PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 4D
BYLINE: Paul Davis
DATELINE: Peace Dale, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that the town of Peace Dale, Rhode Island has approved money for the purchase of sound equipment after recent noise complaints against two local construction companies intensified. The company claims it has made "huge efforts" to lessen noise and dust, but reports of loud noise from 2 am to 6 am say otherwise.
The article reports that the town of Peace Dale, Rhode Island has approved $5,530 that will purchase two sound monitors, two sound calibrators, and expert training time for ten town employees. The impetus behind the purchase is an ongoing dust and noise problem at two local construction companies, coupled with the recent revision of the outdated noise ordinance.
The article notes that although neighbors have complained about excessive truck traffic, a study showed that only 2 percent of peak local traffic is from construction vehicles. One company -- Fiore Industries -- says that it already makes "huge efforts" to keep noise and dust down, including a water truck for the dust, and modification of delivery times.
The article goes on to say that Fiore has two zoning violations, due to the improper placement of pipe storage and the failure to create a buffer on one side of its property. Dust concerns, the town says, must be sent to the Department of Environmental Management for evaluation. Noise has been a resident complaint for years, but recently a louder noise -- that happens between 2 am and 6 am -- has officials eager to meet with the company to resolve long-standing complaints.
PUBLICATION: Waikato Times
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 3
DATELINE: Hamilton, New Zealand
The Waikato Times reports that a power plant located on a manufacturer's property in Hamilton, New Zealand is disturbing residents. The company has 6 weeks to lessen the noise to 42 decibels at the property line.
The article reports that a power plant located on a manufacturer's property in Hamilton, New Zealand is disturbing residents. The company has received an ultimatum from district officials that the plant must be quieted in 5-6 weeks.
The article notes that the plant was supposed to register only 42 decibels at the property line. Testing of the equipment has taken noise levels over that.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Trib West; Pg. 6; Zone: Dn
BYLINE: Hal Dardick.
DATELINE: Montgomery, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that a proposed noise ordinance in Montgomery, Illinois will have a three-week public comment period. Fines under the ordinance range from $50 to $500. The daytime permitted noise level is 60 decibels, and the nighttime level is 55 decibels. There are several exemptions.
The article reports that a proposed noise ordinance in Montgomery, Illinois will have a three-week public comment period. The ordinance would fine people from $50 to $500 for excessive noise.
The article notes that too much noise is defined as noise in excess of 60 decibels from 7 am to 10 pm, and noise in excess of 55 decibels at other times. Exemptions include lawn equipment, snow blowers, and construction "from 6 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Saturday and 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. Sunday." Community events and emergency equipment are always exempt.
PUBLICATION: Aberdeen Press and Journal
DATE: August 25, 1999
SECTION: Health: Hospitals, Pg.1
BYLINE: Mark Nicholls
DATELINE: Aberdeen, United Kingdom
The Aberdeen Press and Journal reports that construction at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary has been stopped until a way can be found that reduces the noise that cardiac patients and staff have to endure. The only option proposed is moving the cardiac patients away from the noise but they must somehow remain close to cardiac equipment that is difficult to move.
The article reports that construction at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary has been stopped until a way can be found that reduces the noise that cardiac patients and staff have to endure. Originally, construction workers issued industrial earplugs to patients. Grampian Local Health Council, a local watchdog group, visited the hospital and was assured that another solution would be found.
The article notes that the only option so far proposed is somehow moving the cardiac patients away from the noise. The problem is that they must remain close to cardiac equipment that is difficult to move. Patients' families were outraged at the pathetic protection that 'earplugs' provided. Staff was upset because they couldn't wear the earplugs since they needed sharp hearing to function.
The article goes on to say that the construction involved the demolishing of granite walls and the attachment of fire escapes.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: August 25, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Cicero, Illinois
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that the Chicago Motor Speedway's first race was twice as loud as normal traffic, and warranted a warning ticket from the County. Track officials don't believe they're violating any laws, but plan to meet with county representative next week.
The article reports that the Chicago Motor Speedway's first race was loud enough to warrant a warning ticket from the County Department of Environmental Control. County officials said that the noise from the cars and 70,000 fans was twice that of normal traffic. Although the ticket was a warning, real citations can be issued after each race and can be up to $1000.
The article notes that although the track is located next to a residential area, track officials believe they are not violating anything. They also said they had not yet received a citation of any kind. Officials from the county and from the track will meet next week to discuss the problem. One possible solution is the construction of sound walls.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: August 25, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Warwick, Rhode Island
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that residents of Warwick, Rhode Island want to leave behind the increasing noise from T.F. Green Airport. The opening of a new terminal in 1996 attracted larger, louder jets. One option, which in one recent case brought more than double the market value of houses to the sellers, is to have a realtor market an entire neighborhood for sale. Another is to hope that the airport gets a grant to buy individual houses. Those who have already soundproofed their houses with federal money may be lower priority for buyouts.
The article reports that residents of Warwick, Rhode Island are looking for ways to leave behind the increasing noise and pollution from T.F. Green Airport. The opening of a new terminal in 1996 transformed the airport from an airport with mainly small turbo-props to an airport with mainly jets from five new airlines. High-speed rail will be passed by the airport soon, because it is such a "success" story of growth.
The article interviews one particular resident who describes her situation in detail. Since the new terminal opened, "she awakens to her house rattling with every jet landing; her backyard pool is covered with an oil slick and black soot; and her children complain of headaches and earaches."
The article notes that homeowners are looking for ways to sell their houses, which are becoming increasing unlivable and less valuable. One option, which in one recent case brought more than double the market value of houses to the sellers, is to have a realtor market an entire neighborhood for sale. That way, developers that require continuous space will pay a premium for the unbroken tracts. It is not always possible to do this, however, because the land must also be in a prime location and all neighbors must agree unanimously.
The article notes that the airport is also applying for a noise-abatement grant that will allow the purchase of over two hundred homes. Some residents feel they were misled, since those who have recently taken grant money to soundproof their homes are automatically prioritized lower for home buyouts. One resident even circulated a petition to encourage her neighbors NOT to soundproof their homes, so the neighborhood would be more likely to be purchased as a group. Also, the new jets have shifted noise patterns, meaning that some homeowners who thought they could only hope for soundproofing (performed in lower noise areas) are now in higher-noise areas that are eligible for buyouts. Those that took the soundproofing, however, may be de-prioritized for buyouts.
PUBLICATION: The Bond Buyer
DATE: August 25, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 2
DATELINE: Richfield, Minnesota
The Bond Buyer reports on several issues related to bonds, including an issue with bonds sought by the Minnesota Metropolitan Airports Commission. They want to back bonds -- to be used for noise reduction efforts -- with airport revenue. The FAA said that they can't, since the efforts represent "projected impact" and not "actual costs."
The article reports on several issues related to bonds, including an issue with bonds sought by the Minnesota Metropolitan Airports Commission. They want to back $30-million in bonds -- to be used for noise reduction efforts -- with airport revenue. The FAA said that they can't do that, since the efforts represent "projected impact" and not "actual costs."
The article notes that the bonds would have been used to reduce noise at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The issue is particularly timely since residents or nearby Richfield are fighting the construction of a new runway, which is part of a larger $1-billion renovation.
PUBLICATION: Asheville Citizen-Times
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B2
BYLINE: Katy Hillenmeyer
DATELINE: Arden, North Carolina
The Asheville Citizen-Times reports that County Commissioners were asked by several residents in Arden, North Carolina to curb the noise made by an airboat operator on the French Broad River. After some responsibility-passing between the County Commissioners and the state Wildlife Commission, the County Commission has said it will hear public comments at its next area meeting, and will attempt to negotiate a compromise.
The article reports that County Commissioners were asked by several residents in Arden, North Carolina to curb the noise made by an airboat operator on the French Broad River. They say the noise prevents their peaceful enjoyment of the river.
