaper to operate a hub than fly their planes from two or three smaller airports."
The article notes that attendants ranged from staunch supporters of airport expansion to those concerned with increased noise in their communities.
PUBLICATION: Evening Herald
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: Pg.3
DATELINE: Plymouth, United Kingdom
The Evening Herald reports that residents in Plymouth, U.K. want the cut-off time for the annual Music of the Night spectacular to be moved back to 10:30 p.m. After a meeting between residents, event organizers, and local officials no agreement was reached. As it stands, the event will end by 11:30 p.m.
The article reports that residents in Plymouth, U.K. want the cut-off time for the annual Music of the Night spectacular to be moved back to 10:30 p.m. Some residents live within 100 yards of the fireworks display and hear fireworks debris falling on their roofs. They also say that children are terrified of the gunfire that is part of the closing "1812 Overture" performance.
The article notes that after a meeting between residents, event organizers, and local officials no agreement was reached. As it stands, the event will end by 11:30 p.m., but residents say that people returning home will still keep them up past midnight.
PUBLICATION: Hull Daily Mail
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: News;Business;Manufacturing, Pg.17
BYLINE: Angus Young
DATELINE: Hull, United Kingdom
The Hull Daily Mail reports that the city council of Hull, U.K. has approved the construction of a new chimney at and increased production at a local chemical plant. The council approved the plant's plans after the plant has said noise will not increase. The plant has pinpointed six cooling towers that are responsible for most of the current noise, and promise to keep working towards a reduction in noise levels.
The article reports that the city council of Hull, U.K. has approved the construction of a new chimney at and increased production at a local chemical plant. Residents have complained -- through a 199-name petition and 66 letters -- that they must already keep their windows shut from the noise.
The article notes that the council approved the plant's plans, since the plant has said the new construction will not increase noise. The plant has pinpointed six cooling towers that are responsible for most of the noise, and promise to keep working towards a reduction in noise levels. At least one council members said he thought the council should have insisted on more noise reduction before construction was approved.
PUBLICATION: Orange County Register
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: Local News; Pg. B01
BYLINE: Mai Tran
DATELINE: Garden Grove, California
The Orange County Register reports that a mosque in Garden Grove, California received preliminary approval to double the size of their current building. Residents say that the noise from 5 daily prayers is already too much to take. Officials say the expansion will help accommodate more people inside, reducing the need for outdoor speakers
The article reports that a mosque in Garden Grove, California received preliminary approval to double the size of their current building. Residents say that the noise from 5 daily prayers is already too much to take.
The article notes that mosque officials say the expansion will help accommodate more people inside, reducing the need for outdoor speakers now required for worshipers who can't be accommodated in the building. Formal approval should come next week.
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: Opinion Pg. B-9:1,7,8; B-11:2; B-13:3
BYLINE: Shirley Horton, mayor of Chula Vista
DATELINE: Chula Vista, California
The San Diego Union-Tribune prints a statement by Chula Vista, California's Mayor in response to criticism of the city council's cautious position on expansion at Brown Field. Chula Vista is attempting to create a job-housing balanced community by adhering to a policy of business-friendly "smart growth," and is cautious about questionable data in the airport's environmental impact statement.
The article prints a statement by Chula Vista, California's Mayor in response to criticism of the city council's cautious position on expansion at Brown Field. The mayor notes that airport officials' claims of low noise impacts do not correspond with data from an environmental impact report, and that those same officials acknowledge some flaws in the report.
The article notes that Chula Vista is attempting to create a job-housing balanced community by adhering to a policy of business-friendly "smart growth."
PUBLICATION: Sarasota Herald-Tribune
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: A Section, Pg. 16A
DATELINE: Manatee County, Florida
The Sarasota Herald-Tribune reports that after a months-long effort to reduce noise from airboats on Manatee County, Florida waterways, county commissioners resorted to an outright ban of the craft on most waterways; the Intracoastal waterway will have certain areas designated for airboat use. The column's author praises the decision, saying that residents and wildlife on the waterways deserve some quiet.
The columnist notes that although fishermen and tour guides who operate the boats have said that the law is an example of meddling with tradition, "the tradition of peace and quiet dates back quite a ways too." The columnist does say that if airboat operators can show a substantial noise reduction without the ban, commissioners should reconsider; also, it is noted that commissioners should be careful of endangering the livelihood of airboat operators.
PUBLICATION: Sebastian Sun
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: A Section; Pg. A12
DATELINE: Sebastian, Florida
The Sebastian Sun reports that the Sebastian, Florida police visited a recent rodeo to ask that the music be turned down. Rodeo officials say that other festivals aren't harassed because of noise, but police said amplified bass and volume made the rodeo louder than other festivals. The city is considering reinstituting a policy of issuing permits that designate how long and loud an event can be.
The article reports that the Sebastian, Florida police visited a recent rodeo to ask that the music be turned down. Rodeo officials say that other festivals aren't harassed because of noise, but police said amplified bass and volume made the rodeo louder than other festivals.
The article notes that if police have to visit a noisy event a second time, they issue a written notice requiring appearance in court. Police say that rodeo organizers have agreed to place speakers on the ground instead of in pickup trucks to prevent the noise from carrying as much. The city is considering reinstituting a policy of issuing permits that designate how long and loud an event can be.
PUBLICATION: South Wales Evening Post
DATE: December 3, 1999
SECTION: Environment: Pollution, Pg.25
DATELINE: Swansea, Wales
The South Wales Evening Post reports that the government of Wales has transferred the power to enforce industrial noise limits to the Environment Agency, meaning that local councils no longer have the power to enforce noise laws when it comes to industrial noise.
The article reports that the government of Wales has transferred the power to enforce industrial noise limits to the Environment Agency, meaning that local councils no longer have the power to enforce noise laws when it comes to industrial noise. The Swansea, Wales city council warned residents that although it may be able to help with complaints such as barking dogs it can no longer regulate industrial noise.
PUBLICATION: The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: Citylife Atlanta (Extra); Pg. 1Jd
BYLINE: H.m. Cauley
DATELINE: Atlanta, Georgia
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution reports that a series of 35-foot tall duplexes, constructed to house students from Georgia Tech and Georgia State, annoy many residents of Atlanta. Residents complain about parking issues, trash and noise. City officials are working to enforce parking and noise restrictions more stringently, and to change zoning that allows duplexes.
The article reports that a series of 35-foot tall duplexes, constructed to house students from Georgia Tech and Georgia State, annoy many residents of Atlanta. Residents say that the houses are "cheaply constructed, and at 35 feet high, they loom over the neighborhood.... Then you get the trash and the cars [sometimes parked on lawns,] and they look worse." Residents also complain about noise.
The article notes that city officials are working to enforce parking and noise restrictions more stringently, and to change zoning that allows duplexes. They also want landlords -- who often live away from their properties -- to become more responsible for what goes on at their rental units.
PUBLICATION: Business Wire
DATE: December 2, 1999
DATELINE: Boston, Massachusetts
Business Wire reports that the Box Pond Association in Bellingham, Massachusetts has settled a dispute with American National Power over a proposed power plant after the company agreed to reduce pollution and noise.
The article reports that the Box Pond Association in Bellingham, Massachusetts has settled a dispute with American National Power over a proposed power plant. The deal comes after the power company agreed to implement several environmental technologies including zero-ammonia technology and silent steam blow technology. The measures will reduce pollution and noise.
PUBLICATION: The Columbian
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: Neighbors; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Thomas Ryll
DATELINE: Vancouver, Washington
The Columbian reports that a Vancouver, Washington resident claims that the Department of Transportation (DOT) falsely told him that his house was a prime candidate for a noise wall. Now they say that the wall couldn't have been erected because it was too close to a wetland, and because a stream -- requiring a break in the wall -- would have rendered it useless anyway. In the meantime, a second off-ramp has been built in its place.
The article reports that a Vancouver, Washington resident claims that the Department of Transportation (DOT) falsely told him that his house was a prime candidate for a noise wall. He had asked about the wall when he bought the house several years ago. Now, the DOT says that a wall can not be built, and has constructed a second off-ramp in the place it would have been erected.
The article notes that although a DOT official wrote a letter admitting it should have held an open house to explain why the noise wall could not be erected, they admit no legal flaw in the process. They say that the wall couldn't have been erected because it was too close to a wetland, and because a stream -- requiring a break in the wall -- would have rendered it useless anyway. Also, they say that the noise levels at the house are barely more than the maximum allowed, and the wall would be $1-million too expensive.
