PUBLICATION: The Advocate
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 4-B;S
BYLINE: Vic Couvillion
DATELINE: Hammond, Louisiana
The Advocate reports that Hammond, Louisiana's City Council, which asked to develop noise laws months ago, may finally see "new proposals dealing with city alcohol permits and regulations procedures" this week. Residents have been complaining about noise from loud stereos, car stereos, and staged dog fights for at least five years.
The article reports that Hammond, Louisiana's City Council is getting impatient with its legal department which was asked to develop noise laws months ago. Residents have been complaining about noise from loud stereos, car stereos, and staged dog fights for at least five years.
The article notes that the city attorney's office promised to have "new proposals dealing with city alcohol permits and regulations procedures" available for the Council to review this week. The office said that one hold up has been the fact that the "administration inherited laws that might be unconstitutional."
The article goes on to say that the complaint that brought up the noise issue in this particular meeting was a car wash whose patrons play loud music at night. The city attorney said they could regulate the hours of operation at the car wash, but that bars wouldn't be so easy because the state has a hand in regulating them.
PUBLICATION: The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 2A
BYLINE: Colin Bessonette
DATELINE: Atlanta, Georgia
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution prints a question and answer column, which includes a question about why noise barriers have not been installed in front of certain highway-noise-impacted properties. The columnist answers that several criteria -- including a maximum cost per residence and a requirement that a noise wall must be part of a highway widening project -- must be met beyond the minimum 69 decibels of noise impact to qualify an area for a wall.
The article prints a question from a resident who asks why his property -- which was judged to be unacceptably "impacted" by highway noise on I-285 -- has not been protected with a noise wall as other residences have. The columnist answers that several criteria -- not just noise impact -- are considered before a noise wall is approved.
The article goes on to say that one additional requirement is that the cost of the noise wall not exceed $50,000 per residence protected from excessive noise. A third requirement is that the wall be constructed as part of a highway widening project. Unacceptable noise is considered to be "approaching or beyond 70 decibels", and so noise levels of 69 or higher are usually considered unacceptable.
PUBLICATION: Calgary Herald
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Comment; A11
BYLINE: Calgary Herald
DATELINE: Calgary, Canada
The Calgary Herald reports that a rail yard and repair shop -- which will be located within 600 feet of the General Hospital in Calgary -- should not create a noise problem. Repairs will be made inside, and whistles will not need to be blown when trains are shunting.
The article reports that a rail yard and repair shop -- which will be located within 600 feet of the General Hospital in Calgary -- should not create a noise problem. The editorial says that experienced people in similar rail yards elsewhere said that noise has not been a problem for residents.
The article notes that since repairs will be made inside -- and since the repair of boilers, a loud repair, is unlikely to take place there because of good water in the area -- noise should be low. Also, whistles will not need to be blown when trains are shunting, and a quieter bell can be used instead.
PUBLICATION: The Daily News of Los Angeles
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. N1
BYLINE: Lee Condon
DATELINE: Burbank, California
The Daily News of Los Angeles reports that California's Burbank Airport and Burbank's City Council have agreed on conditions for the building a new terminal. Critics of the agreement believe that the city of Burbank are "traitors", saying that the airport is still being allowed to build a larger terminal -- albeit with the same number of gates -- without a curfew that would help existing noise problems. Proponents of the plan claim that "There will be no expansion of the airport without protection against noise and traffic," and site other restrictions that give them control over the airport.
The article reports that California's Burbank Airport and Burbank's City Council have agreed on conditions for the building a new terminal. The terminal would be nearly double the size of the current one -- growing from 170,000 to 330,000 -- but would still have only 14 gates.
The article notes that critics of the agreement -- including a former city councilman -- believe that the city of Burbank are "traitors", saying that after $7-million in legal fees designed to force a curfew, the airport is still being allowed to build a larger terminal -- albeit with the same number of gates -- without a curfew that would help existing noise problems. They also note that a proposal to permanently block all eastern departures "locks in" noise patterns that are inequitably disturbing those west of the airport.
The article goes on to say that proponents of the plan claim that "none of the core principles long held by the city of Burbank have been compromised. There will be no expansion of the airport without protection against noise and traffic." Other restrictions would require a federally-approve curfew between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. if the airport wanted to expand from its current 14 gates to 16. To expand to 19, the airport would have to agree with the city to a cap on the number of passengers. Also, the airport must phase out noisy Phase 2 jets in five years, and close food concessions between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.
PUBLICATION: The Fort Worth Start-Telegram
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. 4
BYLINE: Gordon Dickson; Nora Coronado
DATELINE: Irving, Texas
The Fort Worth Start-Telegram reports that although several apartment complexes near Dallas/Fort Worth Airport in Irving, Texas will be soundproofed, many property owners don't wish to grant the permanent easement that is required before soundproofing takes place Only $3-million of the $18-million available has been spent.
The article reports that several apartment complexes near Dallas/Fort Worth Airport in Irving, Texas will be soundproofed with airport money. The airport set aside $18-million for soundproofing when it built its seventh runway, but less than $3-million has been used; many property owners don't wish to grant the permanent easement that is required before soundproofing takes place. The easement would mean that owners couldn't sue in the future over aircraft noise.
The article notes that "13 Irving apartment complexes, three schools and three churches" were identified as eligible for the soundproofing money, but only "five apartment complexes and one church" have taken advantage of the program so far.
The article concludes, noting that noise levels are measured before and after soundproofing takes place. Without soundproofing, average noise can reach 70 decibels near the airport; communities away from airports average between 50 and 55 decibels.
PUBLICATION: Japan Economic Newswire
DATE: August 5, 1999
DATELINE: Tokyo, Japan
The Japan Economic Newswire reports that the Japanese government has decided not to appeal a High Court decision that required a payment of 170 million yen to 134 residents who live near a noisy military base. Residents filed a suit in 1984 that the noise caused by aircraft activity at the base caused substantial mental anguish.
The article reports that the Japanese government has decided not to appeal a High Court decision that required a payment of 170 million yen to 134 residents who live near a noisy military base. Residents filed a suit in 1984 that the noise caused by aircraft activity at the base caused substantial mental anguish. Residents said they would accept the payment.
The article notes that the government was appealing a District Court ruling from 1992 in this High Court case. It will not appeal to the Supreme Court because previous Supreme Court rulings suggest that it would uphold the decision as well.
PUBLICATION: Kennebec Journal
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Tom Frey
DATELINE: Readfield, Maine
The Kennebec Journal reports that Readfield, Maine residents are upset over the Planning Board's approval of a wood chipper at the local transfer station. Residents worry that the noise and dust from the chipper could cause health problems and general disruption of the community. Station officials say that noise will be reduced by infrequent operation times, and dust will be reduced by chipping wood into a closed truck.
The article reports that Readfield, Maine residents are upset over the Planning Board's approval of a wood chipper at the local transfer station. Residents worry that the noise and dust from the chipper could cause health problems and general disruption of the community.
The article notes that residents have already fought pollution at the transfer station when they forced an investigation that had the station's burning permit revoked. They say that since the station couldn't guarantee that all wood would be untreated, dust could potentially be carcinogenic. One resident said "I have had cancer and I'd rather not get it again."
The article goes on to say that station officials claim dust will not be a problem, since wood will be chipped into a closed truck. They also say that operation will not happen weekly let alone daily, which means that noise will seldom be a problem. They said that a proposed alternative to chip wood at an out of town site would be 60% more expensive.
PUBLICATION: Leicester Mercury
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Politics: Mp's, Pg.1
DATELINE: Leicestershire, United Kingdom
The Leicester Mercury reports that a Commons representative from North West Leicestershire in the United Kingdom is calling for even more airport noise-control measures, especially at night, including restrictions on "the number of air traffic movements and the types of aircraft being operated, along with a control on the times of operation."
The article reports that a Commons representative from North West Leicestershire in the United Kingdom is calling for even more airport noise-control measures, especially at night. His constituents complain about East Midlands Airport, and he proposes going beyond new requirements such as quieter engines: the effectiveness of which is being offset by an increasing numbers of planes.
The article notes that the politician suggests restrictions on "the number of air traffic movements and the types of aircraft being operated, along with a control on the times of operation."
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Andrew Blankstein
DATELINE: Burbank, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that Burbank, California has reached an agreement with the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority over plans for expansion at Burbank Airport. A new terminal with the same number of gates has been approved in exchange for night closure of the building. Certain additional conditions must be met to allow the airport to expand to 16 and 19 gates from the current 14. Residents feel that the deal "is a total and complete sellout of the principles we have fought for for years." Los Angeles also dislikes the deal, because of a section that institutes a permanent ban on eastern takeoffs, shunting the overflight burden to L.A.