The article notes that the residents first approached the state Wildlife Resources Commission, who referred them to the County Commission. County Commissioners then referred the problem to the state Wildlife Commission because the County noise ordinance exempts businesses. The Wildlife Commission then referred the problem back to the County, saying they would not further regulate boats on the river without the presence of an evident safety hazard.
The article goes on to say that the airboat operator -- who carries 100-250 people each weekend on his boat -- has promised to get a quieter propeller, and has limited his hours and days of operation. County Commissioners will hear public comments on the matter at their next meeting in the area, and hope that a compromise can be found.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Golden, Colorado
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that a four-day trial -- regarding the responsibility of Denver International Airport (DIA) to pay damages for exceeding its own noise standards in Adams County, Colorado -- is over. The lawsuit, brought by Adams County, is for $6.5-million and alleges that DIA broke its own noise standards 13 times. Denver says that "no one was harmed by the noise."
The article reports that a four-day trial -- regarding the responsibility of Denver International Airport (DIA) to pay damages for exceeding its own noise standards in Adams County, Colorado -- is over. The judge, who is from Jefferson County to ensure impartiality, will rule later: after at least a month.
The article notes that the lawsuit is for $6.5-million and alleges that DIA broke its own noise standards 13 times -- at $500,000 for each violation -- in its first year of operation. The standards and penalties were set in a 1988 agreement that Denver signed with Adams County that allowed the city to annex 43 acres for the airport. Denver says that "no one was harmed by the noise, and that the noise often cannot be heard above the racket of everyday living."
PUBLICATION: Bristol Evening Post
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg.15
BYLINE: Ian Onions
DATELINE: Bristol, United Kingdom
The Bristol Evening Post reports that a roofing company in south Bristol, United Kingdom has generated enough noise complaints that the local council has given them six months to leave their premises. Owners of the business deny that they are too loud, cite 10 years of harmony with neighbors before this, and say that their replacement could be even louder.
The article reports that a roofing company in south Bristol, United Kingdom has generated enough noise complaints that the local council has given them six months to leave their premises. Some council officers had said that allowing the business to stay -- under strict conditions limiting noise levels and working hours -- would have given the council more control over noise; now, as the business itself points out, any business who moves into the vacated premises could end up being louder.
The article notes that owners of the business deny that they are too loud, and cite 10 years of harmony with neighbors before this.
PUBLICATION: Business Journal-Jacksonville
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Vol 14; No 47; Pg 3
BYLINE: Lisa R Schoolcraft
DATELINE: Jacksonville; Florida
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Carol Schirado, member of the Craig Airport Citizens Advisory Committee
The Business Journal-Jacksonville reports that Craig Airport in Arlington, Florida is performing a $50,000, three-month noise abatement study, along with a cost/benefit analysis, to determine if a runway extension would be possible. Airport officials say they want to allow the airport to relieve nearby Jacksonville International Airport of more non-commercial air traffic. Residents fear that larger, commercial aircraft would use the airport, but airport officials say that they would seek an airport ban on commercial passenger aircraft at the airport.
The article reports that Craig Airport in Arlington, Florida is performing a $50,000, three-month noise abatement study, along with a cost/benefit analysis, to determine if a runway extension would be possible. They want to add 2,000 feet to one of two 4,000-foot runways at the airport at a cost of $6 million. Airport officials say they want to allow the airport -- which handles mainly individually-owned and business-owned aircraft -- to relieve nearby Jacksonville International Airport of more non-commercial air traffic. Currently Craig Airport handles 40% of regional business travel with 140,000 takeoffs and landings each year, but could handle 90% with the extension.
The article notes that residents are worried about increased noise that would come with an extension. Airport officials claim that noise and safety problems would actually decrease, since planes would take-off 2,000 feet further from property lines and since pilots would have more runway with which to work in the case of an emergency. Residents on the civic council maintain that the noise would simply impact a different neighborhood more strongly. The City Council has already said it is opposed to the extension.
The article goes on to say that residents fear that larger, commercial aircraft that require longer runways would use the airport if the extension was added. Although airport officials admit that the percentage of jets stationed at the airport (vs. turboprops) may rise from 2% to 5%, they say that they would seek an airport ban on commercial passenger aircraft at the airport.
The article mentions that other options include diverting more business traffic to Cecil Field, West of Jacksonville, or building a new airport near Southpoint. Officials at Jacksonville Port Authority say that the Cecil Field option would not be feasible unless the west side of town became a more vital business center. A new airport would simply cost too much money and would require thousands of acres that don't appear to be available. The runway extension would be paid for by federal, state, and Port Authority funding, together with fees charged to passengers.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Sun-Times
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Nws; Pg. 3
BYLINE: Tim Novak
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Sun-Times reports that a couple living in a high-rise condo in Chicago where units sell for $500,000 has sued their upstairs neighbor -- who is a judge -- for producing excessive noise. The building manager did a questionable "study" and determined that most noise comes through the walls, not the granite floor. The couple is demanding that the judge stop making certain noises, insulate his floor, and pay them $50,000 in damages and legal costs. The judge says he has had the floor for ten years without incident.
The article reports that a couple living in a high-rise condo in Chicago where units sell for $500,000 has sued their upstairs neighbor -- who is a judge -- for producing excessive noise. They maintain that after at least five complaints, his grandchildren, shoes, and a granite floor are still causing too much noise.
The article goes on to say that the building manager did a "study" to determine where the noise comes from, and determined that most noise comes through the walls, not the floor; the study was performed in one day and without being allowed into the couple's apartment. The judge maintains that he has had the granite floor for ten years without complaints, and doesn't plan to insulate it as his downstairs neighbors demand.
The article notes that the couple is demanding that the judge stop making certain noises, insulate his floor, and pay them $50,000 in damages and legal costs.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 4
BYLINE: Timothy S. Rooney
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that after repeated, similar complaints from residents the Schaumburg Regional Airport Advisory Commission has offered to invite an FAA official to a future meeting. One official said it would do no good, and that even the FAA would not change airport regulations. Residents, who maintain that the ten-year-old airport has gotten louder since 1995, were excited by the prospect
The article reports that after repeated, similar complaints from residents the Schaumburg Regional Airport Advisory Commission has offered to invite an FAA official to a future meeting. The Commission suggested this so the FAA can explain "in painfully clear terms so we don't have to keep going over the same issue time after time after time."
The article notes that at least one person on the commission disagreed, saying that even the FAA would not change airport regulations "just to satisfy the people who suffer the brunt of the noise." Some residents, however, were excited by the prospect.
The article goes on to say that although the airport continually reminds residents that it's been ten years and few complaints have been logged, residents maintain that noise levels increased when the village took over operation in 1995. 15 noise complaints were logged in one month from five households this summer.
PUBLICATION: The Columbus Dispatch
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: News , Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Doug Caruso
DATELINE: Columbus, Ohio
The Columbus Dispatch reports that Westerville, Ohio plans to enforce its soon-to-be-revised noise ordinance across community borders in an attempt to quiet a Columbus amphitheater. Columbus has agreed to allow Westerville to enforce its ordinance across community lines because it will be easier to prove a violation of Westerville's noise ordinance. The penalty of $5,000 per violation would probably not cause the amphitheater to alter its noise output, but repeated violations would allow a judge to shut the venue down.
The article reports that Westerville, Ohio plans to enforce its soon-to-be-revised noise ordinance across community borders. One immediate target will be a Columbus, Ohio amphitheater which regularly produces excessive noise in Columbus and Westerville. Columbus has agreed to allow Westerville to enforce its ordinance across community lines because it will be easier to prove a violation of Westerville's noise ordinance; Westerville's ordinance prohibits noise of over 100 decibels for 15 minutes, while Columbus' ordinance prohibits noise of over 100 decibels for one hour.
The article notes that the penalty of $5,000 per violation would probably not cause the amphitheater to alter its noise output. The amphitheater has ignored its 1997 promises to build a soundwall. However, repeated violations of Westerville's noise ordinance would allow a County judge to shut the venue down until efforts are made to quiet the noise. The noise would have to be recorded and documented.