The article goes on to say that the homeowner's lawyer argues that without the construction of the offramp, there would have been room for a noise wall. They also say that several procedural details required of the DOT in such a situation were violated; in particular, they say that a "declaration of nonsignificance -- which are written and self-approved by agencies [to show] that far more detailed environmental impact statements are not necessary" -- was inappropriately approved. Although the homeowner claims he received verbal assurance that his home was a good candidate for a wall, he has nothing in writing.
PUBLICATION: The Courier-Journal
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: News Pg.02b
DATELINE: Louisville, Kentucky
The Courier-Journal reports that Owensboro, Kentucky police have used the new local noise ordinance against 8 individuals with loud car stereos.
The article reports that Owensboro, Kentucky police have been using the new local noise ordinance against those with loud car stereos. Since the law was introduced in early November, eight tickets have been issued to individuals between 18 and 22. The ordinance prohibits music from being audible at 50 feet away.
PUBLICATION: Daily News
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: Suburban; Pg. 1
DATELINE: Westchester, New York
The Daily News reports that a public workshop is being held to hear comments from some of the 700 residents who lives closest to noise from the Westchester County Airport in Westchester, New York.
The article reports that a public workshop is being held for the nearly 700 residents closest to the Westchester County Airport in Westchester, New York. The workshop is designed to gather opinions from the residents to help reduce aircraft noise from the airport. 14 noise monitors are located within a six mile radius of the airport, and one thing that may come out of the workshop are suggestions for better monitor locations.
PUBLICATION: The News Tribune
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: Pg. B1
BYLINE: Kris Sherman
DATELINE: Gig Harbor, Washington
The News Tribune reports that several Gig Harbor, Washington attended by 75, residents spoke angrily about increased noise at a public meeting over a second Narrows Bridge. Transportation officials say the bridge is necessary to help relieve congestion and improve safety, but residents say the six noise walls planned will not help enough people.
The article reports that several Gig Harbor, Washington attended by 75, residents spoke angrily about increased noise at a public meeting over a second Narrows Bridge. One resident asked for the environmental impact statement in progress, claiming that the 30-day comment period allowed after the statement was completed wasn't enough; officials refused.
The article notes that transportation officials believe the bridge is necessary to help relieve congestion and improve safety on "one of the nastiest stretches of highway in the state." Residents don't disagree, but say the six noise walls planned for the $350-million project will not help enough people along the 3.4-mile stretch of road.
PUBLICATION: The Press Enterprise
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B01
BYLINE: Jeremy Berzon
DATELINE: Yucaipa, California
The Press-Enterprise reports that a proposed water-treatement plant in Yucaipa, California has residents worried about noise, odor, wildlife habitat and property values. Officials say that none of those problems will occur.
The article reports that a proposed water-treatement plant in Yucaipa, California has residents worried about noise, odor, wildlife habitat and property values. Officials say that none of those problems will occur. The city council has already approved the purchase of the land.
The article notes that the plant will be able to treat 7 million gallons of water a day. Some of the water to be treated will be piped in from the north of the state. A public forum is planned for later this month.
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: Largo TIMES; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Deborah O'Neil
DATELINE: Dunedin, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times reports that a resident in Dunedin, Florida, whose proposal to build an eight foot wall beside his house to block noise, light and trespassers was rejected, has found a loophole that allows him to build a similar wall by moving his front door. The homeowner says that the wall is necessary because the long-vacant property has become a common place for people to watch the sunset and would otherwise have trespassing problems. Neighbors were against the plan because they say it would ruin the beauty of the neighborhood.
The article reports that a resident in Dunedin, Florida, whose proposal to build an eight foot wall beside his house to block noise, light and trespassers was rejected, has found a loophole that allows him to build a similar wall. By moving his front door to the other side of the house, he will be allowed to build a six foot wall all around the house; he will plant evergreens atop the wall to create an 8-foot barrier.
The article notes that neighbors were against the plan because they say it would ruin the beauty of the neighborhood. The homeowner says that the wall is necessary because the long-vacant property has become a common place for people to watch the sunset and would otherwise have trespassing problems. City officials are expecting complaints from residents, and don't crave the task of explaining the loophole.
PUBLICATION: Star Tribune
DATE: December 2, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 31A
BYLINE: Marsha Hunter
DATELINE: St. Paul, Minnesota
The Star Tribune prints a letter to the editor from a pilot/musician who believes the current site selected for the Minnesota Orchestra's amphitheater is too close to a crucial air-navigation landmark to avoid jet noise.
"Now that the proposed Minnesota Orchestra amphitheater project is grappling with noise issues, it is time to consider the potential problems with noise from the skies overhead. As a professional classical musician who has performed with the Minnesota Orchestra, and as a pilot, I may have a unique perspective on the proposed amphitheater in Brooklyn Park. The site for the amphitheater is nine blocks from a crucial aviation navigational point for the Twin Cities area. That navigational point is a VOR, or very high frequency omnidirectional radio navigation aid. This particular VOR is called GOPHR, or as pilots and air traffic controllers refer to it, "Gopher." VORs emit radio signals that allow pilots to navigate with precision, act as reporting points for certain procedures, and keep pilots and controllers aware of an aircraft's position. Pilots use instruments in the cockpit to tell them where they are in relation to the VOR; controllers look on radar screens to locate aircraft in relation to the VOR. Lots of pilots use the Gopher VOR from distances of 40 and more miles away. But mostly, pilots fly directly over Gopher in order to approach and depart from the Anoka and Crystal airports, and to report to Minneapolis approach control for sequencing into Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. For those maneuvers, pilots must fly precisely over the Gopher VOR, nine blocks from the amphitheater, in good weather and bad. Some airplanes fly over Gopher at about 1,500 feet above ground level. Large commercial jets fly at higher altitudes. Gopher has been at this location for a long time, and becomes more important as air traffic levels increase dramatically into the 21st century. As traffic levels increase, reliever airports like Crystal and Anoka become more important pieces in the overall Twin Cities aviation puzzle. These airports keep air traffic away from congested Minneapolis-St. Paul International. All types of aircraft use Gopher for navigation, from small, single-engine aircraft to passenger jets. Gopher guides airplanes directly to the runways of Anoka and Crystal airports. Gopher routes airplanes directly across the amphitheater site to Crystal airport. Pilots use Gopher for actual instrument approaches, and for practice approaches, flying day and night. Have the Minnesota Orchestra and the supporters of the Brooklyn Park amphitheater realistically considered this issue? Airplane noise isn't a factor for loud, amplified concerts. Aircraft engines can't compete with the ear-shattering decibels on the ground at most modern pop concerts. But what about when the orchestra is playing? How will patrons feel about listening to Barber's "Adagio for Strings and Cessnas"? How will Maestro Eji Oue feel about conducting Bartok's "Music for Strings, Percussion, and Learjet"? How will the orchestra feel about playing Beethoven's "Double Concerto for Violin and Gulfstream"? My first professional job as an opera singer was in 1975 at Wolf Trap Farm Park for the Performing Arts in Virginia. Wolf Trap is a fabulous outdoor amphitheater with beautiful acoustics, a large stage, and ample lawn seating for thousands. It is also in the approach and departure path for Dulles International Airport outside of Washington, D.C. .
A lost aria One night, when my colleagues and I had the night off from rehearsals, we attended a performance of the Metropolitan Opera. We sat on the lawn, under the stars, on a perfect summer night. The opera was "Cavalleria Rusticana." As the harp began the introduction to the tenor's first big aria, distant jet noise began to encroach on the sound. By the time the introduction was over and the tenor had opened his mouth to sing, the jet was close enough to obscure all sound coming from the stage. We watched, amused and amazed, as the tenor mouthed the words. The next musical sound we heard was the postlude to the aria! We hadn't heard one note! The jet had taken exactly the time required for the aria to pass over Wolf Trap on its climbout from Dulles. Poor tenor; he got stabbed at the end of the evening, too. I want an amphitheater. I'm a classical music lover. I'm a subscriber to the St. Paul Chamber Orchestra, and travel to hear great music in other cities here and abroad. I'd like to see a summer venue in the Twin Cities to rival Ravinia and Tanglewood. But I also want good pilots. When I'm a passenger flying on a commercial carrier into Minneapolis-St. Paul in a blizzard, I want the pilots flying to have thousands of instrument approaches under their belts. I want a perfect approach that comes from diligent practice. Future airline pilots are using the Gopher VOR for exactly that training. Typically, developments around airports proceed, and then later, after everything is built, users of the developments begin to complain about airplane noise. The Minnesota Orchestra should be forewarned in this case. Airplane noise and classical music will have to coexist. After all, passengers in those jets overhead may be listening to the Minnesota Orchestra on one of Northwest Airlines' music channels."