The article reports that Burbank, California has reached an agreement with the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority over plans for expansion at Burbank Airport. The airport can build a new $300-million terminal with the same number of gates and 5000 more parking spaces, though it will be closed from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. to discourage night flights. To expand to 16 gates and add 1000 more parking spaces, the airport must obtain FAA approval for a night curfew between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. To reach 19 gates and add 2000 more parking spaces -- which would be the end of permitted expansion -- the two parties must agree on a cap on numbers of passengers and no residents may experience more than an average of 64 decibels of noise.
The article notes that both parties are hailing the agreement as a win-win solution to the 29-year legal battle against airport expansion that has cost Burbank $6-million. Residents -- who will have their say in a series of public meetings before the City Council approves the deal -- feel that the deal doesn't go far enough, saying "This is a total and complete sellout of the principles we have fought for for years." Los Angeles also dislikes the deal, because of a section that institutes a permanent ban on eastern takeoffs; L.A. would prefer a more equitable distribution of the noise -- including eastern takeoffs over Burbank to ease the burden on L.A. to the west -- and are suing the airport authority to force a stronger environmental impact study.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 3; Metro Desk
BYLINE: Rebecca Harris, (949) 574-4205
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that Los Angles will pay for additional soundproofing for several homes near a busy street as part of a widening project.
The article reports that Los Angles will pay for additional soundproofing for several homes near a busy street as part of a widening project. It will cost $29,517 to "replace and reinforce windows and air-conditioning units" on seven affected buildings.
PUBLICATION: New Times Los Angeles
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Columns
BYLINE: Jill Stewart
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The New Times Los Angeles prints an amusing, sarcastic, no-punches-pulled column against a recent Los Angeles Airport Commission 'plan' to reduce noise that allows noisy, private jets of celebrities and corporate types to continue flights out of Van Nuys Airport until 2010. "By that time, areas near the jets' extensive flight patterns will be nothing more than slums-in-training." She discusses history of the problem, common airport excuses, the names of the jet owners who would rather not be named, and one-sided economic justifications.
The article prints an amusing, sarcastic, no-punches-pulled column against a recent Los Angeles Airport Commission 'plan' to reduce noise that allows noisy, private jets of celebrities and corporate types to continue flights out of Van Nuys Airport until 2010. "By that time, areas near the jets' extensive flight patterns will be nothing more than slums-in-training." The spark for the column was a public hearing in which the public was treated "like it was a big, fat favor if they got to speak at the microphone."
The column notes that the city council and mayor promised over ten years ago to get Stage 2 private jets out of Van Noise airport; the noisy planes are already restricted or banned at several California airport. The columnist suggests that after wealthy jet owners made campaign contributions, the stance was reversed allowing the jets to grown in number. Currently, 15,000 takeoffs and landings from 50 jets affect up to 100,000 homes in the area each year.
The column colorfully states that although the press generally says that the airport was there first, this is misleading. While the airport was there before many homes, it only became a noisy neighbor after 1965. The noise at the airport -- which, unrestricted, became the world's busiest general-aviation airport as other communities restricted their own -- increased dramatically and "neighborhood neglect, business-district tawdriness, and crime [was] spawned...."
The columnist spends a lot of time discussing how the famous and wealthy prefer to use Van Nuys because they won't have as much contact with regular people, or tourists. She names names of these celebrities, as well as the names of many corporations who "really do not want to be identified by corporate name because it is a political problem now, and it is also not in their best interests to be involved by name...."
The column alleges that a Department of Airports 'economic study' was undertaken to please one particular man who charters the jets at the airport; his jets account for 10% of Stage 2 operations at the airport. The economic study details monetary losses if the planes were banned, but economists told the columnist that it fails to "measure the neighborhood upgrading, return of shops, and rise in property values that would occur...."
PUBLICATION: Orange County Register
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Community; Pg. 01
BYLINE: Melissa Morris; Brady Rhoades; Christina Almeida
DATELINE: Orange County, California
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Allan Beek, member of Stop Polluting Our Newport
The Orange County Register reports that if the proposed airport at the former El Toro Marines Base in Orange County, California is not approved, John Wayne Airport may be expanded. Critics of that plan fear it would bring increased problems with environment, traffic, noise and property values. Some also believe that El Toro would help tourism and business in the area, although critics say that only select businesses would be helped while others were hurt.
The article reports that if the proposed airport at the former El Toro Marines Base in Orange County, California is not approved, John Wayne Airport may be expanded. Expansion there could exacerbate environmental, noise, property value, and traffic problems that are already present. John Wayne currently operates at approximately half capacity -- serving 7.5 million passengers annually -- but expansion could be possible in 2005 with the expiration of a 1985 agreement with Newport Beach designed to rein in growth.
The article considers several problems that would increase with expansion. There is concern over noise, and pollution as it affects people and endangered species nesting in the area; many say they already won't go outside or keep their windows open at certain times of the year. Traffic could increase in some areas, although northbound traffic to other airports may decrease. Property values are already affected so that similar houses in different neighborhoods can sell for $100,000 less near the airport.
The article also notes that the Newport Harbor Area Chamber of Commerce believes that expansion is impossible on John Wayne's 500 acres, and says that Newport Beach would receive more money from tourism and business visitors if El Toro was built. Also, fares would likely be cheaper than at John Wayne, where cost keeps many travelers away. An El Toro airport could also increase business efficiency in the area, though critics say that small businesses and residents would suffer while certain select corporations benefited.
PUBLICATION: The Orlando Sentinel
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Lake Sentinel; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Glory Patterson
DATELINE: Tavares, Florida
The Orlando Sentinel reports that although Tavares, Florida has now passed a noise ordinance, it conspicuously lacks 'teeth' in the form of specific standards. Residents began asking for an ordinance because of repeated noise disturbances from a particular restaurant.
The article notes that several council members voted against the ordinance: one thought it was unnecessary, and one thought that specific decibel limits were needed. The lawyer for the restaurant agrees, saying that "to protect his clients and nearby residents", specific decibel limits would have been better.
The article goes on to say that police will decide who is violating the law by considering how close noise is to sleeping areas, and what time of day the noise occurs. The wording of the ordinance prohibits noise that "endangers or injures the health of humans or animals, unduly disrupts or disturbs the quiet enjoyment in the area and is sufficient to annoy and disturb occupants of premises other than those premises from which the noise is emanating." Violations will bring a $250 fine. Community activities, construction, landscaping, and refuse collection are exempt from the ordinance.
PUBLICATION: The Patriot Ledger
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 17C
BYLINE: Kimberly W. Moy
DATELINE: Milton, Massachusetts
The Patriot Ledger reports that Milton, Massachusetts' airplane noise committee voted unanimously to support a new $22-million, 5,000 foot runway at Boston's Logan Airport. They say that the new runway will help reduce the percentage of takeoffs made to the west of the airport. Many in South Boston -- traditionally a less wealthy area -- oppose the new runway which would send more flights over their communities. Projections show a 3.4 % increase in flights at Logan, regardless of whether the new runway is approved.
The article reports that Milton, Massachusetts' airplane noise committee voted unanimously to support a new $22-million, 5,000 foot runway at Boston's Logan Airport, in connection with the "development of regional airports and high-speed rail." Committee members say that the new runway will help reduce the percentage of takeoffs made to the west of the airport; this is a priority, since noise there is in excess of community goals set in the 1980's. While the runway will increase noise in communities to the east, the noise will still be under community goals in those areas. Although control tower officials seemed committed to the community noise goals, safety concerns always take priority.
The article notes that many in South Boston -- traditionally a less wealthy area -- oppose the new runway which would send more flights over their communities. Critics of the runway claim that an environmental justice law, which says that noise can be increased over traditionally poor communities only with compelling reason, is being skirted by the committee. In response, residents have "threatened to withdraw support of the community noise goals." Airport officials mock the effort, saying that if environmental justice was a real issue, a recent flight path shift from a wealthier area to a low-income area never would have been demanded by residents.
The article notes that projections show a 3.4 % increase in flights at Logan, regardless of whether the new runway is approved. This apparently counters the traditional anti-noise argument that a new runway will always lead to more growth in the long term.
The article notes that efforts to reduce delays at the airport has been part of the cause for many growing numbers of flights to the west. The runways that send airplanes to the west can handle more flights per hour than the runways that send airplanes east; the new runway would make the capacities equal.
PUBLICATION: The Providence Journal-Bulletin
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News, Pg. 1D
BYLINE: Ron Cassinelli
DATELINE: Narragansett, Rhode Island
The Providence Journal-Bulletin reports that in a three-way race for a town council seat in Narragansett, Rhode Island, noise has arisen as an issue. All the candidates agree that the noise ordinance should be reviewed.