PUBLICATION: Denver Rocky Mountain News
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Local; Ed. Final; Pg. 38A
BYLINE: Mike Patty
DATELINE: Denver, Colorado
The Denver Rocky Mountain News reports that testimony is over in a suit that claims Denver owes Adams County $6.5 million for 13 noise violations. A $500,000-per-violation penalty was set in an agreement between Denver and the County that allowed Denver to annex land for its airport. Denver claims no one was adversely affected, but the County says any violations were assumed to cause damages under the agreement even without proof of damages.
The article reports that testimony in a suit brought against Denver International Airport (DIA) by Adams County wrapped up after four days in court. The suit alleges that Denver owes Adams County $6.5 million for 13 noise violations in its first year of operation. A $500,000-per-violation penalty was set in a voluntary agreement between Denver and the County that allowed Denver to annex land from the County for DIA.
The article notes that Denver claims it should not have to pay since no one was adversely affected; they assert that much of the land where excessive noise was measured is agricultural land. The County points out that the agreement explicitly noted that damages -- such as reduced property values -- did not have to be proven; any violations were assumed to cause damage to the County.
The article noted that the judge will make her decision after about a month. She said "No matter what I decide, it is probably going to be appealed, [so] I would like to get it right the first time." The County wants Denver to reduce its operation by 10% increments until the noise is within standards. Airport officials said no legal mandates would help the Airport come into compliance.
PUBLICATION: The Deseret News
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B01
BYLINE: Donna M. Kempdeseret
DATELINE: Salt Lake City, Utah
The Deseret News reports that Utah's Transportation Commission is considering the removal of sound walls constructed along Interstate 215. 17 homeowners are already planning to sue for lost sunlight and views. A survey will be conducted of those who experience at least 65 decibels of highway noise in the Salt Lake City area to determine whether there is overwhelming support -- more than a majority -- for tearing down the walls
The article reports that Utah's Transportation Commission is considering the removal of sound walls constructed along Interstate 215. The walls were built in 1994 when most residents seemed to support the idea. At a recent meeting, 100 people were concerned that the walls should come down.
The article notes that 17 homeowners are already planning to sue for lost sunlight and views. A state official has said that lost views and sunlight do require compensation, but the Attorney General has yet to give an opinion. Either way, the commission says the money doesn't exist for tearing down sound walls, and it would likely drag out over several years.
The article notes that a survey will be conducted of those who experience at least 65 decibels of highway noise in the Salt Lake City area. Commissioners want overwhelming support -- more than a majority -- before they will consider tearing down the walls. They admit that their public process was "flawed" back in 1994, and will change the way it evaluates public approval.
The article concluded by noting several alternatives to tearing the walls down. One woman said she will fight to keep them. Another resident said walls on the west walls should be torn down but the east wall can remain.
PUBLICATION: The Gazette
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Editorial / Op-Ed; B2
BYLINE: Alastair Blackwood
DATELINE: Montreal, Canada
The Gazette prints a letter to the editor from a resident of Dorval, Canada near Montreal. The author says that he was stonewalled when he tried to obtain information on the number of operations at Dorval Airport. After failing to obtain official data, he made assumptions and calculated intolerable numbers of flights that pass over Dorval now that a key runway has been closed.
"On June 28, I wrote to Norman Boivin, general manager of Dorval airport, and to Dorval Mayor Peter Yeomans regarding the greatly increasing noise level over southwestern Dorval resulting from the closing of Runway 24- right.
I offered a possible solution to ease the burden on the residents under the flight path by spreading the noise print more equitably.
Attempting to determine the actual number of aircraft taking off Runway 24- left on July 8, I phoned the control tower but was refused the information and referred to the airport manager's office. This office passed me on to the noise -management group. Contacting it had a negative result and it was suggested that I make a written request. This was done, but to date no reply has been received.
Not one of these offices made any effort to obtain the data for me, which I am sure could have been obtained by a phone call to the tower. I can only assume the tower has been advised not to reveal this information and any requests are just stonewalled.
Not being given the requested information, I made the following assumption. On July 8, there were 262 scheduled departures from Dorval listed on its Web page. With two runways partially closed for maintenance, if 75 per cent of the flights used Runway 24-left, there were 196 flights over the residents of southwestern Dorval. This is intolerable.
The transfer of flights from Mirabel was imposed on Dorval residents without consultation. It might be a commercial success, but this has been at the expense of western Dorval residents. We now also have the dubious honour of being more polluted than central Montreal because of jet-fuel residue.
Aeroports de Montreal cannot continue to ignore the noise complaints of residents. Some method must be found for citizens to have input to the ADM with reference to noise pollution. I am certain there are many suggestions for fine-tuning the system to make life more tolerable for Dorval."
PUBLICATION: The Jerusalem Post
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 2
BYLINE: Rosalyn Harari
DATELINE: Ra'anana, Israel
The Jerusalem Post prints several news items centering on the Jerusalem region, including one one noise. This summer there was a 100% increase in complaints over loud air conditioners in Ra'anana, Israel. Offenders can be charged NIS 100 for officials that measure the noise. They are usually cooperative in relocating or quieting their air-conditioners.
The article reports that this summer there was a 100% increase in complaints over loud air conditioners in Ra'anana, Israel. Most residents are cooperative once approached, but some must be threatened with a fine. Even before the fine, residents are charged NIS 100 for measuring the noise.
The article notes that "usually the noise is caused because the air-conditioning unit is too near to neighbors' balconies or that the motor is too noisy." Residents are usually asked to relocate their air-conditioners or somehow reduce the noise.
PUBLICATION: The Ottawa Citizen
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Business; D11
BYLINE: Cheryl Clock
DATELINE: St. Catharines, Ontario
The Ottawa Citizen reports that grape farmers in Ontario use many noise-based technologies to scare birds away from their grapes. Gas-powered cannons called 'bird bangers' are the loudest, and many complaints about them come from nearby residents. If the cannons go off too often or are too close to neighbors, officials may suggest changes, but "farmers are allowed to use all methods 'within reason' to protect their crop."
The article reports that grape farmers in Ontario use many noise-based technologies to scare birds away from their grapes. They can lose 1 ton -- $750 -- in one day from a larger group of gorging birds. They use speakers to broadcast bird distress calls and other noises, but gas-powered cannons called 'bird bangers' are the loudest.
The article notes that those cannons cause many complaints from nearby residents. The agricultural engineer at the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs responds to the complaints, but "preaches tolerance." He says that "most grape growers are responsible farmers who do only what's absolutely necessary to protect their crop." If the cannons go off too often or are too close to neighbors, he may suggest changes, but "under Bill 146, farmers are allowed to use all methods 'within reason' to protect their crop."
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: August 27, 1999
SECTION: Front, Pg. A1
BYLINE: Jack Dorsey
DATELINE: Virginia Beach
The Virginian-Pilot reports that flights at Oceana Air Base in Virginia Beach will be increasing from 40 operations per day to 60 during the first 2.5 weeks in September because seven squadrons of pilots need to become certified before being sent overseas. The new base commander seems attentive to noise concerns, and hopes to make use of steeper descents, different runway usage, and different turning patterns on takeoff to ensure that aircraft are as high as possible when they pass over residential communities.
The article reports that flights at Oceana Air Base in Virginia Beach will be increasing from 40 operations per day to 60 during the first 2.5 weeks in September. Activity is increasing because seven squadrons of pilots need to become certified before being sent overseas. The increased noise -- which will be due in large part to simulated carrier deck landings -- may begin as early as 6 a.m. and end as late as 4:30 a.m.
The article notes that the new base commander seems attentive to noise concerns, and his first step was getting the warnings about increased noise out early. He also hopes to make use of steeper descents, different runway usage, and different turning patterns on takeoff to ensure that aircraft are as high as possible when they pass over residential communities. Those
The article goes on to say that Oceana has received eight new F-18 squadrons this year from Cecil Field in Florida. Its activity has more than doubled over last year's 190,000 operations. Fentress Field in Chesapeake will also experience noise, since it is the primary place where aircraft do simulated aircraft carrier landing, even though they take off from Oceana. Fentress and Oceana recently completed an Environmental Impact Statement, and so is being careful that noise zones established under the statement are not altered.