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State and Local Wire
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: San Francisco, California
The Associated Press State and Local Wire reports that an attempt by the Mercury News in San Francisco, California to force the city to release names of noise complainants has failed. The court ruled that the city was justified in keeping the names secret because releasing the names could lead to harassment of complainants and could make residents more reluctant to complain in the future. The newspaper claimed that complainants names should be released according to the Public Records Act.
The article reports that an attempt by the Mercury News in San Francisco, California to force the city to release names of noise complainants has failed. The state Supreme Court ruled that the city was justified in keeping the names secret because releasing the names could lead to harassment of complainants and could make residents more reluctant to complain in the future.
The article notes that the newspaper claims that the public has a right to know how well the city followed up with complaints, and so complainants names should be released according to the Public Records Act. The newspaper won in county court, but lost two subsequent appeals.
PUBLICATION: Bath Chronicle
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.12
BYLINE: Andrew Johnson
DATELINE: Bath, United Kingdom
The Bath Chronicle reports that several pubs in Bath, U.K. have applied for a live music license, amid differing neighbors' opinions.
The article reports that several pubs in Bath, U.K. have applied for a live music license. Letters of opposition and support have been sent to the local council. The music will be ended by 11 p.m. even on weekends.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N3
BYLINE: Jesse Hiestand
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that several state legislators organized a meeting -- which included anti-noise activists and airport representatives -- to discuss ways to curb noise at Van Nuys Airport in California. State officials are considering better enforcement of state laws, research into other city's approaches to noise reduction, and tax incentives for quieter jets.
The article reports that several state legislators organized a meeting -- which included anti-noise activists and airport representatives -- to discuss ways to curb noise at Van Nuys Airport in California. City and County officials have been trying for several years to tackle the issue, but have been unsuccessful.
The article notes that the city finally drafted an ordinance to reduce noise at the airport after ten years of work, but neither anti-noise activists nor airport proponents are happy with it. State officials are considering better enforcement of state laws, possible amendment of some laws, research into other city's approaches to noise reduction, and "tax incentives for jet owners willing to upgrade from noisy Stage 2 jets to newer, quieter - although more expensive - Stage 3 jets."
PUBLICATION: Derby Evening Telegraph
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Business: Companies - Rolls-Royce Aero Engines, Pg.10
BYLINE: Kevin Palmer
DATELINE: Southampton, United Kingdom
The Derby Evening Telegraph reports that Rolls Royce will invest 1.6 million pounds in a new technology center at the University of Southampton in the U.K. to reduce noise from aircraft engines.
The article reports that Rolls Royce will invest 1.6 million pounds in a new technology center at the University of Southampton's Institute of Sound and Vibration Research (ISVR) in the U.K. Research there will center on reducing the noise from aircraft engines.
The article notes that Rolls Royce is "one of 32 organisations from nine European countries in a programme that aims to reduce aircraft noise by six decibels by 2005."
PUBLICATION: Governing Magazine
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Letters;Pg. 10
BYLINE: Eric M. Zwerling, Director Noise Technical Assistance Center Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey
DATELINE: United States
Governing Magazine prints a letter from a noise expert at Rutgers University in New Jersey who says that Rutgers University has a 35-year-old Noise Technical Assistance Center that help "municipalities draft ordinances that are clear, precise, enforceable and tailored to the specific needs of the jurisdiction," as well as offering training for noise enforcement officers.
"NOISE RELIEF
Noise is a serious quality-of-life issue, and it was great to see "Battle of the Boombox" (October) bring the issue to the forefront. The article incorrectly stated, however, that "towns are essentially on their own" with the closing of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Noise Abatement and Control. The Rutgers Noise Technical Assistance Center has been helping municipalities, as well as individuals and private entities, with their noise problems for 35 years. We were, in fact, consulted extensively in the writing of the article.
We help municipalities draft ordinances that are clear, precise, enforceable and tailored to the specific needs of the jurisdiction. These ordinances have been tested in state and federal courts. We offer certification training for enforcement officers so that they are comfortable with the technology, techniques and strategies of sound-level measurement for enforcement purposes, and teach them how to present and defend their measurements in court.
I must also note that very few jurisdictions need a $5,000 sound-level meter as described in the article. The vast majority can use an entry-level meter that will cost approximately $750. It is important that we not give agencies sticker shock."
PUBLICATION: The Guardian
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Guardian Society Pages; Pg. 2
DATELINE: United Kingdom
The Guardian reports that noise pollution seems to be growing in the United Kingdom, in forms including unwanted muzak. Noise complaints have increased by over 25 times from 1971 to 1996. Noise may intensify many health problems. Some politicians want to ban piped-in music in public places where people can't escape the noise, such as in hospitals.
The article reports that noise pollution seems to be growing in the United Kingdom, in forms including unwanted muzak. The paper interviews the head of an anti-muzak organization called Pipedown, who sites an airport survey showing "that 43% of its 68,077 respondents disliked its piped music; only 34% liked it and the rest didn't care."
The article notes that Pipedown gives supporters "calling cards" with messages such as "I left your establishment without buying anything simply because of the piped music." Another study by the Building Research Establishment showed that 30% of its respondents felt that environmental noise spoiled their home life to some extent. Noise complaints have increased by over 25 times from 1971 to 1996.
The article goes on to say that noise may intensify "hearing problems and raise stress levels to affect heart rate, blood pressure, eye conditions, muscle tension, cholesterol levels and hormone secretion.... It also impairs concentration, and can induce 'neural hijack' states that result in suicide and homicide. Anti- noise campaigners reckon it causes about 10 deaths by crime a year."
The article notes that in 1996 the Noise Act was passed to allow localities to have more power in enforcing noise laws, but only 10 localities have reported that they plan to implement the Act. It also says that noise complainants are treated much like cigarette-smoke complainants were treated years ago: with contempt. Some politicians want to ban piped-in music in public places where people can't escape the noise, such as in hospitals.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Gary Polakovic
DATELINE: Casitas Springs, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that round-the-clock construction on a dam in Casitas Springs, California is causing noise that is disturbing residents. The project was supposed to include a network of flood-warning sirens along the river to give residents time to evacuate in the case of a dam failure, but the local fire marshall is upset that the network is not fully in place. Work crews have installed several measures that will reduce the danger of a wall of water: "wells that suck destabilizing water from beneath the dam, and a berm the size of an office building to act as a doorstop to prevent the dam's collapse."
The article reports that round-the-clock construction on a dam in Casitas Springs, California is causing noise that is disturbing residents. The work is needed to quake-proof the dam before winter storms make work impossible. Residents note that a particularly noisy rock-sorter sounds like a "giant, unbalanced washing machine."
The article notes that residents believe noise, dust, and traffic from the project are destroying their quality of life. Environmentalists gained some promises to protect natural resources after the Santa Barbara-based Environmental Defense Center threatened to sue to stop the project; the Center says it may "revisit the issue" since impact appears higher than anticipated.
The article goes on to say that the project was supposed to include a network of flood-warning sirens along the river to give residents time to evacuate in the case of a dam failure, but the local fire marshall is upset that the network is not fully in place.
The article also says that work crews have installed several measures that will reduce the danger of a wall of water: "wells that suck destabilizing water from beneath the dam, and a berm the size of an office building to act as a doorstop to prevent the dam's collapse." Work will slow down in January, and work should be completed in the fall.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Jean O. Pasco
DATELINE: Laguna Woods, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Dave Schlenker, head of Seniors Against the El Toro Airport
The Los Angeles Times reports that residents of Laguna Woods, California are pointing to easements that allowed military flights over their properties as a strike against the proposed airport at El Toro. If the former marines base becomes a commercial airport, the easements will expire and residents will be free to sue the airport for noise pollution and trespassing.
The article reports that residents of Laguna Woods, California are pointing to easements that allowed military flights over their properties as a strike against the proposed airport at El Toro. If the former marines base becomes a commercial airport, the easements will expire and residents will be free to sue the airport for noise pollution and trespassing.
The article notes that the county says that they would still be allowed to fly over the properties. While they could legally fly over the properties without easements, they would risk lawsuits. As one attorney said, "governments should determine the harm to homeowners because of an airport, and then pay them for it. But governments prefer to "simply fly, and then the burden shifts to residents to prove within the first five years of operation that they've been damaged by the airport."
The article goes on to say that the FAA said easements are only recommended in cases where soundproofing has occurred. That way, officials won't face the burden of paying for soundproofing, and then having to pay for a lawsuit.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Patrick Mcgreevy
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that the Los Angeles Police Commission rejected a proposal to move some firearms practice from one firing range to another. Residents at the second facility have complained substantially about the noise, and the Los Angeles Police have recently designated $100,000 for sound-reduction panels there. A council member had proposed that firing range hours at the first facility be reduced gradually, until it was finally closed.