The article reports that in a three-way race for a town council seat in Narragansett, Rhode Island, noise has arisen as an issue. Loud car stereos and modified motorcycle mufflers create a problem. One candidate said it would be important to set standards that could be enforced without sound meters. Another candidate suggested options employed in other towns, such as a maximum distance from which sounds can be heard.
PUBLICATION: The Record
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. L02
BYLINE: Evonne Coutros
DATELINE: Glen Rock, New Jersey
The Record reports that several residences have gathered 60 signatures from those who are disturbed by excessive train whistles in Glen Rock, New Jersey. Passenger and Freight companies say they are just following state and federal rules, but the Federal Railroad Administration says that railroads submit their own whistle guidelines for approval. A pending request to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) would allow engineers to blow the whistles less often if special 'quad gates' are installed at intersections to deter motorists from crossing the tracks when a train is coming
The article reports that several residences have gathered 60 signatures from those who are disturbed by excessive train whistles in Glen Rock, New Jersey. Residents say the whistles have been increasing in frequency and volume in recent years. Whistles are "heaviest between 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m., but [also] after midnight through 3 a.m...." In addition to the petition, residents have sent letters to local, state, and national representatives.
The article notes that NJ Transit -- a passenger-train company -- is required to blow the whistles for certain durations and at certain times. He does admit that some engineers might be 'leaning on the whistles', and has promised to address the matter. He also notes that a pending request to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) would allow engineers to blow the whistles less often if special 'quad gates' are installed at intersections to deter motorists from crossing the tracks when a train is coming. The freight company which operates on the tracks -- Norfolk Southern -- have state and federal regulations they must obey when sounding whistles.
The article goes on to say that FRA officials said that regulations are actually submitted by the railroads themselves, and only approved by the FRA. This seems to agree with resident's observations that whistles are sounded inconsistently. One resident said "My big objection is some come through real nice and others lay on the whistle for as far as you can hear."
PUBLICATION: The Salt Lake Tribune
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Final; Pg. D6
BYLINE: Brandon Loomis
DATELINE: Farmington, Utah
The Salt Lake Tribune reports that noise walls -- proposed along Farmington Utah's Interstate 15 -- are as source of local disagreement. Council members want more time to study more aesthetic alternatives, but residents have forced a public initiative vote that could overrule a 'no' vote by the council. Utah's Department of Transportation (UDOT) has offered to build the walls along Interstate 15, but the council is studying alternatives such as earthen berms and trees.
The article reports that noise walls -- proposed along Farmington Utah's Interstate 15 -- are as source of local disagreement. Council members want more time to study more aesthetic alternatives, but residents don't want to wait. The council is set to vote in October, but residents have forced a public initiative vote for November that could override the council. The vote will take place in November as well, and will only be necessary if the council votes against the noise walls.
The article notes that Utah's Department of Transportation (UDOT) has offered to build the walls along Interstate 15, but the funding deadline is November 19. The public vote was forced by a petition of 1,000 signatures that supporters of the walls gathered. Residents concerned about their children's safety -- since kids can't hear their parents over the traffic noise -- asked the council, "is [avoiding 20 seconds of driving in view of a concrete wall] worth the life of a child?"
The article goes on to say that the council is holding out because of communities around the country that are asking for ugly sound walls to be removed. Alternatives include "a grassy berm or trees, though [there may not be] enough median room for those to work as well as a 15-foot wall. Some residents also scoff at the idea of sound walls, asking if the residents noticed the highway when they moved here.
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Opinion Pg. B-11
BYLINE: Charles Hannum, Colleen Dossey, Victoria Grant, Ron LoLordo, Gordon Keiser
DATELINE: San Diego, California
The San Diego Union-Tribune prints a series of letters to the editor from residents who are upset about an eastern flight path for helicopters from San Diego's Miramar military base. The letters allege that the flight path will impact middle-class people more than the rich, and say that just because the flight path will affect fewer people doesn't mean it's better. Residents say that although they knew of the base when they moved in, they didn't know the flight paths would be moved over their heads and be used increasingly for louder aircraft. Some alternative routes are suggested.
"New routes for helicopters leave protests in their wake
I have to take issue with what San Diego Mayor Susan Golding and the San Diego Association of Governments said in proposing a new flight route for the helicopters out of Miramar. A summary of their position was that since East County doesn't have as many residents, they don't matter. Which is to say, I suppose, that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
How dare they speak so carelessly of our needs! Let me see, did the military move into Miramar after homes were built around the base? Or were the homes built up around the base? If the residents don't like the noise from an airport, air station or air base, then, gee whiz, why move into the neighborhood?
When I bought my home in Santee, I certainly took into account the kinds of things people usually look for before moving somewhere -- schools, shopping, businesses nearby, traffic, noisy neighbors. Since we didn't move into a flight corridor for Miramar, then moving it over our heads is not the right answer, and Golding, SANDAG and the Marines need to sit down and come up with a realistic solution. CHARLES HANNUM Santee"
"We moved to Eucalyptus Hills in Lakeside 13 years ago from Ocean Beach, which, although it had an ocean handy, was extremely noisy with all those inconvenient passenger aircraft flying overhead.
So, we went east where we could hear the red-tailed hawks, doves, mocking bids and crows fly overhead instead of planes. We also enjoy coyote howls, donkeys, peacocks and assorted wild and domesticated animal sounds.
When the Navy resided at Miramar, we got the occasional jets in the afternoon high overhead, an occasional sonic boom, but nothing to complain about. It was what we had bargained for when we bought here.
Since the Marine helicopters moved in, it has changed. I have been awakened from a sound sleep after midnight to the noise of the copters and my windows rattling on more than a few occasions. It's so loud during the day sometimes that even with windows closed and the air-conditioner on it's hard to have a conversation. I sympathize with people around Miramar, but I'm sure most of them knew the base was there before they bought.
Out here, there may not be more of us, but we don't want all that noise shoveled this way because we don't vote in mayoral elections and we don't have a paid political organization pushing to move those noisemakers north along the flight path the Navy used.
Can't they fly north of the Eucalyptus Hills and Santee and south of Poway? There's open space over Sycamore Canyon and hardly anything until you get to Miramar.
The plan being considered now will have the helicopters turning at state Route 67 directly over our house, while just north of us is nothing but chaparral. COLLEEN DOSSEY Lakeside"
"What a relief it is that this is America, where any unfortunate unpleasantness can be eradicated simply by throwing wads of cash at it.
If I were a millionaire, I could plop my house down in a shipping lane and sue San Diego because the boats were splashing me! No doubt Mayor Golding would endorse my claim, and the city would route the bay traffic across a " less populated" area. Then The San Diego Union-Tribune could run an editorial chastising East County residents for whining about it. ("Hey, run the cargo ships through Santee Lakes! Ain't no sensitive millionaires out there! And you know those rednecks can't hear a thing over the sound of gunshots and karaoke bars!")
All the money, political pressure and privilege in the world do not change the truth. And the truth of this matter is that the City of San Diego is following what is perceived as the path of least resistance. Middle-class Santee means nothing to San Diego -- or your newspaper. But spare us the feeble rationalizations and patronizing airs.
The last thing we need is a bunch of smug, spoiled sycophants and socialites whining at us to "stop whining" about the trash they propose to toss in our laps. VICTORIA GRANT Santee"
"The report on the proposed eastern alternate routes for the helicopters suggests that they would impact fewer residents than the existing one along I- 15.
An examination of the map reveals that each of the two would fly over the proposed Fanita Ranch development in Santee. What impact will that have on the economic viability of that project, by far the largest development in Santee's history? I doubt if purchasers of high-end housing would tolerate the high noise levels under the flight paths.
Although I am in favor of Fanita Ranch, the noise issue needs to be resolved before the coming election. RON LoLORDO Santee"
"I'm not exactly sure, but aren't those helicopters kind of gas guzzlers? And isn't it somewhat out of the way to have to travel so far east?
But I'm an old softy, so this is what I propose: Keep the existing path, the proposed new easterly route and come up with a westerly route in addition. Then alternate the routes, say, every other week.
That way everybody, not just a lucky few, have to endure it but it's not as constant. Geez, what's so hard about that? GORDON KEISER Lakeside"
PUBLICATION: Sarasota Herald-Tribune
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: B Section, Pg. 3B
BYLINE: John Hielscher
DATELINE: Sarasota, Florida
The Sarasota Herald-Tribune reports that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is refining its plans for a sharper left turn to be used by aircraft at Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport in Florida. The turn will reduce noise for many on the mainland, but some people -- though the FAA notes the number is smaller than those helped on the mainland -- on Longboat Key will be subjected to increased noise.