The article notes that the city council has decided to work with the base in determining ways to warn the public earlier about changes in noise patterns that may disrupt them. Oceana already publishes flight information on their website, but they also want to establish a hotline that has the most recent changes to flight information as necessitated by weather.
The article concludes, noting that the base commander "has reminded all of the 21 squadrons of F/A-18s and F-14s at Oceana - about 330 aircraft - that they will follow course rules and adhere to altitudes and air speeds that have been established, or face his anger." "We are not calloused to the impact of noise, " he said. "We know what it does. We are doing all that we can to help."
PUBLICATION: Aberdeen Press and Journal
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Business: Companies, Pg.3
BYLINE: Leanne Carter
DATELINE: Keith, United Kingdom
The Aberdeen Press and Journal reports that a dairy in Keith, United Kingdom has been granted only temporary consent to continue its operation on grounds of noise pollution, although no official complaints have been filed. Disruptions to residents have included the unloading of big trucks as late as 2:30 a.m. and fowl language.
The article reports that a dairy in Keith, United Kingdom has been granted temporary consent to continue its operation for the next twelve months while local officials continue to monitor noise at the site. No official noise complaints have been filed this year, but counselors said residents have indeed complained. Because of that, the counselors went against planning department officials who recommended permanent consent to operate.
The article notes that councillors want to continue monitoring the noise from the site over the next year. Disruptions to residents have included the unloading of big trucks as late as 2:30 a.m. (only doorstep vans are supposed to unload that late) and fowl language.
PUBLICATION: Asheville Citizen-Times
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Julie Ball
DATELINE: Hendersonville, North Carolina
The Asheville Citizen-Times reports that a realtor in Hendersonville, North Carolina will lose her license for sixty days for failing to inform a couple that they were going to be living in the approach path of Asheville Regional Airport (ARA). The realtor claims she didn't know about "any significant air traffic over the Heatherwood subdivision." The state Real Estate commission judged that air traffic from ARA since it is "sufficiently important that an ordinary person would want to know" about it.
The article reports that a realtor in Hendersonville, North Carolina will lose her license for sixty days for failing to inform a couple that they were going to be living in the approach path of Asheville Regional Airport (ARA). The realtor was advised to settle with the couple by the state Real Estate Commission, but the couple have not said whether they will accept. The license suspension can be stayed if the realtor takes "additional course work."
The article notes that the realtor claims she didn't know about "any significant air traffic over the Heatherwood subdivision." The local Board of Realtors has since been notified explicitly that homebuyers in the area must be notified of potential noise from ARA.
The state Real Estate Commission receives about 1,000 complaints each year, and then decides whether to take action against the realtor in question. The commission judged that realtors should be required to notify homebuyers of air traffic from ARA since it is "sufficiently important that an ordinary person would want to know" about it.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Put-In-Bay, Ohio
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that Put-In-Bay, Ohio has created a noise ordinance to crack down on bars which compete with each other by turning up their music. Police will now fine those who exceed 95 decibels on weekends and holidays $100.
The article reports that Put-In-Bay, Ohio has created a noise ordinance to crack down on bars which compete with each other by turning up their music. The town is known as a party spot, and around 10,000 people come to the island on summer weekends. Bars think that louder stereos draw customers.
The article notes that police will now fine those who exceed 95 decibels on weekends and holidays $100. Although music from bars is the main problem, noisy boat engines is also one target of the ordinance. The violation is considered a minor misdemeanor.
PUBLICATION: Chapel Hill Herald
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Editorial; Pg. 4;
DATELINE: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The Chapel Hill Herald prints an editorial that comes out strongly in favor of a new noise ordinance that removes exemptions for agricultural equipment. The revisions were made to force the Chapel Hill Country Club to quiet its green-aerating fans that cause 70 decibels of noise at neighbors property lines. Now that the fans will no longer be exempt, they must remain quieter than 60 decibels during the day and 50 decibels at night.
The article prints an editorial that comes out strongly in favor of a new noise ordinance that removes exemptions for agricultural equipment. The revisions were made because the Chapel Hill Country Club has been using fans "15 hours a day, eight to 12 months a year" to aerate its greens.
The article notes that neighbors of the golf course endure 70 decibels at their property line. Now that the fans will no longer be exempt, they must remain quieter than 60 decibels during the day and 50 decibels at night. The editorial notes that businesses should operate with minimal interference, but emphasized the golf course's responsibility to the community.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Sun-Times
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Edt; Letters; Pg. 38
BYLINE: Oreste J. Florence, Ginny Kroening
DATELINE: Cicero, Illinois
The Chicago Sun-Times prints several letters to the editor including two that criticize the new Chicago Motor Speedway for exceeding noise standards. The first letter is bitingly concise. The second -- from an attendee of the first race -- says the track should have done more research to prevent the problem in the first place.
"Tracking complaints
It's one thing when a person moves next to an airport or a motor racetrack that has been there for years, then proceeds to make baseless complaints about the deafening noise.
It's another thing when an airport or motor racetrack opens in a residential area, then becomes deaf to the residents' complaints."
"Track plan needed
I commend the Sun-Times for its level-headed editorial (Aug. 24) regarding the noise emanating from the Chicago Motor Speedway during the first-ever race held there.
My husband and I attended the race and had a fine time. I find it hard to believe that the issue of noise was never raised prior to the race. Didn't Cicero officials attend races at any other tracks or at least ask questions of other communities that host races to find out anything about noise, crowd and traffic control or any of these other issues that can be a factor when a race is held?
Track officials certainly should have known that noise could be a problem.
The other issue that needs to be addressed is parking and traffic. The shuttle buses from the remote lots worked fine going into the track, but after the race, we were all leaving at the same time and it was a big mess. There needed to be many more police, and a more efficient way to direct traffic.
I hope that common sense will prevail on both sides of the issue and that this racetrack will flourish for many years to come."
PUBLICATION: The Gazette
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: News; A6
BYLINE: Darren Becker
DATELINE: Montreal, Canada
The Gazette reports that a Blainville, Canada resident will attempt to file a class-action suit for $30,000 against the Metropolitan Transport Agency (MTA), as officials of nearby of nearby communities follow the case in hopes of learning what they can do if similar noise problems develop for their new rail lines. The communities are planning a public meeting that will inform residents of available recourse before the train lines are even installed.
The article reports that a Blainville, Canada resident will petition Quebec Superior Court for permission to file a class-action suit for $30,000 against the Metropolitan Transport Agency (MTA). The resident says that MTA's high-speed train disrupts his life with noise and pollution. Officials of nearby Cote St. Luc and Hampstead are following the case in hopes of learning what they can do if similar problems develop from the rail lines destined for their communities.
The article notes that in addition to money, the suit demands repairs to quiet trains and reduce pollution. Cote St. Luc and Hampstead are planning a public meeting that will inform residents of available recourse before the train lines are even installed, including the possibility of filing their own class-action suit. The meeting will include lawyers who are representing the Blainville resident.
The article goes on to say that a recent ruling by the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) forced a rail company to quiet their noise, though it stopped short of awarding monetary damages. This case lends support to the responsibility of companies to consult residents before installing a rail line. To date, Cote St. Luc and Hampstead residents have complained about railways coming through their communities, but municipalities have had limited ability to force federal railways to change.
PUBLICATION: The Irish Times
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Front Page; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Miriam Donohoe
DATELINE: Ireland
The Irish Times reports that Ireland's Minister of Enterprise told legislators that she hoped for " an alteration to the European Union (EU) aircraft noise directive." Her official position says Ireland neither "champions nor opposes" the rule. According to statements after the fact, she meant to say that she hoped talks between the U.S. and the E.U. are progressing well. She has met with other EU officials to emphasize the plight of Irish businessmen who may lose money under the rule which bans the use of hush-kits on louder airplanes.