The article reports that the Los Angeles Police Commission rejected a proposal to move some firearms practice from one firing range to another. Residents at the second facility have complained substantially about the noise, and the Los Angeles Police have recently designated $100,000 for sound-reduction panels there. Residents at the first facility say that its local officials aren't brave enough to stand up to pressure, and say that residents around the second facility are getting better treatment.
The article notes that a council member proposed that firing range hours at the first facility be reduced gradually, until it was finally closed. The police department rejected that proposal because officers would be forced to take overtime to get firing range practice, would be forced to drive more than an hour to the second facility, and would get less low-light target practice.
The article goes on to say that target up to 10,000 officers would have been affected by the change.
PUBLICATION: The News and Observer
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Jen Gomez
DATELINE: Durham, North Carolina
The News and Observer reports that a strip club in Durham, North Carolina has been closed while the city prepares a nuisance case against it. Many neighbors seem to think that noise and violence in the area is not the fault of the club. Other residents say they are glad the club is closed, saying its easier to sleep.
The article reports that a strip club in Durham, North Carolina has been closed while the city prepares a nuisance case against it. Complaints of noise and violence near the club over the past few years led the city to take the case to court on behalf of the state.
The article notes that many neighbors seem to think that noise and violence in the area is not the fault of the club. They say the club shouldn't have been closed, even temporarily, while another local club where two men were killed outside in a shooting remains open. Other residents say they are glad the club is closed, saying its easier to sleep.
The article notes that local officials claim to have evidence of prostitution and illegal drug activity at the club.
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. 4B
BYLINE: James F. Sweeney
DATELINE: Olmsted Falls, Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that Olmsted Falls, Ohio residents and officials say that an FAA environmental impact report is faulty and needs revision, and say that the noise consulting firm for the airport has a conflict of interest because it already works for the airport. The airport "wants to build a 9,000-foot northeast-southwest runway at the northern end of the airport and lengthen an existing parallel runway." Olmsted Falls residents say they already get enough noise and pollution from jets, and don't want the expansion to make worse.
The article reports that last night, Olmsted Falls, Ohio residents and officials came to a hearing about Cleveland Hopkins International Airport's proposed expansion armed with a lawyer. They say that an FAA environmental impact report is faulty and needs revision, and say that the noise consulting firm for the airport has a conflict of interest because it already works for the airport. The suburb has threatened to sue if the impact report is not changed.
The article notes that the airport "wants to build a 9,000-foot northeast-southwest runway at the northern end of the airport and lengthen an existing parallel runway." Olmsted Falls residents say they already get enough noise and pollution from jets, and don't want the expansion to make worse. The FAA will consider comments from the hearing before deciding whether to approve the expansion. The plan includes the option of tearing down the International Exposition Center, "but Brook Park is suing to take the property by eminent domain.
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Metro Forum Opinion & Ideas; Pg. 8B
BYLINE: Philmore J. Hart
DATELINE: Cleveland, Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that a resident of Cleveland, Ohio believes -- after traveling to France and observing their noise walls -- that the Ohio Department of Transportation could make their noise walls more effective and just as attractive.
"In reference to the Nov. 14 article on freeway noise walls :
My wife and I recently visited Province and Cote d'Azure in France. We traveled by bus along toll motorways, freeways and some very narrow, tree-lined roads.
Many of the French highways had sound barriers to protect the neighboring homes. Rather than straight, high and ugly precast concrete that line our freeways, the French have tried many variations, including barriers angled approximately 20 degrees away from the highway, glass barriers that allowed views of the countryside and glass alternating with opaque barriers. Other barrier designs varied in depth and were arranged at angles. Almost all the barriers were landscaped with plantings and trees to soften the barrier look. The sum effect for the drivers and residents alike was a pleasant and almost unnoticeable sound barrier without the tunnel effect of our Ohio Department of Transportation's naked, repetitive specials.
I do not know how effective the French sound barriers are in blocking road noise. If the concept of the sound barriers is really to reflect sound rather than to absorb it, then the angling the barriers and varying their depth makes great sense, as sound loses energy while being bounced from surface to surface.
My guess is that the French sound barriers are as effective as ours, but they look and feel much more natural. Rather than the same monotonous, unsightly barriers, we, too, can have varying designs, shapes and, above all, trees and green all along our highways. It would be a pleasant surprise if ODOT would think of the users - both those in vehicles and those living near freeways."
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 1D
BYLINE: Richard C. Dujardin
DATELINE: Providence, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that a combination bookstore and restaurant in Providence, Rhode Island had its license renewed on the condition that it keep the noise down. The owner of the restaurant has fired his manager from the summer, and the new manager has implemented strict closing rules designed to keep the noise down by reducing loitering.
The article reports that a combination bookstore and restaurant in Providence, Rhode Island had its license renewed on the condition that it keep the noise down. A local resident noted that there had been activity as late as 3:15 a.m. in the summer, and noise had often kept her up from bands which had not been permitted by local officials.
The article noted that the owner of the restaurant has fired his manager from the summer, and the new manager has implemented strict closing rules designed to keep the noise down by reducing loitering. The complaining resident acknowledged the improvements.
The article notes that the restaurant was allowed to stay open by promising to keep the noise down, permit all entertainment, and provide their phone numbers to the complaining resident so she could call them with any complaints.
PUBLICATION: The Record
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Opinion; Pg. L10
BYLINE: Les Shenkler
DATELINE: Allendale, New Jersey
The Record prints a letter to the editor from an Allendale, New Jersey resident who says that although the town has the money to enclose a pistol range in the area to reduce noise, it continues to stall construction.
"Recently, several articles detailed how Bogota and Franklin Lakes issued summonses to the railroad company, CSX Corporation, for disturbing the peace.
The summons for violating the borough's noise ordinance was issued despite the fact that the company that operates the railroad is exempt from municipal ordinances under federal interstate commerce law. It seems that freight trains would just park and idle for hours, spew fumes, and create noise. Air quality and noise became so poor residents could not open windows or sit on their porch.
Let's talk about another Bergen County town: Waldwick. Waldwick has an outdoor pistol range adjacent to two children's ball fields.
Despite the fact that Waldwick has obtained $435,000 in state grants and $225,000 from nine municipalities to enclose the range, they continue to take our quality of life away from us! Instead of starting construction, they continue to shoot, they allow a recreational league and a junior (up to age 19) league to shoot there, and they hold pistol competitions every week. This noise is in addition to the noise from the two ball fields.
The state noise code for daytime hours is limited to 65 decibels.
We have decibel readings at our property from the county Department of Health at over 100 decibels for the pistol range alone! Waldwick has the money and the drawings; Waldwick should stop shooting now and start construction."
PUBLICATION: The Santa Fe New Mexica
DATE: December 1, 1999
SECTION: Opine; Pg. A-7
BYLINE: The Santa Fe New Mexica
DATELINE: Santa Fe, New Mexico
The Santa Fe New Mexica prints an editorial asserting that Santa Fe, New Mexico's noise laws don't need to be amended just yet. City Council had originally proposed stiff fines for noise offenders, but clubs representing those with loud car stereos have been voluntarily turning their music down after 10 p.m. This has quieted the council, but house partiers need to do the same or risk overkill restrictions.
The article prints an editorial asserting that Santa Fe, New Mexico's noise laws don't need to be amended just yet. The City Council had originally proposed stiffer fines for noise audible from 25 feet away, including a $500 first-time fine. Clubs representing those with loud car stereos have been voluntarily turning their music down after 10 p.m., causing the council to consider reducing fines and giving first-time warnings.
The article notes that councillors are now worried about noise from loud house parties. The editorial staff notes that partiers should take similar voluntary measures to ease the council's need to implement noise rules.
The article goes on to say that councillors should look at Albuquerque's noise rules for a more sensible template. They say "Does this mean a guy can't whistle while he works or walks down the street? And while they're keeping our streets safe from music, are they to ignore noisy trucks, motorcycles and those infernal leaf-blowers?"
PUBLICATION: Tulsa World
DATE: December 1, 1999
DATELINE: Tulsa, Oklahoma
The Tulsa World reports that the United States is demanding another delay -- this time indefinite -- of anti-hushkit legislation that would require American airlines to use aircraft that comply with Stage-3 noise standards without the assistance of hushkits when in Europe. Officials here say the EU's real motivation is increased revenue for European airlines and manufacturers, not the protection of residents from noise pollution. Postponing the legislation until after newer international standards are due may keep pressure on the U.S. to continue cooperation, although the EU has said that any delay will not be indefinite.