The article goes on to say that an environmental assessment should be completed by fall, at which point a public comment period of 60 days will begin. The environmental assessment was originally completed last November, but the FAA decided to include projections until 2005 and 2010 at the last minute.
The article concludes by saying that about half of 17 daily jets commercial jets will use the turn, though critics of the turn warn that the number of flights could increase to 26 next year.
PUBLICATION: Sun-Sentinel
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. 6B
BYLINE: Tamika Simmons
DATELINE: Davie, Florida
The Sun-Sentinel reports that a resident of Davie, Florida is disturbed by noise from the local rodeo grounds. Two years after he sent a letter and petition to local officials, asking them to somehow enclose the noise, he hasn't gotten a response. The three departments that he has been referred to over the years say they are still "working on [it]."
The article reports that a resident of Davie, Florida is disturbed by noise from the local rodeo grounds. The resident admits that the grounds are an important local tradition, but he wants to somehow enclose the noise from screaming fans.
The article notes that after he circulated a petition two years ago in his trailer park, he only received 6 signatures after visiting 60 neighbors; he said many people are reluctant to address the problem. Nevertheless, he sent the letter to officials. The Code Enforcement Department, the Mayor, and the Police Department has shuffled the resident back and forth between them for two years, and all the mayor can say after all this time is "It's something we're working on."
PUBLICATION: The Toronto Star
DATE: August 5, 1999
SECTION: News
BYLINE: Cynthia Walker
DATELINE: Toronto, Canada
The Toronto Star prints a letter to the editor from a Toronto resident who is fed up with noise from street festivals. She says that her busy work week leaves her exhausted, and weekend festivals make it impossible to relax and recover. She says street festivals should be at least 500 meters from residences.
"Regarding the story about the Celebrate Toronto festival, Having a ball (July 12). Please note that many of us definitely were not. I was, but only because I had fled, at considerable expense, to Montreal.
My apartment overlooks Yonge just north of Eglinton. Upon hearing that we would be assaulted by yet another street festival, I became physically ill and could do nothing but make plans to escape. Many people lack the resources to do so; I could ill afford it, but I had no choice.
In the previous street festival last July and in the winter festival earlier this year, the noise and crowds were unbearable, unnecessary and exhausting. The midway rides are far too big and noisy for placement anywhere near residences (as is also true of most amplified musical performances).
Throughout the Sunday of the winter festival, a van from one of the sponsors blasted the broadcast of a local radio station, the noise from which penetrated the very fibre of every living being for blocks around. That it was utterly gratuitous and added nothing to the pleasure of those at ground level was even more insulting.
I have confirmed with neighbours that this year's spectacle was no less offensive.
Street festivals are profoundly disruptive for local residents. You cannot escape the noise ; sounds of higher frequency such as music or screeching midway rides cannot be masked by "white noise. " You cannot hear anything but the carnival, much less your own thoughts.
You cannot complete normal weekend errands that must be done to prepare for the coming work week. You cannot relax. You cannot obtain any peace in your own residence.
At Broadway, we are but across Yonge from the local firehall, yet our access to emergency services is hopelessly cut off. At the same time, some local businesses suffer because their regular clientele cannot patronize them through the madding crowds. Others gouge while the gouging is good.
If Mayor Mel Lastman wants to put a circus in someone's front yard, let it be his own. Indeed, I defy him to live on the CNE midway for a weekend this summer and still show up bright and perky for his job Monday morning. It won't be easy.
No street festival event should be within 500 metres of any residence. There also is no need to celebrate the "unification" of Toronto yet again.
Parties should be in parks, where they belong. Leave those who cannot party all weekend the space and peace they need - and for which they have paid handsomely - to cope with their own busy lives."
PUBLICATION: Asheville Citizen-Times
DATE: August 4, 1999
SECTION: Local; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Jenn Burleson
DATELINE: Montford, North Carolina
The Asheville Citizen-Times reports that Montford, North Carolina residents are being disturbed by noise from loud car stereos and reckless drivers, especially at night. A new ordinance is being considered which would raise the $50 fine for repeat offenders. Police find the current ordinance difficult to enforce since in most cases neither officers nor residents have actually witnessed the crime being committed; they are trying to create a community watch, and are increasing patrols in the area.
The article reports that Montford, North Carolina residents are being disturbed by noise from loud car stereos and reckless drivers, especially at night. In the first half of this year, police received 95 noise-related complaints and 12 reports of reckless driving in the area.
The article goes on to say that a new ordinance is being considered which would raise the $50 fine for repeat offenders. The ordinance may be ready for council consideration next month.
The article notes that police find the current ordinance difficult to enforce since in most cases neither officers nor residents have actually witnessed the crime being committed. Police are trying to create a community watch, and are increasing patrols in the area. When one resident who was watching for offenders confronts people, she is usually blown off with comments like "you don't own this street."
PUBLICATION: Bangor Daily News
DATE: August 4, 1999
BYLINE: Tom Groening
DATELINE: Camden, Maine
The Bangor Daily News reports that a Camden, Maine Bed and Breakfast owner wants the town to change its noise ordinance to include early morning construction on private property. He says street work in the summer meant jackhammers as early as 6 a.m. , and meant guests leaving earlier than planned. Town officials say that disturbing noises aren't always loud enough in decibels to violate the noise ordinance, but that police responding to a complaint would have agreed that a jackhammer at 6 a.m. was unreasonable.
The article reports that a Camden, Maine Bed and Breakfast owner wants the town to change its noise ordinance to include early morning construction on private property. The owner's neighbor -- whom he says is generally considerate -- allows his building contractor to begin renovation work as early as 7 a.m. Also, street work in the summer meant jackhammers as early as 6 a.m. The owner says he loses money because of such incidents because guests leave earlier than planned.
The article notes that while town officials say that disturbing noises aren't always loud enough in decibels to violate a noise ordinance, the owner says he wants an ordinance that would be general enough to interpret the 'irritation' level, as in a local barking-dog ordinance. He thinks that police responding to a complaint would have agreed that a jackhammer at 6 a.m. was unreasonable.
The article notes that the current ordinance was designed to address loud music on town-owned property or parks. It also includes a specific decibel limit.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Sun-Times
DATE: August 4, 1999
SECTION: Nws; Pg. 14
BYLINE: Dan Rozek
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Betty Skyles, a member of Elgin's Save Our Streets
The Chicago Sun-Times reports that several suburbs around Chicago have been fighting an epidemic of loud car stereos by impounding cars and issuing fines of up to $500. Some police departments are allowed to use their own judgment to determine violators, while some communities have set distances -- such as 75 feet -- at which noise can not be audible. Courts generally allow police to impound cars when the driver breaks a specific law, although the American Civil Liberties Union says it's a "quick fix."
The article reports that several suburbs around Chicago have been fighting an epidemic of loud car stereos by impounding cars and issuing fines of up to $500.
The article notes that in Elgin, 350 tickets have been written already this year. 6,800 vehicles have been towed in Chicago for loud music in the last two years. Fines in the various communities range up to $500, and they may be in addition to a vehicle-retrieval fee of $500. Some police departments are allowed to use their own judgment to determine violators, while some communities have set distances -- such as 75 feet -- at which noise can not be audible.
The article goes on to say that one young driver was asked by police how he stands the volume of his stereo, he said "I wear earplugs."
The article says that courts generally allow police to impound cars when the driver breaks a specific law, although the American Civil Liberties Union says it's a "quick fix."
PUBLICATION: The Indianapolis Star
DATE: August 4, 1999
SECTION: Metro North; Pg. N01
BYLINE: Tina King
DATELINE: Carmel, Indiana
The Indianapolis Star reports that Carmel, Indiana has passed a new noise ordinance that includes fines ranging from $250 to $2,500; it forbids 90 decibels as measured from six feet away, and any audible noise from forty feet away. Officers will respond to noise complaints armed with decibel meters and tape measures. Some council members were worried that the stricter rules were getting into "government overkill" mode.
The article reports that Carmel, Indiana has passed a new noise ordinance that includes fines ranging from $250 to $2,500. The ordinance also forbids 90 decibels as measured from six feet away, and any audible noise from forty feet away.
The article notes that police will now purchase several decibel meters. Officers will not search out violators, but will responds to noise complaints armed with the decibel meters and tape measures.
The article notes that in their revision of the ordinance, some council members were worried that the stricter rules were getting into "government overkill" mode.
The article concludes, noting that in addition to changes affecting car stereos, the ordinance was changed to allow "lawn mowers, leaf blowers and construction equipment [to] be operated from 6 a.m." instead of 7 a.m.