The article reports that Ireland's Minister of Enterprise told legislators that she hoped for " an alteration to the European Union (EU) aircraft noise directive." The directive aims to limit noise from aircraft by requiring newer, quieter airplanes to replace older hush-kitted airplanes that are much louder. The U.S. has been opposed to the rule because it would restrict their 'hush-kitted' airplanes in the E.U., and a prominent Irish businessman has come out against the rule saying it would cost one of his companies 26.8 million pounds.
The article notes that the Minister of Enterprise's official position -- as presented by her spokesperson -- differs from the opinion she presented to legislators. Her official position says Ireland neither "champions nor opposes" the rule. According to statements after the fact, she meant to say that she hoped talks between the U.S. and the E.U. are progressing well.
The article goes on to say that the Minister of Enterprise attended a recent informal meeting of EU Transport Ministers to encourage consideration for Irish businessmen -- such as the one mentioned above -- who would lose money under the new directive.
The article notes that the directive will come into effect next April, one year from its approval date.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Highway 1; Part W; Page 1; Financial Desk
BYLINE: David Colker
DATELINE: United States
The Los Angeles Times reports that motorcyclists can damage their hearing, if they ride over 50 MPH on a regular basis, simply from wind noise. At 65 MPH, two hours of riding can cause permanent damage; at 80 MPH, one hour can cause damage. A study conducted in the early 1990s in Britain showed hearing loss in 250 motorcyclists who rode regularly for at least five years with helmets but without earplugs.
The article reports that motorcyclists can damage their hearing, if they ride over 50 MPH on a regular basis, simply from wind noise. At 65 MPH, two hours of riding can cause permanent damage; at 80 MPH, one hour can cause damage. Although foam earplugs are illegal for motorcyclists in California, $35 fitted earplugs are legal there and can cut wind noise while allowing important highway sounds -- such as that from other cars -- to remain audible.
The article notes that wind noise overwhelms the comparatively quiet noise from the engine at 40 MPH. A study conducted in the early 1990s in Britain showed hearing loss in 250 motorcyclists who rode regularly for at least five years with helmets but without earplugs.
PUBLICATION: The Northern Echo
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 8
BYLINE: Karen Smith
DATELINE: Darlington, United Kingdom
The Northern Echo reports that Darlington, U.K. residents turned out at a public meeting in force to protest a proposed 25,000-seat football stadium. Residents presented a 2,000 name petition against the stadium, and challenged developers to explain how they would avoid potential noise, traffic, and violence problems "from rival fans."
The article notes that most residents left the meeting feeling it was a waste of time, since developers "did not have answers or understand about the pedestrian access being proposed. We, the protesters, are more informed than they are."
The article concludes noting that developers realized that protesters were unhappy, but said that they "will always be against it no matter how many meetings we have." The developers pledged to build the stadium: whether it be there or elsewhere.
PUBLICATION: Orange County Register
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Community; Pg. 01
BYLINE: Deepa Bharath
DATELINE: Anaheim Hills, California
The Orange County Register reports that at a recent debate over a proposed new airport at the former El Toro Military Base, many Anaheim Hills, California residents shared fears of "increased pollution, proliferation of 'slum' neighborhoods that commonly surround airports, and a more "transportation-business-oriented community." They didn't worry much about noise problems, which airport proponents say wouldn't effect the community in the first place.
The article reports that many Anaheim Hills, California residents attended a recent debate over a proposed new airport at the former El Toro Military Base. The district supervisor argued that noise in the community comes from nearby John Wayne Airport, and would not be increased by an airport at El Toro. A local councilman argued that although this may be true, the airport "would attract low-paying jobs" and cause a housing shortage.
The article notes that other residents also fear increased pollution, proliferation of 'slum' neighborhoods that commonly surround airports, and a more "transportation-business-oriented community."
PUBLICATION: The Post and Courier
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: Ber, Pg. 01
BYLINE: Tyees Douglas
DATELINE: St. Stephen, South Carolina
The Post and Courier reports that St. Stephen, South Carolina officials have begun more aggressive enforcement of several local laws. Now, you can be fined $348 for noise that can be heard over 50 feet away, or $360 for darkly-tinted rear windows on your car that could obstruct the view of police.
The article reports that St. Stephen, South Carolina officials have begun more aggressive enforcement of their noise ordinance which prohibits noise -- especially from cars -- from being so loud that it can be heard from 50 feet away. The fine is $348.
The article also notes that a measure prohibiting darkly-tinted windows will be enforced more often. If rear windows permit less than 24% of light to pass through, it is considered a threat to the safety of police officers if they need to make a routine traffic stop and see into the car. The fine for dark windows is $360. Epperson said.
PUBLICATION: Press Journal
DATE: August 26, 1999
SECTION: A Section; Pg. A10
BYLINE: Christina Mitchell
DATELINE: Stuart, Florida
The Press Journal reports that Panther Woods, Florida residents are split over whether to support a new $24-million link to the Interstate and the Florida Turnpike. Many residents say the link will be more convenient and will help development. Others say that noise will increase substantially.
The article reports that Panther Woods, Florida residents are split over whether to support a new $24-million link to the Interstate and the Florida Turnpike. Many residents -- especially those associated with the local country club -- say that the link will be more convenient than the current roundabout route that requires 3.5 miles of driving to get to the Interstate and 6 miles to get to the Turnpike. They say it will help development as well.
The article notes that some residents worry about increased noise, which they say is already bad because of the Interstate. Proponents of the link say that the orange groves and the golf course buffer the community and will continue to.
The article concludes by noting that the road was originally proposed to ease traffic at the current Interstate linkage, which sees 25,000 vehicles each day and could see double that number in twenty years. A community forum will be organized soon to address residents' concerns.
PUBLICATION: Chapel Hill Herald
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Front; Pg. 1;
BYLINE: Beth Velliquette
DATELINE: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The Chapel Hill Herald reports that the Chapel Hill, North Carolina Town Council has given preliminary approval to a noise ordinance amendment that will prohibit the constantly-running fans at the local country club. The fans are needed to keep cool air moving around greens so the grass won't die, but a resident living nearby said the noise is invasive no matter what the level.
The article reports that the Chapel Hill, North Carolina Town Council has given preliminary approval to a noise ordinance amendment that will prohibit the constantly-running fans at the local country club. The fans were exempted under the original ordinance. Course officials were not at the public meeting because the letter informing them about it wasn't received until after the meeting.
The article notes that the fans are needed to keep cool air moving around greens so the grass won't die. The club replaced a fan mounted high on a pole with a quieter model that sits closer to the ground, but a resident living nearby still complained. The fans -- both old and new -- were within local noise limits according to course officials; the resident claimed that noise limits were violated at night, and that the noise was invasive no matter what the level.
The article notes that while the resident claimed that the fans run 8-12 months a year, course officials said "We don't start using it until mid-summer and stop in mid-September."
PUBLICATION: The Independent
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Features; Pg. 7
BYLINE: Ginetta Vedrickas
DATELINE: United Kingdom
The Independent reports an article that discusses disputes between neighbours in the United Kingdom. In the U.K., approximately 90 percent of neighbor conflicts result form personality differences; one owner's enemy could be the next owner's friend.
The article notes an example of a mentally ill man who screamed and sang at all hours, and caused his neighbours to eventually sell their house. Social services was called in, but they could do nothing since the man refused help.
The article notes that in the U.K., home sellers are now required to notify potential buyers of disputes with their neighbours on special real estate disclosure forms. Some sellers use vague language, so buyers should ask questions, visit the property at different times of day, and generally stay aware of any potential problems.
The article notes that mediation is an increasingly popular answer. With over 150 mediation groups in England, interest is growing.
PUBLICATION: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Editorial, Pg. A-10, Letter To The Editor
BYLINE: Michael Mccann
DATELINE: Pitcairn, Pennsylvania
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette prints a letter to the editor that criticizes those who accept city noise and fireworks while complaining about medical helicopters.