The article reports that the United States is demanding another delay -- this time indefinite -- of anti-hushkit legislation. The legislation, scheduled to take effect in May, would forbid planes that are not European-certified -- the bulk of which are American-built planes -- from using hushkitted Stage-2 aircraft in Europe; instead, American airlines would have to use aircraft that comply with Stage-3 noise standards without the assistance of hushkits.
The article notes that America is demanding an indefinite delay to implementation of the law, which has already been delayed by a year. Congress may retaliate against any implementation by banning the EU's supersonic Concorde from the U.S.; officials here say that the Concorde shows that the EU's real motivation for the ban is increased revenue for European airlines and manufacturers, not the protection of residents from noise pollution.
The article goes on to say that the EU's executive governing body is considering a postponement until after September 2001, the date which is set for the development of newer, international noise standards. The U.S. has promised to cooperate with the development of those standards by the deadline, but EU officials are not convinced. Postponing the legislation until after the international standards are due may keep pressure on the U.S. to continue cooperation. The EU says that any delay will have a timetable, and will not be indefinite as the U.S. demands.
The article mentions that a local Tulsa, Oklahoma company manufactures the $1-million hushkits -- and indeed all hushkit manufacturers are American -- will lose business after the legislation is in place. Another reason for loss of sales is the December, 1999 deadline for compliance of all American aircraft with Stage-3 standards. Nordam, the Tulsa based company, which employs 1,300 people locally, produces 10 hushkits per month; the current backlog would give those employees work for less than a year.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Standard
DATE: November 30, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 8
BYLINE: Monica Porter
DATELINE: Westminster, United Kingdom
The Evening Standard prints a report on a day in the life of a Westminster, London, England Environmental Health Officer. Most of the article is anecdotal, but some statistics regarding noise complaints are revealed.
The article prints a report on a day in the life of a Westminster, London, England Environmental Health Officer. Most of the article is anecdotal, but some facts are revealed. The officer was part of London's best 24-hour noise response team; they receive over 20,000 complaints each year, and may receive 80 on any given weekend day. 2,000 notices are served a year, and if they are ignored sound-systems are often seized.
PUBLICATION: The Hartford Courant
DATE: November 30, 1999
SECTION: Town News; Pg. B3
DATELINE: East Granby, Connecticut
The Hartford Courant reports that a final public meeting will be held in East Granby, Connecticut to discuss flight path changes at Bradley International Airport. Instead of being examined under the current study, certain changes -- which have been identified as likely to increase noise impacts -- will be considered only as part of a larger, more comprehensive Part 150 study already begun.
The article reports that a final public meeting will be held in East Granby, Connecticut to discuss flight path changes at Bradley International Airport. The changes, which are being considered as part of an environmental study, will not include previously proposed changes for Runway 6 which would cause "significant increases of noise levels."
The article notes that instead of being examined under the current study, those Runway 6 changes will be considered only as part of a larger, more comprehensive Part 150 study already begun. That study will consider "steeper climb and descent patterns, and the directions in which outbound planes travel."
PUBLICATION: Hermes Database/Highways Agency
DATE: November 30, 1999
DATELINE: United Kingdom
The Hermes Database/Highways Agency reports that the United Kingdom has introduced a plan called "Towards a Balance with Nature" that aims to protect and improve environmental quality along the nation's highways. "The strategy covers a wide range of issues including air pollution; waste management; noise reduction; water pollution; biodiversity and protecting [the U.K.'s] geological and historical heritage."
The article reports that the United Kingdom has introduced a plan called "Towards a Balance with Nature" that aims to protect and improve environmental quality along the nation's highways. Transportation ministers gave the plan, which is the first in a series of sustainable-development initiatives, to the Highways Agency for implementation. The agency will use more of its 4.1-million pound budget to implement the measures.
The article notes that "the strategy covers a wide range of issues including air pollution; waste management; noise reduction; water pollution; biodiversity and protecting [the U.K.'s] geological and historical heritage." Some specifics include the use of "noise -reducing surfaces when roads need to be resurfaced," identification of "sites for noise mitigation on existing roads," and research of "tire and road noise with the tire industry."
PUBLICATION: New Straits Times
DATE: November 30, 1999
SECTION: Business Aviation; Pg. 36
DATELINE: Malaysia
The New Straits Times reports that the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines, which is made up of airline officials from Asia Pacific, agreed at a meeting in Malaysia that noise standards set out by the International Civil Aviation Organization must be adhered to as growth continues for aviation in the region.
The article reports that the Association of Asia Pacific Airlines, which is made up of airline officials from Asia Pacific, agreed that noise standards set out by the International Civil Aviation Organization must be adhered to as growth continues for aviation in the region. The region is considered the fastest growing aviation market in the world.
The article notes that noise complaints in countries such as Tokyo may force airlines to spend substantial money to quiet their fleets; other Asia Pacific members want to avoid those problems by starting now to quiet their fleets gradually, before they are forced to do it suddenly.
PUBLICATION: The Record
DATE: November 30, 1999
SECTION: News; Three Star B, Also In, Four Star B, Two Star P, One Star B; Pg. L1
BYLINE: Evonne Coutros
DATELINE: Glen Rock, New Jersey
The Record reports that a wine company in Glen Rock, New Jersey is continuing to bother residents with late-night noise even after preliminary attempts to reduce the disturbances. Although the company says it has already undertaken efforts to quiet the noise, it will undertake redesign of its loading dock so noise will be directed away from all neighbors.
The article reports that a wine company in Glen Rock, New Jersey is continuing to bother residents with late-night noise even after preliminary attempts to reduce the disturbances. Trucks have been padded to quiet the stacking of wine cases, and backup beepers have been altered on trucks to be less piercing.
The article notes that although the company says it has already undertaken efforts to quiet the noise, it will undertake redesign of its loading dock so noise will be directed away from all neighbors. The 165,000 square foot operation has hired a noise consultant to help them redesign their loading dock.
PUBLICATION: Scunthorpe Evening Telegraph
DATE: November 30, 1999
SECTION: Pg.12
BYLINE: RJ Green
DATELINE: Messingham, United Kingdom
The Scunthorpe Evening Telegraph prints a letter to the editor that supports a new flying club in Messingham, U.K. The writer notes that grass strips of this type rarely cause noise problems.
"I WRITE to you regarding the proposed Messingham Flying Club.
My family fully supports Mr Chapman's plans for the development of a small flying club near Messingham. This will provide a useful facility for our local pilots and local aviation enthusiasts.
BM Sugdon's comments (November 23) about aircraft noise are nonsense. Bidford Flying Club (as mentioned by Mr Sugdon) is a major BGA Gliding Club but they have very strict noise abatement rules. Quote: 'Failure to comply with these procedures will lead, after three violations, to the withdrawal of the right to fly at Bidford.i
The site is very similar to the Trent Valley Gliding Club, Kirton Lindsey, and flying is tightly controlled by the weather.
The reason Bidford can be busy is due to the fact that a lot of BGA competitions are held at the club in the summer, which wouldn't be the case at Messingham.
If Mr Sugdon visited Bidford during the winter months he would find there is hardly any flying due to poor weather and short days. Messingham Airfield will be a small grass strip for a handful of enthusiasts who just want to enjoy their hobby.
The field is a good distance from any residential area and circuit pattern can easily be controlled to prevent noise.
Like Mr Sugdon, I am also a keen caravanner and regularly stay alongside a grass airstrip near Baxterly, Warwickshire. There are eight light aircraft and a helicopter based at this strip.
It is very rare these aircraft fly during the week as their owners have to go to work to earn lots of money to be able to fly them.
So most of the flying is done during the weekend, weather permitting. It is also very rare these aircraft all fly at once. I can assure you, and the people of Messingham, that noise is not a problem from an airstrip of this nature. And in the unlikely event that it does become a problem there are many ways to remove it. So I hope Mr Chapman goes ahead with is new venture and am sure the majority of Messingham residents won't object to his plans."
PUBLICATION: Star Tribune
DATE: November 30, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Conrad Defiebre
DATELINE: Minneapolis, Minnesota
The Star Tribune reports that workshops in Minneapolis, Minnesota over the next three days will teach residents about possible changes to the insulation program that may allow more homes near Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport to be insulated from noise.
The article reports that workshops in Minneapolis, Minnesota over the next three days will teach residents about possible changes to the insulation program that protects homes near Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport from noise. The threshold of noise that allows homeowners to qualify for insulation may be lowered, allowing thousands more homes to qualify.
PUBLICATION: Business Wire
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Healthwire
DATELINE: Chicago, Nov. 29, 1999
Business Wire reports that Toshiba has introduced an MRI scanner that is 90% quieter than previous models.