PUBLICATION: The Irish Times
DATE: August 4, 1999
SECTION: Home News; Pg. 7
BYLINE: Roddy O'sullivan
DATELINE: Baldonnel, Ireland
The Irish Times reports that a proposed new airport in Baldonnel, Ireland would irritate residents of several upscale Dublin suburbs. The airports flight path would pass over suburbs at altitudes as low as 1,000 feet, and that even if the airline reduced its noise intensity, the frequency of flights "can be as disturbing as the actual noise, particularly at night."
The article reports that a proposed new airport in Baldonnel, Ireland would irritate residents of several upscale Dublin suburbs. According to an Air Corps official, who works at the military base next to the proposed site of the commercial airport, says the airports flight path would pass over suburbs at altitudes as low as 1,000 feet.
The article notes that the problem will be exacerbated by at least 23 Stage 2 aircraft -- known for their noise -- owned by an airline that would operate at the facility. The Air Corps officer noted that even if the airline reduced its noise intensity, the frequency of flights "can be as disturbing as the actual noise, particularly at night."
PUBLICATION: News & Record
DATE: August 4, 1999
SECTION: People & Places, Pg. 2
BYLINE: Paul Bergen
DATELINE: Greensboro, North Carolina
The News & Record reports that a group of residents, business leaders, and local planners have agreed on a development plan for Greensboro, North Carolina, influenced by potential noise from a proposed new airport runway. There will be a moratorium on providing city services such as water and sewer in potential high-noise areas to discourage development.
The article reports that a group of residents, business leaders, and local planners have agreed on a development plan for Greensboro, North Carolina. Expected noise from a proposed Federal Express Runway at Piedmont Triad International Airport airport affected some aspects of the plan.
The article notes that one 726-acre area was identified as an area where airport noise could be a problem; there will be a moratorium on providing city services such as water and sewer in the area to discourage development.
PUBLICATION: Portland Press Herald
DATE: August 4, 1999
SECTION: Coast & State, Pg. 2B, Dispatches
DATELINE: Bath, Maine
The Portland Press Herald reports that Bath, Maine's Bath Iron Works plans to hold a public meeting this week to discuss its sometimes-noisy construction in the Kennebec River. Pile-driving scheduled for later this year has the potential to be loud, and residents want to assure quiet.
The article reports that Bath, Maine's Bath Iron Works plans to hold a public meeting this week to discuss its sometimes-noisy construction in the Kennebec River. Their $218-million expansion project has been quiet recently according to residents, but pile-driving scheduled for later this year has the potential to be much louder.
The article notes that the company is allowed to work around the clock, although the town is allowed to put limits on the noise that escapes the property.
PUBLICATION: Chapel Hill Herald
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Front; Pg. 1;
BYLINE: Ray Gronberg
DATELINE: Chapel Hill, North Carolina
The Chapel Hill Herald reports that noise from a country-club fan designed to circulate air around putting-green grass has caused a council member to propose a short-term solution revision to the ordinance that forbids "continuous" noise. After almost two years of complaints from a resident, the council is considering lower decibel limits, though the decision is several months away.
The article reports that after repeated noise complaints from a resident living near a country-club fan designed to circulate air around putting-green grass, a council member has decided to propose a short-term solution. After a recent phone call from the resident, the council member decided to propose a revision to the ordinance that forbids "continuous" noise, while continuing to exempt agriculture equipment that is designed for tasks of short duration.
The article notes that after almost two years of complaints from the resident, the council is currently considering recommendations by a council study panel to lower decibel limits. The current ordinance -- which the country club is not violating -- "exempts 'lawn mowers, agricultural equipment and landscape maintenance equipment' from noise limits between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m."
The article goes on to say that the country club has switched fan position and type in an attempt to reduce noise levels.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Standard
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: News; Local; Pg. 3
DATELINE: Palmerston North, New Zealand
The Evening Standard reports that a resident of Palmerston North complained to the City Council and the SPCA that a recent motorbike race in the area "must have been distressed" by the noise. City officials said that the event was "fully assessed" and open to public comment, although none were made. The curator of the aviary "said there was no evidence the birds were stressed." The SPCA said it would investigate the matter when more information was available.
The article reports that a resident of Palmerston North complained to the City Council and the SPCA that a recent motorbike race in the area "must have been distressed" by the noise. City officials said that the event -- though not a typical use for the "Esplanade" -- was "fully assessed" and open to public comment, although none were made.
The article notes that the curator of the aviary "said there was no evidence the birds were stressed," saying that "The starting pistol for the skaters, and the hockey lights at this time of the year, probably cause more problems." The SPCA said it would investigate the matter when more information was available.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Standard
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: News; Local; Pg. 3
BYLINE: Myers John
DATELINE: Palmerston North, New Zealand
The Evening Standard reports that since an unpopular noise variance granted by Palmerston North, New Zealand's City Council has expired, the council is working towards stricter noise limits for night-time jet-engine testing. The council now supports a required enclosure for any night-time engine testing. Proposed limits include a maximum of 70 decibels as measured from a residential boundary, and a maximum hourly average of 55 decibels, "with an allowable rise one night a month to 60."
The article reports that since a noise variance granted by Palmerston North, New Zealand's City Council has expired, the council is working towards stricter noise limits for night-time jet-engine testing. The variance was granted for "Saab airliner servicing for Air Nelson", but "The strength of opposition to the variation . . . demonstrates that residents perceive a significant adverse effect from night-time engine testing."
The article notes that the council now supports a required enclosure for any night-time engine testing. Enclosures already in use at a nearby airport reduce sound and are constructed with "sea cargo containers and hay bales."
The article goes on to say that proposed limits include a maximum of 70 decibels as measured from a residential boundary, and a maximum hourly average of 55 decibels, "with an allowable rise one night a month to 60." The maximum level suggested by New Zealand is 75 decibels.
PUBLICATION: The Gloucester Citizen
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Pg.5
DATELINE: Bream, United Kingdom
The Gloucester Citizen reports that a proposal to build forty houses near a noisy, smelly chicken farm in Bream, U.K. has met with resistance from the District Council.
The article reports that a proposal to build forty houses near a chicken farm in Bream, U.K. has met with resistance from the District Council. Councillors say that the noise and odor from the farm, which has been minimized according to environmental health officials, is such that it is "impossible to open doors and windows and to hang out washing." While the councillors will allow the houses to be built, it is suggested that the developers think carefully.
PUBLICATION: The Herald Express
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Advisories, Pg.2
BYLINE: Allan Tudor
DATELINE: Torbay, United Kingdom
The Herald Express reports that a pub in Torbay, United Kingdom is causing numerous noise complaints after it received a license to operate late at night. The owner says the complaints are made mainly by elderly people, and that he has never had any problems inside the bar.
The article reports that a pub in Torbay, United Kingdom that has just received a license to operate past midnight is causing numerous noise complaints. Police say they are monitoring the situation.
The article notes that the owner says the complaints are made mainly by elderly people, and that he has never had any problems inside the bar. He admits that patrons tend to talk outside, especially in the warmer months.
PUBLICATION: Knoxville News-Sentinel
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: A Section; Pg. A4
BYLINE: Don Jacobs
The Knoxville News-Sentinel reports that after two noise citations in one night, a Knoxville, Tennessee bar has canceled its live music and launched a call-in campaign against the City Council's noise ordinance. The noise ordinance sets a decibel limit of 80 before midnight and 75 after, although the bar owner said bands need 90 decibels.
The article reports that after two noise citations in one night, a Knoxville, Tennessee bar has canceled its live music and launched a call-in campaign against the City Council's noise ordinance. The owner of the club says that the noise ordinance -- which sets a before-midnight limit of 80 decibels and an after-midnight limit of 75 decibels -- won't allow a live band to play comfortably. He is proposing a 90 decibel limit, which will allow the live music that draws patrons to his bar.
The article notes that an officer cited the bar for music at 92 decibels before midnight, and at 84 decibels -- while the band was not even playing -- after midnight.
The article notes that the ordinance also forbids music from being easily heard 50 feet away from a vehicle. On the night the citations were issued to the bar, two other noise citations were issued to bars and 55 citations were issued to motorists with loud car stereos.
PUBLICATION: Knoxville News-Sentinel
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: A Section; Pg. A1
BYLINE: Richard Powelson
DATELINE: Knoxville, Tennessee
The Knoxville News-Sentinel reports that Knoxville's McGhee Tyson Airport will soon receive $3.2-million from the federal government, $2.6-million of which will help pay for past noise mitigation. Additional land may be purchased with the money as well. The airport authority hopes to perform another $6-million in noise abatement work; it will be responsible for 10% of the costs.
The article reports that Knoxville's McGhee Tyson Airport will soon receive $3.2-million from the federal government, $2.6-million of which will help pay for noise mitigation. Noise reduction measures have included the soundproofing of homes and the purchase of undeveloped land where development could lead to future noise conflicts.