"I have worked on the North Side for the past 11 years and am still amazed at some people's priorities in this city. All day long you can hear trucks, cars and buses - but that is just the noise of the city.
At a recent baseball game, there were fireworks. Every so often during the evening a large boom would rattle the windows, and at the end of the game it sounded like a war zone for about 15 minutes. Again, no problem, this is for entertainment so no one seems to mind.
On the other hand, every time a helicopter lands or takes off from Allegheny General Hospital, the telephone rings with noise complaints. Maybe if it were a sightseeing operation instead of a lifesaving operation, the neighbors would not mind so much.
I find it hard to believe that anyone can complain about 15 seconds of noise that saved another life.
Editor's note: The writer is a pilot who flies the Life Flight helicopter."
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Opinion Pg. B-15:2,7; B-11:1
BYLINE: Charles Zangas, Dennis M. Clausen, Larry Laumann, Peter E. Bureau, Michael Doyle, Susan Lenzkes
DATELINE: San Diego, California
The San Diego Union-Tribune prints several letters to the editor regarding a recent Escondido, California meeting about helicopter noise from Miramar Marines Base. Some criticized complainers and said the military is necessary and quiet enough. Others criticized meeting-goers who booed military officials. Others criticized military officials for 'burning time' allotted for public questions and for 'smugly' sitting together while many elderly people stood throughout the meeting.
"Emotions fly high at a North County meeting on helicopter noise
Re: "Meeting on Corps choppers overflows" (B-1, Aug. 26):
I was disappointed and saddened, but not surprised, at the performance of my fellow North County residents at Wednesday night's Escondido town hall meeting on helicopter noise.
I would have expected much more from people, most of them from my generation, who have known war, hardship and sacrifice. What really upset me was the discourteous, ignorant and ungrateful booing and hissing when Col. Lou Rehberger attempted to describe the Marine Corps' position and intentions. The colonel, a patriot who for 30 years has sacrificed for his country, has fought to give us the right to disagree, but not, I think, to ridicule and jeer him when he was simply doing his job. I guess I should have expected as much from a group softened by the good life and imbedded as it is in this "I- me-my" generation we live in.
I was also amazed at the "we-were-here-first" comments, another version of the NIMBY attitude. I submit that our "back yard" has been war-free for more than 100 years because the Marine Corps has been doing its job.
If the issue of helicopter noise has become our No. 1 priority, to the point where we spend our days charting the number of fly-overs and altitudes, or calling the commanding officer of Miramar every time a helo comes over or near our homes, it's time to reassess our priorities and what it is we do with our leisure time."
"The agenda for the meeting regarding Marine helicopters called for a "brief presentation by panelists (5-10 minutes each)." This was to be followed by " questions from the public" for 75 minutes.
All panelists were "brief" except for Rehberger, who not only used up his allotted time, but almost half the time reserved for questions. He said he needed this much time to explain all of the safety and other concerns for helicopters flying to and from Miramar in some of the most densely traveled air space in America.
Many in the audience were frustrated by what they perceived to be a classic attempt to "burn time" to limit public input. To others, the fact that he needed that much time to explain the dangers of flying in San Diego County's crowded air space was more proof that the helicopters belong elsewhere."
"Rehberger monopolized the limited time available with an irrelevant and self-serving monologue. His disdain for the overwhelming majority in the audience who support adoption of the less intrusive eastern route was clear and disturbing.
Rehberger's arrogance was nearly matched by his ill-mannered, uniformed entourage who smugly sat together near the front while hundreds of seniors stood throughout the two-hour meeting.
The few and the proud showed their true colors Wednesday night and it wasn't pretty."
"What a spectacle! The people who keep returning super-patriot, aging jet- jockey Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Escondido, to Congress booing a Marine Corps colonel, shouting and pounding on doors. Nothing like a threat to property values to make Republicans act like Abbie Hoffman, circa 1968."
"Re: "Hunter and 'Duke' at odds over copter flight patterns" (B-section, Aug. 26):
Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-El Cajon, is to be congratulated for finally coming forward to speak his piece on the helicopters. When is everyone going to learn that you do not tell Uncle Sam what to do? The federal government tells us what to do, not the other way around.
We live one airline mile from the runway at Miramar and, after 24 years of listening to jets, it has been so quiet since the Marines landed that we enjoy being outside, talking on the phone and not having to scream to be heard."
"In response to suggestions that flight patterns be altered in our highly populated areas, Hunter stated that "it's not the mission of the Marine Corps to be loved."
True. However, it is the job of our military, in war or in peace, to accomplish its mission with the least number of civilian casualties. And the Marines are killing the peace and sanity of thousands with their noise. It's a slow, tortured death."
PUBLICATION: The Tampa Tribune
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Pinellas, Pg. 5
BYLINE: Stephen Thompson
DATELINE: St. Petersburg, Florida
The Tampa Tribune reports that St. Petersburg, Florida police have stepped up enforcement of their noise ordinance. $43 tickets are issued after the first warning for noise that is plainly audible at 100 feet away.
The article reports that St. Petersburg, Florida police have stepped up enforcement of their noise ordinance under "Operation Tone Down." A recent demonstration next to an airport showed that loud car stereos can be as loud as small aircraft nearby.
The article notes that warnings are issued to motorists the first time. For subsequent infractions, a $43 ticket is issued. Noise that is "plainly audible" 100 feet away is considered an offense, and the offender's car must be in sight. Noise meters purchased by the police were deemed impractical because the source must be monitored for 8 minutes to be accurate.
PUBLICATION: The Union Leader
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Section A Pg. 5
BYLINE: Paul Montgomery
DATELINE: Jaffrey, New Hampshire
The Union Leader reports that after loud car stereos caused noise problems outside quiet memorial day services this year, police in Jaffrey, New Hampshire decided to begin enforcing their noise ordinance. The ordinance also covers barking dogs, and loud motorcycles. Fines are $100.
The article reports that after loud car stereos caused noise problems outside quiet memorial day services this year, police in Jaffrey, New Hampshire decided to begin enforcing their noise ordinance.
The article notes that fines can reach $100 for infractions. Officers site disturbance to residents as well as driving safety issues as reasons for the ordinance.
The article goes on to say that another common noise problem in Jaffrey is barking dogs. The department loans out a special collar that sprays citronella when a dog barks. This way a dog -- which doesn't like citronella anymore than mosquitoes do -- learns not to bark as often.
The article also notes that warnings have been issued to motorcyclists who alter their mufflers to be louder. Officers say warnings seem to be sufficient.
The article notes that Swanzey -- a nearby community -- has no noise ordinance, and is hesitant to commit to a definition of "noise" or "excessive noise" since that definition can differ from person to person.
PUBLICATION: The Virginian-Pilot
DATE: August 28, 1999
SECTION: Front, Pg. A1
BYLINE: Vandana Sinha
DATELINE: Virginia Beach
The Virginian-Pilot reports that Virginia Beach is trying to alter its image by reducing nuisance behaviors that intimidate families. Although noise violations are down 14% from last year, nuisance behavior still dominates violations in the area. Kids and adults are quoted as saying that truly offensive nuisances -- those that aren't just caused by people's stereotypes based on race or clothing -- do not follow lines of race, age, or fashion. Police have taken new measures to reduce nuisance behavior.
The article reports that Virginia Beach is trying to alter its image by reducing nuisance behaviors that intimidate families. This year there were 18% fewer behavior violations -- including noise, public drunkenness and disorderly conduct -- at the Oceanfront this year. Nuisance behavior still dominates violations in the area, accounting for over one-third of the 5,700 total violations during 3.5 months of early summer. However, unnecessary noise is down 14 %.
The article is extensive, and discusses issues that intimidate families such as noise, disorderly conduct, short skirts and baggy pants. Kids and adults are quoted as saying that truly offensive nuisances -- those that aren't just caused by people's stereotypes based on race or clothing -- do not follow lines of race, age, or fashion.