The article reports that Toshiba has introduced an MRI scanner that is 90% quieter than previous models. Patients will now receive a noise similar to gentle drumming as opposed to a jet-engine takeoff. Loud noise can sometimes distress patients so much that they must be removed from the scanner before a scan has been completed.
PUBLICATION: The Columbian
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Clark County/Region; Pg. B2
BYLINE: Howard Buck
DATELINE: Vancouver, Washington
The Columbian reports that residents near Seattle, Washington's Sea-Tac Airport are split over a new plan to use a two-tiered flight path system for takeoffs that will increase noise for some residents.
The article reports that residents near Seattle, Washington's Sea-Tac Airport have are split over a new plan to use a two-tiered flight path system for takeoffs. The flight paths will spread noise more evenly between different neighborhoods, but residents who will get more noise are upset. Currently, many of those residents who will get more noise get none.
The article notes that a proposed third runway at the airport will likely add more unhappy residents to the controversy in the near future.
PUBLICATION: Daily Mail
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 37
BYLINE: Richard Gray
DATELINE: Scotland
The Daily Mail reports that a new study, released from the Institute of Hearing Research in Scotland, has noted that the popularity of the personal stereo has increased the number of youths who will have hearing problems early. The researchers are advocating for decibel limits for personal stereos and clubs in Britain.
The article reports that a new study, released from the Institute of Hearing Research in Scotland, has noted that the popularity of the personal stereo has increased the number of youths who will have hearing problems early. "More than 80 per cent of youngsters are suffering from the first signs of deafness," and 20 percent of Scots under 25 are at risk of severely diminished hearing from listening to loud music.
The article notes that the researchers are advocating for decibel limits for personal stereos and clubs in Britain. Stereos used to be kept at lower volumes to prevent distortion, but higher fidelity technology allows for louder music.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Jean O. Pasco
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Mike Stevens, the president of LAX Expansion No!
The Los Angeles Times reports that residents and officials near Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) are pushing for the proposed new airport at El Toro in Orange County. They say that it is only fair for Orange County residents, who send about 12 million passengers a year to LAX, to shoulder some of the aircraft noise burden. Opponents say that LAX and nearby John Wayne Airport should be used to their potential before any new airport is built.
The article reports that residents and officials near Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) are pushing for the proposed new airport at El Toro in Orange County. They say that it is only "environmental justice" for Orange County residents, who send about 12 million passengers a year to LAX, to shoulder some of the aircraft noise burden. They said this, as part of a group called "LAX Expansion No!", to Orange County supervisors at a meeting last week.
The article notes that El Toro opponents say that LAX and nearby John Wayne Airport should be used to their potential before any new airport is built. John Wayne Airport is limited to 8.4 million passengers each year until 2005, but at that point it could handle up to 14 million each year without physical expansion. They admit that sharing the noise is more equitable, but say that adding a new airport when capacity is not maxed-out is irresponsible.
The article notes that a proposed LAX expansion would allow 30 million more passengers to be served each year: the same as the capacity of the proposed El Toro Airport.
The article goes on to say that El Segundo has filed a suit against the city of Los Angeles, claiming that the expansion of LAX from 40 million to 63 million passengers each year, over the past ten years, is a violation of state environmental laws.
PUBLICATION: The Morning Call
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Easton, Pg. B1
BYLINE: Tracy Jordan
DATELINE: Stockertown, Pennsylvania
The Morning Call reports that Stockertown, Pennsylvania officials decided to withdraw the cease and desist order they served to a local polymer company because of complaints about noise, vibrations, traffic and odor. The company said that it believes it could eliminate at least one of two major noise problems, and said they became aware of many of the perceived problems at a recent public hearing.
The article reports that Stockertown, Pennsylvania officials decided to withdraw the cease and desist order they served to a local polymer company because of complaints about noise, vibrations, traffic and odor. Company officials said that they were surprised by the order, although they knew of some complaints. The company said that it believes it could eliminate at least one of two major noise problems, but said that noxious odors and particulate matter -- reported by residents -- were not being caused by them.
The article notes that after the company appealed the order, local officials decided to withdraw the order and hold a public hearing for the 30-40 concerned residents instead. Company officials said they became aware of many of the perceived problems at the hearing itself. Local officials said they would be monitoring the plant carefully for efforts to reduce the noise, and expects progress reports from the company.
PUBLICATION: The Morning Call
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Comment, Pg. A10
BYLINE: Kenneth A. Klicker
DATELINE: Lower Macungie, Pennsylvania
The Morning Call prints a letter from a Lower Macungie, Pennsylvania man who believes that the local Commission is not listening to resident complaints about noise from a new Wal-Mart's construction site.
"To the Editor:
Two of the supervisors of Lower Macungie Township have apparently once again gone out of their way to help Wal-Mart build its shopping center (The Morning Call, Nov. 19). Construction is carried out up until midnight and the noise, vibrations, and bright lights carry into the homes of residents near the job site.
Supervisor Ken DeAngelis proposed a noise ordinance. It was reported that Supervisor William Mayo rejected the ordinance because he represents not these residents but the interests of the other 17,000 residents of the township. It was not explained what Mr. Mayo thought these other 17,000 residents would expect in terms of a noise ordinance if a major construction project was roaring and squeaking along late into the night for months on end next to their homes.
Supervisor Robert Lee rejected the ordinance because it would, for example, prevent emergency and utility electric crews from making an emergency repair at night. It was not explained how Mr. Lee reasons there is a noise nuisance equivalence between an emergency crew making noise for one night and a major construction project pounding along at night next to residents' homes for months. Neither of these supervisors was even willing to schedule a public hearing. What are they afraid the public would say?
A Wal-Mart representative explained that they had to work into the night until April because the project was behind schedule. No one explained why the residents are obliged to suffer this interference in their lives until April so that Wal-Mart can complete their project on time. Why are the needs of Wal-Mart more important than those of the citizens?
In the end, the commissioners are probably right to assume that a noise ordinance would not be effective. If such ordinance was enacted, Wal-Mart would apply for an exemption and their friends at the township building would approve it."
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Karen Farkas
DATELINE: Twinsburg Township, Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that a rock company in Twinsburg Township, Ohio has worked out a schedule with the rail delivery company so loud deliveries will no longer happen at night. he company blamed the rail company -- Norfolk Southern -- for the original schedule problems, saying that the problems arose as it tried to consolidate services with the recently acquired Conrail.
The article reports that a rock company in Twinsburg Township, Ohio has worked out a schedule with the rail delivery company so loud deliveries will no longer happen at night. Residents complained that noise was keeping them up, and a police officer observed unloading from 1 a.m. to 7:50 p.m., at which point he cited the company with disorderly conduct.
The article notes that the company blamed the rail company -- Norfolk Southern -- for the schedule problems, saying that the problems arose as it tried to consolidate services with the recently acquired Conrail.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 3C
BYLINE: Tiffany Bartish
DATELINE: Richmond, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that after complaints over noisy motor bikes in Richmond, Rhode Island, officials are considering an amendment to the zoning ordinance to clarify the definition of a "motorized" bike and "recreational use." The town solicitor said that noise should be covered under the noise ordinance, and the dust -- a private nuisance -- should be covered by filing suit. Local dirt bike course owners say they erected a 12-foot wooden wall to help with noise, and water the track to help with dust.
The article reports that after complaints over noisy motor bikes in Richmond, Rhode Island, officials are considering an amendment to the zoning ordinance. The zoning ordinance already forbids gatherings of more than two motorcycles or dirt bikes, but officials are considering an amendment that would clarify the definition of a "motorized" bike and "recreational use."
The article notes that complainants said they are unable to enjoy their properties because of noise and dust from a nearby dirt bike course. The owners of the course allow many riders to use the course for free; they erected a 12-foot wooden wall to help with noise, and water the track to help with dust.
The article goes on to say that the town solicitor said that the zoning ordinance is not the place to address the issue. He said that noise should be covered under the noise ordinance, and the dust -- a private nuisance -- should be covered by filing suit.
PUBLICATION: The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: Letters To The Editor; Pg. A8
BYLINE: Carmen Fedea
DATELINE: Stuart, Florida
The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News prints a letter to the editor from a Stuart, Florida resident who says that reduction of airport noise should be given higher priority than reduction of noise from industrial sources.
"Editor:
It is very disturbing that Commissioner (Janet) Gettig is so concerned with protecting the citizens who live near Pioneer Tile from noise and pollution, while she ignores us residents who live near the airport. We suffer from the same problems.
Can the commissioner explain why she is trying to shut the tile plant down while allowing the airport to expand? It sounds very hypocritical to me."
PUBLICATION: Western Daily Press
DATE: November 29, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.9
DATELINE: Yeovil, United Kingdom
The Western Daily Press reports that a neighbor of a Yeovil, U.K. bar worries that a late-night entertainment licence -- which the establishment has applied for -- would worsen noise for her and other residents. The local environmental health officer agrees.