The article notes that although 400 acres farmland has already been bought, 103 additional acres near the airport may be purchased as a buffer. The airport authority notes that it has tried to be proactive in its noise abatement measures, and consequently has fewer noise complaints than other airports of similar size.
The article notes that the money will pay for about half of the soundproofing costs that the airport authority has incurred. The authority itself is responsible for 10 percent of soundproofing costs. The recent grant is in addition to $2.4-million received in 1997; the authority hopes to receive help with $6-million of additional soundproofing work in the future.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 4; Zones Desk
BYLINE: Andrew Blankstein
DATELINE: Burbank, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that Burbank Airport will try to reduce average noise levels in all surrounding residential areas to below 65 decibels.
The article reports that Burbank Airport's Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority has passed a resolution to reduce average noise levels in all surrounding residential areas to below 65 decibels. Meeting this goal by 2015 will mean soundproofing homes and further limiting louder jets from flying at the airport. The airport has received $22-million for soundproofing in the past.
PUBLICATION: Los Angeles Times
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Part B; Page 1; Metro Desk
BYLINE: David Reyes
DATELINE: Orange County, California
The Los Angeles Times reports that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently addressed concerns over increasing noise in previously unaffected areas in Orange County, California. Residents also worry that a new airport at El Toro could make the noise problems even worse. FAA officials claimed that no flight paths, which take most jets over Orange County at 15,000 feet, have changed. The FAA would not comment on its opinion regarding a possible commercial airport at El Toro before Orange County supervisors complete a master proposal.
The article reports that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) sent their top regional administrator to a public meeting in Orange County, California to address concerns over increasing noise. Residents, who were packed in at the meeting, say that since the military has vacated the former El Toro Marines Base, noise has become a problem in previously unaffected neighborhoods. They also worry that a new airport at El Toro could make the noise problems even worse, and one residents asked "Why can't you make your decision now, saving us millions of dollars in hearings, legal fees and planning ?"
The article noted that the FAA official claimed that no flight paths, which take most jets over Orange County at 15,000 feet, have changed. He suggested that aircraft landing at John Wayne Airport may be using more of the former base's airspace to shave a short distance off of their trip; when the base was under military use, the airspace was strictly regulated. He also said that summer heat -- which makes it harder for jets to climb -- and more open windows could contribute to an increase in perceived noise. He said he would send staff to neighborhoods to monitor jets that stray from their paths, if he had to.
The article also notes that the FAA would not comment on its opinion regarding a possible commercial airport at El Toro. They say Orange County must complete a master plan for El Toro before the FAA will hold hearings.
PUBLICATION: Nottingham Evening Post
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Business & Employment: Retailing - Markets, Pg.11
BYLINE: Sean Kirby
DATELINE: Nottingham, United Kingdom
The Nottingham Evening Post reports that an indoor market in Nottingham, United Kingdom is undergoing a 100,000-GBP construction project that stops during the day to avoid bothering shoppers, but assaults residents with noise in the early morning, in the evening, and on weekends. City council wants an investigation into noise levels, but says "all we can do is ask residents to be patient...."
The article reports that an indoor market in Nottingham, United Kingdom is undergoing a 100,000-GBP construction project that is driving residents crazy. While the construction stops during the day to avoid bothering shoppers, residents are assaulted with noise in the early morning, in the evening, and on weekends. One resident said "The owners are looking after their tenants in the shopping centre but we've never been consulted."
The article notes that while city council has requested an investigation into noise levels, it says "all we can do is ask residents to be patient and understand there is a balance to be struck between their comfort, public safety and [this] necessary development" project.
PUBLICATION: The Press
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: News; National; Pg. 6; Regional News
BYLINE: Campbell Gerard
DATELINE: West Melton, New Zealand
The Press reports that an army weapons range in West Melton, New Zealand will receive trees and 3-meter as part of a $1-million upgrade to address residents' safety and noise concerns. Most residents were happy with the army's efforts, and thought that safety issues were well addressed, but they still worried about noise.
The article reports that an army weapons range in West Melton, New Zealand will receive trees and 3-meter as part of a $1-million upgrade to address residents' safety and noise concerns. The upgrade will allow grenade and mortar testing.
The article noted that while most residents were happy with the army's efforts, and thought that safety issues were well addressed, they still worried about noise. The army has invited residents to observe the site when the range is operational, and will give a progress report soon.
PUBLICATION: The Scotsman
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 8
BYLINE: Stephen Breen
DATELINE: Scotland
The Scotsman reports that a Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID) study has found that 80% of young people don't worry about their hearing, although half of them have trouble listening to loud music. RNID has started a Safer Sound campaign to encourage people to protect their hearing; the campaign is encouraged by a Norway study which found a 50% reduction in hearing problems after a seven-year public-awareness campaign.
The article reports that a Royal National Institute for Deaf People (RNID) study has found that 80% of young people don't worry about their hearing, although half of them have trouble listening to loud music. Reports of tinnitus is up three-fold from the 1980s, partly due to the ability to crank the volume on digital music without distortion.
The article notes that RNID has started a Safer Sound campaign, backed by several well-known DJs, to encourage people to protect their hearing. The campaign is encouraged by numbers from a Norway study, which found a 50% reduction in hearing problems among young people after a seven-year public-awareness campaign against hearing loss.
The article goes on to say that recommendations for avoiding hearing loss includes wearing ear protection, taking breaks from loud music, and not standing directly in front of speakers.
PUBLICATION: The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News
DATE: August 3, 1999
SECTION: Health & Medicine; Pg. E5
BYLINE: Michael Woods Toledo Blade
DATELINE: Bar Harbor, Maine
The Stuart News/Port St. Lucie News reports that although loud noise undoubtedly plays a role in hearing loss, scientists are discovering that genetic predisposition plays a large part as well.
The article reports that although loud noise undoubtedly plays a role in hearing loss, scientists are discovering that genetic predisposition plays a large part as well. Over 60 genes involved in childhood deafness have been discovered in recent years, and many of them can play a part in progressive hearing loss in adults.
The article notes that the research may lead to some drugs that help necessary genes to work better, or simple strategies for helping people most at-risk avoid loud noise.
PUBLICATION: The Tulsa World
DATE: August 3, 1999
DATELINE: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
The Tulsa World reports that the Oklahoma Transportation Commission has approved a 1,300-foot, $250,000 noise wall along a section of Interstate 44. The commission originally considered the wall as part of a 1990 highway contract. "Changes in the operation" of the road, as well as new noise-dampening materials have now made a noise wall possible.
The article reports that the Oklahoma Transportation Commission has approved a 1,300-foot, $250,000 noise wall along a section of Interstate 44. The commission had previously said the wall was not feasible, because of drainage and utility problems.
The article notes that the commission originally considered the wall as part of a 1990 highway contract. "Changes in the operation" of the road, as well as new noise-dampening materials have now made a noise wall possible. Lightweight materials will be mounted onto the existing retaining wall. An official said "Typically, we would not go back this far along in the process, but we [had] said it was needed," when we originally reconstructed the highway.
PUBLICATION: The Atlanta Journal and Constitution
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Business Horizon; Pg. 1E
BYLINE: Ben Smith III
DATELINE: Atlanta, Georgia
The Atlanta Journal and Constitution reports that a plan to rezone 3.5 acres at 765-acre Dekalb-Peachtree Airport in Atlanta, Georgia for a new corporate hangar is being vehemently opposed by residents, saying they want no more jet traffic at the airport: already Georgia's second largest. An active community group wants to prevent all expansion at the airport.
The article reports that a plan to rezone 3.5 acres at 765-acre Dekalb-Peachtree Airport in Atlanta, Georgia for a new corporate hangar is being vehemently opposed by residents. They will likely attend a County Commission meeting tonight, saying that they want no more jet traffic at the airport: already Georgia's second largest with 25 large, and 90 smaller, hangars.
The article notes that an active community group, PDK Watch, "steadfastly believes that some county officials and the Federal Aviation Administration are quietly, gradually seeking to transform DeKalb-Peachtree Airport into" a facility that will rival the state's largest, which is five times as large. Some officials find the idea laughable, and "accuse PDK Watch of misleading and scaring neighborhood residents to further a quixotic goal of shutting the airport down."
The article goes on to say that County officials are planning to pass an ordinance "to forbid regularly scheduled passenger and cargo planes." The FAA does not allow the airport to limit aircraft on that basis, but the County is hoping that a rule in the form of an ordinance will hold.