The article notes that police often move violators before arresting them to avoid potential mob scenes. They have also taken measures such as closing parking lots at 2:30 a.m. to prevent all-night parties.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Daily Herald
DATE: August 25, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 8
BYLINE: Chris Fusco
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Daily Herald reports that a 98% increase in flight delays at Chicago's O'Hare Airport in recent months has pushed 22 more flights after 10 PM each night. The 98% increase in delays comes after less than 1% growth in air traffic, suggesting that the problems are not with strained capacity. Noise complaints are down, and noise monitors are reading lower, but activists still say that planes aren't using designated quieter nighttime runways enough.
The article reports that a 98% increase in flight delays at Chicago's O'Hare Airport in recent months has pushed 22 more flights after 10 PM each night, a time when many residents are going to sleep.
The article notes that the 98% increase in delays comes after less than 1% growth in air traffic, suggesting that the problems are not with strained capacity but are "with the nation's newly upgraded air traffic control system and to bad weather."
The article goes on to say that noise complaints for the second quarter are down 345 from last year to 2,255. Of the 37 noise monitors around the airport, 5 registered higher and 9 registered lower than last year. Airport officials attribute the improvements to quieter engines -- due in part to federal regulations -- and better compliance with "fly quiet" routes. Officials said that 70% of those using the most preferable "quiet nighttime runway" are staying close to the designated quiet flight path.
The article then notes that only 18% of flights are using the quiet runway to begin with. Airport officials say this is partly because of rushes to get planes off the ground by 10 PM, but Arlington Heights Village President Arlene Mulder says "You can't just keep doing it and telling us why it happened."/P>
PUBLICATION: Aberdeen Press and Journal
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: Business: Companies, Pg.3
BYLINE: Leanne Carter
DATELINE: Keith, United Kingdom
The Aberdeen Press and Journal reports that a milk depot in Keith, United Kingdom will be issued permanent consent for their development after two years of conflicts with the city council about noise levels. The depot has impressed council members with their noise mitigation efforts, and no further noise complaints have been issued.
The article reports that a milk depot in Keith, United Kingdom will be issued permanent consent for their development after two years of conflicts with the city council about noise levels. In 1997, the council granted temporary consent, saying that noise levels must be reduced in one year. In 1998, they again granted temporary consent, preferring to hold off on permanent consent while council members verified noise levels for another year.
The article notes that permanent consent will now be granted, as the depot has impressed council members with their noise mitigation efforts. Neighbors originally complained about noise from the depot waking them up at night, but no further complaints have been issued.
PUBLICATION: The Baltimore Sun Company
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: Local ,1B
BYLINE: Edward Lee
DATELINE: North Laurel, Maryland
The Baltimore Sun Company reports that a gas station operator in North Laurel, Maryland wants to keep his business open 24 hours each day. A petition showed local support, but the local civic association claims that residents would be adversely affected by the new hours. The business owner says "None of the four people who testified [against the new hours] can say they have the official capacity to represent the people who live next to the gas station," who have complained less since the owner planted fifteen-foot trees to block light and noise.
The article reports that a gas station operator in North Laurel, Maryland wants to keep his business open 24 hours each day. The station currently closes from midnight to 6 a.m., but a petition signed by 1,176 people -- 857 of them North Laurel residents -- suggest there is demand for a 24-hour station for those who stay out late or get up early. The County Board of Appeals will take a preliminary vote on the request tonight.
The article notes that in 1995 when the gas station was first proposed, residents objected to potential noise and light pollution from the gas station. Fifteen-foot trees planted between the station and the property stilled complaints from adjoining residents. Nevertheless, the local civic association claims that residents would be adversely affected by the new hours, although the business owner says "None of the four people who testified [against the new hours] can say they have the official capacity to represent the people who live next to the gas station."
The article goes on to say that some on the board question the petition, saying it was "flawed because it only asks people who support the request to sign it." The vote was scheduled to take place at a recent public hearing -- and at that point it seemed most of the board was in favor of granting the extension -- but some members had second thoughts and postponed the vote until tonight.
PUBLICATION: The Daily Oklahoman
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: Community Iii; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Ellie Sutter
DATELINE: Lyons Park, Oklahoma
The Daily Oklahoman reports that residents of Lyons Park, Oklahoma want a wall on Interstate 44. They want noise to be abated, but many are more concerned with the proximity of an elementary school playground to a dangerous section of the highway. At least three accidents have occurred in the last year during school hours. A wall was promised to residents in 1970 when the highway was first built.
The article notes that the transportation department gets more calls for a safety wall than for a noise wall; some wall proponents say that safety-related complaints could jeopardize the wall since there is more money available for a noise wall than for a safety wall. Currently, only a chain-link fence protects the playground from the highway; children are not allowed to use that area of the playground.
The article notes that a noise study was promised in June, but the results are not yet in.
PUBLICATION: The Dominion
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 3
BYLINE: Barnao Pete
DATELINE: Wellington, New Zealand
The Dominion reports that there is a push for review of restrictions that limit the number of loud shows at a local stadium, since a performer already scheduled for three nights could likely sell out two more shows if permitted. The tourism officer blames a few vocal residents for the limits, but a neighborhood resident said that residents simply accepted an offer from the stadium. There is always the chance that the performer will not exceed the decibel limit.
The article reports that the chief tourism officer in Wellington, New Zealand is pushing for review of restrictions that limit the number of loud shows at a local stadium. The Westpac Trust Stadium --which holds up too 20,000 people -- is only allowed six shows per year that exceed 75 decibels at the nearest neighbors property line. A performer scheduled for three nights at the stadium could sell out two more shows if not for the restrictions.
The article notes that the mayor has said he will push for a one-time exemption if noise becomes the limiting factor in allowing additional shows; there is always the chance that the performer will not exceed the decibel limit. The tourism officer blames a few vocal residents for the limits, but a neighborhood resident said "It was the stadium trustees that put forward those limitations. They recommended that they needed no more than six nights a year of very loud noise, [and] the residents accepted."
PUBLICATION: Multichannel News
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: No. 35, Vol. 20; Pg. 14 ; Issn: 0276-8593
BYLINE: Linda Haugsted
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
Multichannel News reports that a communications company in Orange County, California is slowing its deployment of telephone backup power supplies because of concerns over aesthetics, noise and safety. Natural gas powered systems are relatively loud, though the company has switched to smaller generators that produce less noise. Landscaping techniques are being looked into to protect aesthetics, and safety issues have been addressed through automatic shut-off systems.
The article reports that a communications company in Orange County, California is slowing its deployment of backup power supplies because of resident and municipal concerns on their placement. Concerns have included issues such as appearance, safety, and noise. Traditional battery-powered backup systems are relatively quiet, but natural gas powered systems that would last longer in case of an emergency are substantially louder. Residents also worried that a car crash could break the gas line open.
The article notes that the company is permitted by law to place the units wherever they want to, but are still working with residents and municipalities to compromise on appropriate placement. They say that automatic shutoff valves would prevent an explosion in the case of a gas-line rupture, and they also say that noise levels are reasonable: 58.4 decibels at 15 feet. Nevertheless, they have ordered lower-power generators that will presumably produce 54.5 decibels at 15 feet.
The article goes on to say that the power backups would insure that telephone and other communication services were operational in the case of a power outage.
The article notes that the issue of aesthetics is large in upscale neighborhoods, and landscaping techniques are being looked into to protect property values.
PUBLICATION: The Orlando Sentinel
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: Local & State; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Ludmilla Lelis
DATELINE: Orlando, Florida
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Patti Thompson, Save the Manatee Club biologist
The Orlando Sentinel reports that when protected manatees of Florida are killed by boat propellers, the reason may be that the manatees can't hear the boats. Some want to add high-frequency alarms to boat motors to warn manatees, but others say that the noise may do more harm than good by continually harassing the animals.