The article reports that a neighbor of a Yeovil, U.K. bar worries that a late-night entertainment licence -- which the establishment has applied for -- would worsen noise for her and other residents. The local environmental health officer agrees, but the council has yet to decide on the application.
The article notes that the licence would allow the bar to stay open from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m. Tuesday through Saturday.
PUBLICATION: The Jupiter Courier
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: A Section; Pg. A10
BYLINE: Kevin Hemstock
DATELINE: Jupiter Farms, Florida
The Jupiter Courier reports that residents near Jupiter Farms, Florida are concerned that a proposed speedway in the community would create noise problems. Buffering and other techniques will be used to ease noise problems, but track officials said "I'm not sure we'll ever reach complete agreement with [the residents] on [noise]."
The article reports that residents near Jupiter Farms, Florida are concerned that a proposed speedway in the community would create noise problems. Track officials say noise should be slight. Noise should be less because engine sizes will be limited, as opposed to a louder nearby racetrack where engine sizes are not limited.
The article notes that the facility "would include a 3/8-mile stock car track, go cart track, motocross off-road dirt track, mud bog track, rodeo arena and Jet Ski racing lake." The proposal was originally held up due to traffic concerns, but track officials have said that any traffic impacts will be to an under-capacity highway. Buffering and other techniques will be used to ease noise problems, but track officials said "I'm not sure we'll ever reach complete agreement with [the residents] on [noise]..., but the information I received is that the noise is not going to carry that much."
PUBLICATION: The Ledger
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Billy Townsend
DATELINE: Bartow, Florida
The Ledger reports that County Commissioners and the Sheriff's Office in Bartow, Florida disagree on whether to criminalize commercial noise violations. County commissioners want to criminalize commercial noise, while the sheriff's office believes it should remain a code-enforcement and nuisance law issue. The commissioners have postponed a vote to eliminate the current noise exemption for businesses to search for a compromise.
The article reports that County Commissioners and the Sheriff's Office in Bartow, Florida disagree on how to handle commercial noise violators. County commissioners want to criminalize commercial noise, while the sheriff's office believes it should remain a code-enforcement and nuisance law issue. The commissioners have postponed a vote to eliminate the current noise exemption for businesses to search for a compromise.
The article notes that the commissioners claimed that 98% of the time the criminal charges would never be applied, but instead the threat of criminal charges would be an incentive for businesses to take noise-reduction more seriously. The sheriff acknowledged this fact, but maintained that noise should be a code-enforcement issue and not a criminal one. He did admit, however, that the proposed stricter ordinance was designed partly to address deputies' frustrations with their inability to act effectively.
PUBLICATION: The Ledger
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Life; Pg. D1
BYLINE: Ted Hoffman
DATELINE: Lakeland, Florida
The Ledger prints a sarcastic column that says motorists with loud car stereos should not listen to blaring classical music -- as one local judge has designated -- but to tapes of crying babies.
The article prints a sarcastic column that challenges a local judge's punishment of choice for motorists with loud car stereos. The judge sentences violators to listen to blaring classical music, but the columnists says make them listening to tapes of crying babies. Not just any crying babies, but "babies with colic who are getting vaccinated and need to be changed. Babies who are just plain cranky and have all the self-control and courtesy of the boobs in the cars."
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 19; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Laura Chick, City Councilwoman
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that a Los Angeles city councilwoman is urging residents to support a council endorsement of state funding for noise walls that have been stalled for ten years. Some want to debate the list, asking for even more walls. The councilwoman believes that this type of action -- which would likely delay the endorsement -- would hinder the momentum needed for approval of the state funding.
The article reports that a Los Angeles city councilwoman is urging residents to support a council endorsement of state funding for noise walls that have been stalled for ten years. The 42 walls, which have not been constructed due to lack of funds, have received tentative funding through the state. A council endorsement would make approval more likely.
The article notes that some want to debate the list, asking for even more walls. The councilwoman believes that this type of action -- which would likely delay the endorsement -- would hinder the momentum needed for approval of the state funding. She notes that the state Transportation Commission would not be allowed to consider changes to the list anyway, according to procedural guidelines.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 26; Metro Desk
BYLINE: 7 Residents in the Los Angeles, California Area
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that seven residents wrote to the Los Angeles Times' editorial staff to oppose the proposed El Toro Airport. Among the issues mentioned, there are claims that more 'economic development' from the airport will be hollow, questions as to whether taxpayers should have to approve the airport with a 2/3 majority, and criticism of a dangerous ploy by city council to discourage the airport by approving noise-sensitive schools and residences near the site.
"Pro-airport consultant David Ellis' suggestion (Nov. 8) that school districts under the flight paths of proposed El Toro airport runways should simply build schools elsewhere is both shortsighted and disingenuous.
First, what message would that send to the parents of children in our district whose schools are already under or near the flight paths?
Second, how do we explain to the people of Aliso Viejo that we will not finish construction of a school in their neighborhood because the people of north Orange County want an airport flight path running right down the spine of that community?
Ellis would likely postulate that we should build Aliso Viejo's neighborhood school in San Clemente or San Juan Capistrano and bus Aliso Viejo children miles from their home during the day so that they only have to listen to the roar of jet engines in the afternoon and evening.
The superintendent and school board of Capistrano Unified will not abandon either the community of Aliso Viejo or the children who attend the seven schools that are under or near the flight paths of the proposed airport.
We prefer instead to be certain that as many Orange County residents as possible have access to the new scientific findings on the relationship between airport noise and children's ability to concentrate and learn, research that has emanated from Cornell University in the last three years."
JAMES A. FLEMING
Superintendent, Capistrano
Unified School District
"Changing existing zoning laws in order to allow homes and schools to be built close to the proposed new airport for the purpose of "throwing a monkey wrench into county plans for the commercial airport" is irresponsible.
As a resident of Irvine, I resent the fact that they are jeopardizing my tax money by exposing our city to countless lawsuits should the airport be built.
As a human being I resent using people for political purposes. Aren't we supposed to trust our elected officials to protect us instead of use us?"
ESTHER SMITH
Irvine
"South Orange County cities have, by the admission of one of their own, decided to use Saddam Hussein's hostage approach to discourage the conversion of the El Toro Marine Corps Air Station to a commercial airport. That's stooping mighty low.
These cities should be told unequivocally by the Board of Supervisors and pro-airport organizations that the presence of schools, residences and other noise-sensitive developments built near the proposed airport after the planning process has begun and before a final decision is made will have absolutely no impact on the final decision.
If, as many of us expect, the airport will eventually be built, these cities and developers should be held financially accountable by the occupants for any inconvenience caused by the airport."
J.W. KRAUS
Newport Beach
"It is difficult to believe that anyone could rationalize a decision to allow homes and schools to be built so close to a large airport.
I bet every lawyer in the county can't wait to represent those homeowners against Irvine when El Toro airport is built.
It's gross negligence for City Council members to allow families to move into an area in which their quality of life will most certainly be compromised."
A. GALLAGHER
Costa Mesa
"This county needs more economic development like it needs the plague.
Supervisors Charles V. Smith, Cynthia Coad and Jim Silva seem oblivious to the fact that our freeway system is already choked and the ecosystem is stretched to its limits with air pollution, beach pollution, noise pollution.
And in this environment, they ask us to embrace an El Toro international airport so we can have more people, more business, more factories, more freeways, more of everything.
And don't forget to include more air pollution, more water pollution, more noise pollution and, yes, more people pollution.
I have to believe these supervisors are intelligent people. Yet when they support economic development in Orange County with such vigor, I have to question motives and suspect the existence of some mysterious agenda other than benefit to the Orange County general community.
The El Toro airport is a blueprint for destruction of Orange County as a family-oriented community. If the El Toro airport comes to be, you will see development and growth that will in a short time duplicate the conditions that exist around Los Angeles International Airport.
I also view this compromise to build a smaller version of El Toro as the old "foot in the door" ploy--get an airport established and then it will be easy to expand it at a future time."
GIL NIXON
Huntington Beach
"It calls for a larger majority of citizens to believe it is absolutely necessary.
Given the severe negative impact any one of these things can have on the surrounding communities, it should require a two-thirds vote of the people.
This is not uncommon. If our schools need additional funds, they must obtain a two-thirds vote.
This initiative will give control of the county back to the people.
Our county government has already spent millions of the taxpayers' dollars promoting an airport that so far have produced nothing."