PUBLICATION: Aviation Week and Space Technology
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Airport Congestion; Vol. 151, No. 5; Pg. 46
BYLINE: Geoffrey Thomas
DATELINE: Perth, Australia
Aviation Week and Space Technology reports that Sydney, Australia's Kingsford Smith Airport (KSA) is facing inefficiency and safety problems due in large part to noise restrictions. Regulations which encourage the frequent switching of runways to spread noise is "tiring, demoralizing and overwhelming [to] air traffic controllers." Pilots are often asked to land on runways against high winds, even when safer runways are available, for the sake of noise reduction. Flight-paths are often restricted in an attempt to reduce noise, which pilots say are futile and wasteful. Some successful noise-regulation measures have included maximization of flight-time over water, and a night curfew on passenger jets.
The article reports that Sydney, Australia's Kingsford Smith Airport (KSA) is facing inefficiency and safety problems due in large part to noise restrictions, and runway layout. Voter concern over noise causes many politicians to be in favor of noise regulation.
The article notes that KSA "serves 53 international, national and regional carriers," handling 45% of Australia's flights while being located on the smallest section of land of all the country's major airports. While KSA is smaller than many international airports in terms of passenger volume, the predominance of small airplanes makes it larger in terms of aircraft movements: ranking 47th in the world slightly below New York City's JFK (36th).
The article goes on to say that noise regulations, which encourage air traffic controllers to spread noise by frequently switching runway usage. Australia's Bureau of Air Safety Investigation has said that "constant juggling of runways was tiring, demoralizing and overwhelming [to] air traffic controllers."
The article notes that in the past 25 years, several strategies have tried (and failed) to address the dwindling capacity of KSA, which will reach its maximum next year. In 1973, a new airport site was selected, but eventually scrapped because of public outcry over noise. A parallel runway at Sydney was waiting for approval for nine years, before being scrapped; it was finally resuscitated six years later, though the runway has not significantly improved noise problems. Even while a $1.32-billion renovation plan is underway, current runway usage is being capped at 2/3 of their design capacity.
The article notes that pilots are often asked to land on runways against high winds, even when safer runways are available, for the sake of noise reduction. The industry regulator who set this policy say that pilots must reject a designated runway if they feel it is unsafe; pilots say that is unfair, since rejecting the runway could delay their landing by 30 minutes and disrupt their airline's schedule.
The article also notes that flight-paths are often restricted in an attempt to reduce noise. Pilots say that making planes wait to turn wastes fuel and doesn't reduce noise. Additionally, some approach paths designed to cut noise do not follow the traditional method of "keeping aircraft flying as high on approach [and using] a steep descent to minimize" noise; instead, "some aircraft will follow tracks to touchdown of as long as 40 mi. at or below the 8,000-ft. level."
The article goes on to say that some runways which cross each other are used simultaneously in an attempt to spread noise; this usage has cause "several near-collisions when aircraft taxied over [one runway] while [it] was in operation."
The article notes several apparently successful noise-regulation measures. Flight paths also maximize flight time over water. A curfew on night-flights for passenger jets keep the skies quieter between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. Also, a "$480-million rail link to Sydney's downtown will be the first of its kind in Australia when it opens next year."
PUBLICATION: Capital
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Arundel; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Kevin Kaley
DATELINE: Annapolis, Maryland
The Capital reports that the City Council Public Safety Committee in Annapolis, Maryland has recommended changes to a newly revised public nuisance law. Revisions were meant to specify offenses in more detail than state laws.
The article notes that in the original revisions, "yelling, shouting, hooting, making rude remarks, whistling or singing on or near the public streets, so as to unreasonably disturb the peace," were forbidden. After questions of whether those details were too specific, the wording was changed to "the presence of noise of sufficient loudness, character and duration which may unreasonably interfere with the proper enjoyment of property or with any lawful business or activity. Public disturbance noise shall include, but not be limited to, amplified music; yelling, shouting and rude remarks on public streets and other public places; and frequent, repetitive sounds from engines or motor vehicles."
The article notes that police convinced the council to retract a requirement for decibel-meter readings; officers prefer the criterion of being able to hear a noise at fifty feet.
PUBLICATION: The Evening Standard
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: News; Local; Pg. 1
BYLINE: Myers John
DATELINE: Palmerston, New Zealand
The Evening Standard reports that the planning commission in Palmerston, New Zealand may limit noise from aircraft engine testing. The limits wouldn't go into effect until January of 2001. The issue became controversial when a particular airline began routinely servicing -- and testing -- engines at night; that airline has since moved its servicing operation.
The article reports that the planning commission in Palmerston, New Zealand is holding a public hearing this week on a variation to the district's master plan that would limit noise from aircraft engine testing. Palmerston North Airport could have much lower noise-limits for engine testing if the variation passes. The limits wouldn't go into effect until January of 2001.
The article notes that recent controversy over late-night engine testing at the airport has been partially alleviated by an airline reorganization. The airline in question was having Saab engines serviced at the airport; noise from testing resulted each time an engine was serviced when the engine was tested to assure safe performance. They have since moved their servicing operation to another airport. The issue has brought 130 written comments to the council.
PUBLICATION: Mainichi Daily News
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Page 12; Domestic
DATELINE: Atsugi, Kanagawa, Japan
The Mainichi Daily News reports that the Tokyo High Court ruled that the government must pay 170 million yen to residents living near the U.S. Asugi Naval Air Facility who have been disturbed by aircraft noise. All night-flights will be allowed to continue, although even the lower courts were considering a ban on some flights. The residents will not appeal the ruling.
The article reports that the Tokyo High Court ruled that the government must pay 170 million yen to residents living near the U.S. Asugi Naval Air Facility who have been disturbed by aircraft noise. The ruling grants the money to 134 residents, but denies the residents' request for a ban on night flights.
The article notes that the residents have decided not to appeal. Although the monetary settlement was granted, plaintiffs said that even the lower courts agreed to ban some flights by Self Defense Forces. They felt that the denial of a ban was a major loss.
PUBLICATION: Nation's Restaurant News
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: News ; Pg. 8
BYLINE: Robin Lee Allen
DATELINE: Newport, Rhode Island
The Nation's Restaurant News reports that the hospitality industry in Newport, Rhode Island is working with local officials and police to reduce noise and nuisance problems. A consultant was hired by the Rhode Island Hospitality and Tourism Association (RIHTA), and has proposed changes including later closing times -- to allow intoxicated patrons to order food and use the bathroom before hitting the streets -- and the informal training and certification of doormen. Tourism promotions will also include information on penalties for nuisance behavior in an attempt to curb inappropriate actions by visitors.
The article notes that although Newport's problems are typical of a tourist town, the major restaurant districts are located near residences, so "they affect residents, who get mental and scream and yell at city council meetings."
PUBLICATION: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. A-1, Close Encounters
BYLINE: Jan Ackerman
DATELINE: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reports that residents of Jefferson Hills, Pennsylvania are upset about a highway construction project that promises to subject them to daily dynamite blasts for ten months. Currently, construction-workers' shifts end begin at 6 a.m. and end at midnight, but soon those hours may be extended until 4:30 a.m. The blasting and construction is part of a project to create a 65-mile toll highway between Pittsburgh and Interstate highways in West Virginia.
The article notes that residents want the construction company to follow the local noise ordinance, which limits noise to between 7 a.m. and 9 p.m., six days a week. When the borough tried to force construction to stop at 9 p.m., they accepted a compromise that required the company to disconnect noisy backup warning devices after 9 p.m. in favor of silent strobe lights. The question of whether this was legal, or safe, was not addressed in the article.
The article notes that the construction company also wants the borough to rezone an 8-acre section of land that would allow them to build an industrial complex near the highway. Residents oppose the idea, in part because a proposed salt-dome at the complex would inevitably cause noise from large salt-trucks loading up in the early morning hours during the winter. A recent hearing -- attended by 50 residents -- was postponed since no one from the turnpike commission attended to argue their side.
The article notes that residents have been circulating a petition to require enforcement of the local noise ordinance and opposing the industrial park. Many homes have gone up for sale since the project began.
The article notes that snakes -- including poisonous copperheads -- are being disturbed by the blasting. Also, gray herons who nest nearby will have their habitat destroyed. The construction is near Peters Creek, which may suffer environmental damage from the construction. Trees, which residents thought would be left untouched to provide a noise buffer, have been removed.
The article notes that the construction company references a length environmental impact study. It considered "issues such as mine subsidence, impact on wetlands and the preservation of archaeological spots."
The article notes that this piece of the project is 17 miles long and will cost $577-million.