The article reports that when protected manatees of Florida are injured or killed by boat propellers, the reason may be that the manatees can't hear the boats. Manatees' hearing is adapted for high-frequency sounds as high as dog whistles, and boat motors emit mostly lower-frequency sounds.
The article notes that some want to add high-frequency alarms to boat motors to warn manatees of approaching boats. Others say that the noise may do more harm than good by continually harassing the animals out of the way. A state official asked the question "To what extent do we want to go ahead with scaring animals out of harm's way?" Critics of the proposed alarms also note that acceptance of an alarm could be used as an excuse to eliminate marine speed limits already in place to protect the creatures.
The article goes on to say that only 2,400 manatees live in Florida's waters, and last year 66 of them were killed by boat propellers.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 1C
BYLINE: Lee Drutman
DATELINE: North Smithfield, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that residents of North Smithfield, Rhode Island are opposing a 350-Megawatt power plant based on their fears of increased noise, traffic, and pollution. Residents have been very involved: more than ever in the community's history. The power plant, which has held one informational meeting and plans to hold more, believes that once they hear the facts, residents won't fear the plant anymore.
The article reports that residents of North Smithfield, Rhode Island are opposing a 350-Megawatt power plant based on their fears of increased noise, traffic, and pollution. The proposed plant will be built on a 25-acre plot near a Superfund toxic waste site -- closed for over twenty years -- and the community reservoir.
The article notes that residents have been very involved: more than ever in the community's history. Petitions against the plant carry hundreds of signatures, and several websites have been created that oppose the plant. Still, one activist acknowledged that many have a wait-and-see attitude, and only about 10% of the town seems to "know what's going on."
The article notes that one concern is the proximity of the site to the reservoir, meaning that "one mishap could be disastrous for the water supply of thousands of people." Another concern is the fate of the currently scenic view of the reservoir.
The article notes that the power company proposing the plant has held one informational meeting, and plans to hold another when they have researched answers to the residents questions and fears about the plant. They believe that once they hear the facts, residents won't fear the plant anymore.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 3C
BYLINE: Tony De Paul
DATELINE: Warwick, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that officials in Warwick, Rhode Island are hoping to revise the local noise ordinance to address noise emanating from loud car stereos. The new ordinance would allow police to ticket motorists for loud car stereos based on judgment.
The article reports that officials in Warwick, Rhode Island are hoping to revise the local noise ordinance to address noise emanating from loud car stereos. Currently, the noise ordinance is designed to deal with loud parties or concerts. Although the trip to retrieve the police department's decibel-meter may work in situations where the noise source is stationary, the same trip may mean that a mobile noise source is long gone.
The article notes that the new ordinance would allow police to ticket motorists for loud car stereos based on judgment. Legislators have the support of the Mayor, who supports the idea of going in the same direction as nearby Providence -- which has a similar ordinance.
PUBLICATION: The Times-Picayune
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Natalie Pompilio
DATELINE: New Orleans, Louisiana
The Times-Picayune reports that a noise wall design committee in New Orleans, Louisiana chose a design for a 10- to 24-foot noise wall that will line parts of a ten mile stretch of Interstate 10. The design includes local plants, and its choice was part of a $100,000 wall design process. The walls will go up in an area where residents are exposed to 180,000 vehicles each day and noise averages as high as 75 decibels.
The article reports that after research that included treks to Colorado and Florida, a noise wall design committee in New Orleans, Louisiana chose a design for a 10- to 24-foot noise wall that will line parts of a ten mile stretch of Interstate 10. The $25-million project includes artistic renditions of "tropical plants and palmetto leaves" intended to give visitors a sense of New Orleans.
The article notes that the design process itself will cost $100,000, although the artistic touches don't cost any additional money since special molds for soundwall panels must be produced in any case. Scores of designs were considered; many intricately detailed patterns were eliminated since motorists won't have time to see much detail at 60 mph. The botanical designs chosen draw the motorists eye down the roadway, making the walls appear shorter, and create shadows that make the wall looked two-toned.
The article goes on to say that the walls will go up in an area where residents are exposed to 180,000 vehicles each day and noise averages as high as 75 decibels. After public hearings last year, the committee decided to build the walls of concrete and to explore design options.
PUBLICATION: Ventura County Star
DATE: August 23, 1999
SECTION: Editorials; Pg. B07
BYLINE: Lynn M. Murray/Steve Buratti/Walter D. Hartley
DATELINE: Oxnard, California
The Ventura County Star prints several letters to the editor on the subject of noise from Oxnard Airport near South Fremont, California. One letter worries about safety at the airport, and says that no expansion should be allowed for this reason. Another letter states that expansion is "in direct conflict with the joint powers agreement and at the expense of the homeowners and residents in the area of the airport." A third letter says that another regional airport -- Camarillo -- should be considered as an option for handling increasing air traffic.
"More than a nuisance
At a recent South Fremont Neighborhood Council meeting, it was brought to my attention that the Board of Supervisors is considering expanding the air service provided at Oxnard Airport.
Of course, I oppose any increase in traffic. I live very close to the airport and the noise is a nuisance, compounded by possible hearing problems as a consequence. I knew the nuisance factor 14 years ago when I moved here. When I bought my house, I decided that I would manage the noise and not be a bother by calling the airport whenever my nerves were jangled.
If the board is considering increases because not many complaints have been made in Oxnard vs. Camarillo (which is much more amenable to traffic increase, since its landing strips are longer), figures on those who complain are based on assumption and supposition about whom would oppose the expansion of the airport.
Oxnard neighbors are very concerned about increases, and it isn't just about nuisance.
I've learned a few things that came to light during the years the old high school negotiated for the new Oxnard High School, to wit: Oxnard Airport's instrument landing system is displaced by 25 feet. Unless each and every pilot approaching or leaving the airport knows this, remembers this each time and compensates for it, danger of accident is increased an enormous amount. Additionally, the Oxnard Airport is not manned 24 hours per day.
However, even if the board corrected each of these situations, we're still looking at an airport that is right at the edge of urban development, and is of sufficient danger that it caused the movement of Oxnard High School out of harm's way.
So, now, are we going to move residential units and shopping centers out of harm's way?
Oxnard"
"Answers, please
I am commenting on this issue as a private citizen and in no official capacity. I am also writing as a person who lives with his family directly under the center of the approach path to runway 25 at Oxnard Airport.
My chief reason for writing is to support the recommendations of the Oxnard Airport Authority concerning the revised airport master plan and environmental impact report. As I understand the recommendations of the authority, they were to revisit the EIR to address the concerns made by the city's community development director, Dick Maggio. In summary, Maggio asked that:
In addition, I would like to request that one more topic be reviewed and that involves the type and numbers of commuter aircraft. I have to ask:
Also, according to Canadair regional jet specifications, you will find the noise levels of 92 to 98 decibels per approach is not something that you would care to live underneath.
Despite what some people have stated at the Airport Authority and the Aviation Advisory Commission, we are not trying to get the numbers in the reports lowered just because we don't like them. We are trying to determine where these numbers came from.
It seems that the groundwork has been thoroughly laid to transform Oxnard Airport into a major regional airport in direct conflict with the joint powers agreement and at the expense of the homeowners and residents in the area of the airport, if not the entire city of Oxnard!
Oxnard"
Consider Camarillo
I could not believe that a county supervisor would ask that a U.S. Navy air station be shared with a civilian air carrier. The Navy officers were very nice in their "no" response. There would be no security at all within a military complex. What an idiotic thought.
Sitting right here under the supervisors' noses is Camarillo Airport, county-owned. This airport has plenty of room for a terminal, parking areas, etc. It is close to Highway 101, making an easy access. The runway can handle the largest planes built.
You will get some static from some people in the area concerning jet noise -- the airline jets are about one-fourth the noise of the fighter jets that were here in the '60s, and they operated 10 times more than a few commercial airlines would fly in and out of this airport.
Whoever is in charge of this project, wake up!
Camarillo"
Previous week: August 15, 1999
Next week: August 29, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index