EILEEN MOSKOW
Laguna Niguel
"Disney has made clear its thoughts on El Toro airport; 192,000 signers of the Safe and Healthy Communities Initiative have asserted their thoughts on the issue; the Federal Aviation Administration has its doubts on the feasibility of the project; and Anaheim Hills is requesting from the county guarantees about El Toro air traffic and noise that the county can't give.
The Irvine Co. certainly owes the many residents who bought into the Irvine model a statement on its position on El Toro airport.
To sit quietly by, contending that more information is needed, as the company has stated in the past, borders on civil irresponsibility and corporate cowardice."
PAUL L. HUTCHINS
Laguna Woods
PUBLICATION: The New York Times
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Section 14; Page 6; Column 1; The City Weekly Desk
BYLINE: David Kirby
DATELINE: New York City
The New York Times reports that local officials and residents are complaining more and more often about noise from news helicopters. Officials have proposed solutions such as news programs sharing air coverage, or putting "restrictions on altitude and limits of when and for how long news helicopters can hover over residential areas," but New York officials have limited power, since news helicopters usually originate in New Jersey.
The article reports that local officials and residents are complaining more and more often about noise from news helicopters. Tourist helicopters have been regulated recently, and as those flights diminish, complaints are more often about news helicopters.
The article notes that officials have proposed solutions such as news programs sharing air coverage, but stations have opposed that idea because they want to send their own reporter up to cover the story. Another idea was to put "restrictions on altitude and limits of when and for how long news helicopters can hover over residential areas." New York officials also have limited power over regulation of the helicopters, since they usually originate in New Jersey.
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Northeast Ohio; Pg. 2B
BYLINE: James F. Sweeney
DATELINE: Cleveland, Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that a public hearing is scheduled in Cleveland over the FAA's draft Environmental Impact Statement (dEIS) for Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. Officials from several neighboring communities don't want the expansion to take place. Communities are also upset that the city has reduced the number of homes it will pay to soundproof because planes are quieter; they want a commitment to soundproof homes that experience 60 decibels of noise instead of the current 65.
The article reports that a public hearing is scheduled in Cleveland over the FAA's draft Environmental Impact Statement (dEIS) for Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. The airport wants to add a new 9,000 foot runway, and add over 2,000 feet to an existing runway to give it a length of 11,250 feet, to allow more frequent takeoffs and landings.
The article notes that officials from several neighboring communities don't want the expansion to take place. The International Exposition Center was bought from neighboring Brook Park by Cleveland in case it wants to tear it down for the expansion; the community is suing to get the property back by eminent domain. Communities are also upset that the city has reduced the number of homes it will pay to soundproof because planes are quieter; they want a commitment to soundproof homes that experience 60 decibels of noise instead of the current 65.
The article goes on to say that the final EIS will be at least another year in the works.
PUBLICATION: St. Petersburg Times
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Neighborhood TIMES; Letters; Pg. 2
BYLINE: Rickard Webster, Patrick Emory, Wayne Cantrell
DATELINE: St. Petersburg, Florida
The St. Petersburg Times prints two letters to the editor from St. Petersburg, Florida residents regarding noise. Two residents ask officials to abandon an effort to ban certain activities on environmentally-senstive Shell Key, and instead rely on existing noise laws to punish violators. Another residents says leaf blowers should be banned.
"Re: Shell Key faces tighter rules, Nov. 17.
I read with dismay the proposals to ban certain activities on Shell Key. These proposals included noise restrictions, bans on alcohol and on visiting certain portions of the environmentally sensitive key.
While I understand there are problems with some of the visitors to Shell Key, I don't see heavy-handed bans as a solution. As a contributor to the Sierra Club and other environmental advocacy groups, I feel very strongly about the preservation of nesting and roosting sites, but I also feel humans and wildlife can share this unique asset, as they have for decades.
I suggest education is the key to preservation. Erect eco-friendly signs educating Shell Key visitors about which areas of the key are most sensitive and why. Signs can instruct visitors about the need to keep noise in check, consume alcohol responsibly, properly dispose of trash and, above all, avoid wildlife areas. I believe that when visitors are properly educated, the vast majority will act responsibly and decades of freedom can be preserved."
Rickard Webster, St. Petersburg
"Let's keep park rules reasonable
As a taxpayer, voter and part-time resident (temporarily), I would suggest not getting too heavy-handed with Shell Key. In all the years I've been boating and frequenting Shell Key, I've yet to see the "obnoxious drunks" Jake Stowers, assistant county administrator, refers to.
Licensing vendors is probably a good idea, but any general park rules that are applied to Shell Key may invite more difficulties. Shell Key is not the usual park. It is a good place to have fun and relax. The boaters tend to keep the beach clean, picking up waste. In fact, I've observed it as being cleaner than most of the land-accessible beaches. I've never witnessed anyone disturbing the nesting birds or even venturing into where the nests are. Law enforcement has a congregated group of fun seekers. And, I've seen Customs, Coast Guard, Pinellas, St. Petersburg and even Tampa water patrols, not to mention state patrols. If there are "bad" things happening, one of those agencies should be able to control it.
My suspicion is that people who don't know or who have never been to Shell Key have decided all sorts of terrible things are going on: drunks throwing bird eggs at each other. That couldn't be further from the truth. Families go there. Dogs not on leashes stay close to their owners. Of course, there are exceptions. But there are certainly more drunks on the road than on Shell Key.
Sure, put up some kind of fencing and "keep out" signs on the delicate bird nesting areas. Have the cops arrest any real drunks. But please be reasonable. Don't ruin something that isn't bad.
As we all know from national politics, lawmakers love to pass laws, even though there are plenty on the books to cover any and all situations. Public drunkenness is already illegal. Littering is already illegal. Loud noise is already illegal. Let's be prudent, not antagonistic to the voters."
Patrick Emory, St. Louis, Mo.
"Leaf blowers create noise, air pollution
Having been concerned about the proliferation of leaf blowers, I was gratified to see a short TV news item recently concerning the possible banning of these machines in a suburban city because of their objectionable noise.
I would bet that most citizens have encountered situations in which leaf blowers were employed to blow dust or debris from another area into their own yard or into their eyes or lungs when walking outdoors or into the path of their cars when driving. There's a macho aspect of leaf blowers that seems to bring out the aggressiveness of their users.
My own concern is primarily aimed at the gross lack of consideration for others shown by the operators of these little nuisances. In addition to the noise and air pollution, the leaf blowers do nothing but relocate any movable debris, leaving the mess for someone else to pick up, clean up or blow away again later. What happened to people who clean up their trash rather than relocate it for someone else to worry about?
I'd like to see a local movement to hold down or eliminate the use of leaf blowers in any densely populated area - which means most of the places we live and work. I believe many of our citizens feel the same way."
Wayne Cantrell, St. Pete Beach
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: November 28, 1999
SECTION: Commentary, Pg. J4
BYLINE: Gordon L. Wall, Alan M. Keffer
DATELINE: Norfolk, Virginia
The Virginian-Pilot prints several letters to the editor, two of which are on the subject of aircraft noise. One writer says that while some fighter jets at Oceana Naval Base land and takeoff without too much noise, others seem to be purposely louder with high-performance takeoffs and low-altitude approaches. Another writer says those who complain about noise from military aircraft should move away if they don't like it.
"Jet noise levels aren't consistent
Just because the Navy landed some propeller planes at Oceana in 1945 does not give the Navy the right to expand the noise and crash zones any time it wants. If that statement is true, then the Army can fire cannons anywhere, anytime. The Army was firing cannons and rifles here in the late 1700s.
The Oceana noise level is not necessary. I have witnessed some fighter planes taking off with very little noise, but others in what appears to be an unnecessarily loud, high performance takeoff. I have seen some fighters land almost unheard and yet other fighters come in low and loud.
I guarded the perimeter of Chu Li airbase, and it was not as noisy as it is here. Of course at Chu Li, during the Vietnam War, jets that came in "low and loud" were used for target practice by snipers.
Before I bought my house, I spent time in the area to get an idea of the noise I would have to live with. At that time the occasional jet noise was tolerable. Now the noise is constant. If the Navy had been honest and said they were going to fly jets from 6:30 in the morning until after midnight, I would not have bought where I did."
"Jet noise no bother, but whiners are a pain
I've lived within a mile of the Fentress Naval Auxiliary Landing Field for 52 years. The airplanes were here before I was . . . certainly before all the whiners were here. I've had conversations interrupted, quiet moments disturbed and peaceful afternoons made noisy, and on every occasion I have been grateful for the umbrella these airplanes provide us and thankful for the sacrifices made by the men who fly them.
Dear whiners, please don't disturb the atmosphere with your selfish balderdash. Life here was better before you arrived and will improve upon your departure."
Previous week: November 21, 1999
Next week: December 5, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index