PUBLICATION: The San Diego Union-Tribune
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Opinion Pg. B-7
BYLINE: James S. Caldwell, Doreen Brown, Chuck LeMenager, Mike Plant, Brian Bentler
DATELINE: San Diego, California
The San Diego Union-Tribune prints several letters to the editor on the issue of noise from Miramar Military Base. Some residents criticized city officials for dumping a new Port District administrator's ideas for not following the proper chain of command. Others criticized the relocation of flight paths that would put noise control ahead of safety, or shift noise to a more rural area.
"Give Dennis Bouey a chance to solve airport problem
Re: "Airport plan is blown off course" (A-1, July 28):
It's strange. Dennis Bouey comes to town as the new Port District administrator with ideas and enthusiasm. But when he submits a plan to find a new airport, he is immediately jumped on by Art Madrid, the chairman of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), that tired old unelected group that has been sitting on this airport problem for decades.
Madrid says, "We are the ones who make the recommendations." Really? Then where are your recommendations on the airport?
Bouey says state law gives him authority to operate an airport off tidelands. But state Sen. Steve Peace said it was never his intent for the port to operate an airport outside its current boundaries. Pardon me, but Peace's intent is irrelevant. What does the duly enacted law state?
A new airport will never come about with action by a committee, not SANDAG and not a joint powers authority. The only reason we reached the moon was because of the action of John F. Kennedy, who said we were going to the moon and we were going to do it in 10 years.
How about the Port District and SANDAG forgetting about who is supposed to do what for a while and find a way to work with this man with ideas."
JAMES S. CALDWELL San Diego
"I was so happy to read that Bouey was trying to take this 50-year-old airport problem and find a solution. Here was a man with a new perspective, the expertise and a desire to solve a festering issue.
Why should I be surprised when the political leaders of the little fiefdoms in this county rise up and say "Hold it, buster, you didn't say, 'Simon says, may I?' "
Everything that happens in this county affects the whole county, not just the city of San Diego, or El Cajon or La Mesa. But like the neighborhood bully, each little chief says, "You're the new kid on the block, you have to fight me first!"
I am aware that San Diego has coveted the money from the airport and the port, but it is not San Diego's money. It belongs to the county. The city's small-minded selfishness is appalling! "If you don't play by my rules, you can't play at all" is so childish.
It is time for Mayor Susan Golding, Peace and Madrid to step aside and let someone with the knowledge to accomplish the task do the job. Bouey is right and we all know it."
DOREEN BROWN Bonita
"New Miramar flight patterns stir up opposition
Re: "New routes proposed for noisy copters" (B-1, July 29):
The flight path proposed for Marine helicopters by MARCH activists raises serious safety concerns for those who fly from the Ramona and Gillespie airports. The proposed route would most certainly conflict with those two airports' flight activities.
As an active pilot who has been flying out of Ramona for more than 13 years, I've seen air traffic grow there dramatically from less than 50,000 or so operations per year to more than 125,000. Heavily loaded firefighting air tankers climb out of Ramona into the area designated by MARCH. Many inexperienced student pilots from Gillespie fly the corridor over Lake San Vicente to practice landings and takeoffs at Ramona.
I was pleased that Maj. Gen. Michael DeLong, commander of the 3rd Marine Air Wing, stated, "Safety, not noise abatement, will be the primary consideration of the Marines as they study possible new flight paths for helicopters flying from Miramar." He has my support for safety first, as well as that of most other general aviation pilots."
CHUCK LeMENAGER Ramona
"The proposal to shift the Marine helicopter route from the I-15 corridor to the east is one of which Lewis Carrol would certainly be proud. Only the March Hare could make sense of switching the noise from the skies above the din of an eight-lane freeway to a pastoral, ecologically sensitive valley populated by farmers, secluded residential neighborhoods and rare and endangered animal species.
Whatever happened to personal responsibility? The people who purchased homes along I-15 did so with the knowledge that traffic, noise and congestion would be part of the mix. The helicopters might be a recent factor, but what of the screaming Navy fighter planes that preceded them?
As for the people to the east, we gave up the ease of freeway access and down-the-block convenience stores for the piece and quiet of rural living. Helicopters never were part of the equation.
One would hope that the Marines have had enough of MARCH, and will allow the group to drink its own bitter tea. Leave the San Pasqual Valley in peace -- and quiet. It's why we came here in the first place."
MIKE PLANT Rancho San Pasqual
Instead of one flight path, why not have 15? Rotate them on a daily basis, randomly, so no one gets too much noise any particular week.
BRIAN BENTLER San Diego
PUBLICATION: South China Morning Post
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 6
BYLINE: Antoine So
DATELINE: Sham Tseng, China
The South China Morning Post reports that protesters in Sham Tseng, China staged a silent sit-in to protest aircraft noise near their homes. Protesters want a noise law limiting aircraft noise in certain districts, but officials say that an environmental impact conducted before a second runway was added showed acceptable noise levels.
The article reports that protesters in Sham Tseng, China staged a silent sit-in to protest aircraft noise near their homes. They said that over 1 million people are affected, and says that aircraft flightpaths designed to avoid residential areas are probably only temporary.
The article notes that protesters want a noise law limiting aircraft noise in certain districts, as in California, U.S.A. A second runway opened in May at Chek Lap Kok Airport, and officials say that an environmental impact conducted before then showed acceptable noise levels.
PUBLICATION: Sun-Sentinel
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Jeremy Milarsky
DATELINE: North Lauderdale, Florida
The Sun-Sentinel reports that the Sawgrass Expressway, in North Lauderdale, Florida has gone from a seldom-used highway dubbed "the road to nowhere" in 1986 to a noisy expressway that is increasingly disturbing to rural residents. Some residents are particularly upset by noise from a two month resurfacing project, while others moved here for a country life that they feel is now disrupted.
The article reports that the Sawgrass Expressway, in North Lauderdale, Florida has gone from a seldom-used highway dubbed "the road to nowhere" in 1986 to a noisy expressway that is increasingly disturbing to rural residents. Some residents believe that the expressway was built closer to their property than to another community because they aren't as wealthy.
The article notes that a current resurfacing project along 14 miles of the highway will cost $5.4-million. Noise from the two month project will continue disturbing residents, including one resident whose six horses get spooked every time loud machinery starts up. She wants to be reimbursed for moving her barn to the opposite side of her property. Other residents are upset because they moved here for a country life that they feel is now disrupted.
The article notes that state officials know many residents by name because of the conflict, but say there isn't much they can do since they are "charged with the maintenance of the expressway, the grass, and the tree-trimming of the shoulder." A future widening project may bring with it noise walls to protect residents from noise.
PUBLICATION: The Tampa Tribune
DATE: August 2, 1999
SECTION: Florida/Metro, Pg. 1
BYLINE: Sarah Anchors
DATELINE: Ybor, Florida
The Tampa Tribune reports that a proposed new ordinance in Ybor, Florida will limit noise levels in residential areas to 55 decibels at the listener's property line, and downtown businesses will be limited to 85 decibels at their property line. Critics say that bars are only part of the problem, and note that many noisemakers are exempt.
The article reports that a proposed new ordinance will limit noise levels in residential areas of Ybor, Florida to 55 decibels at the listener's property line, and downtown businesses will be limited to 85 decibels at their property line. Club owners say that they are unfairly targeted, since less than 10% of the 200 noise complaints in the community this year have been about bar noise.
The article notes that the ordinance will not cover construction or home appliances that caused most noise complaints. Although liquor licenses have already set an 85-decibel limit for clubs, police have not enforced it because only licenses issued before a certain date. One major noise producer is a new roller coaster at Busch Gardens, although the park is exempt; officials there claim that they are not violating the noise limits anyway.
PUBLICATION: Evening Herald
DATE: August 7, 1999
SECTION: Pg.4
DATELINE: Plympton St. Maurice, United Kingdom
The Evening Herald reports that a pub manager in Plympton St. Maurice was fined 250 pounds for each of four noise violations after a noise abatement notice was served. The man admitted to the violations, but said the brewery was supposed to soundproof the walls.
The article reports that a pub manager in Plympton St. Maurice was fined 250 pounds for each of four noise violations. The violations came after a noise abatement notice was served on him after neighbors complained about loud bands.
The article notes that he booked the bands, although he says that the brewery had claimed it would soundproof the walls and did not. The bands have stopped and the pub has now been sold, leaving him without a job.
PUBLICATION: The Hartford Courant
DATE: August 7, 1999
SECTION: Town News; Pg. B3
BYLINE: Paul H. Johnson
DATELINE: Simsbury, Connecticut
The Hartford Courant reports that Simsbury, Connecticut officials are working with police to develop a local noise ordinance that would fine violators $50.
The article reports that Simsbury, Connecticut officials are working with police to develop a local noise ordinance. The ordinance would levy a $50 fine on anyone who exceeded a noise level soon to be set by officials. Special event coordinators could obtain variances in special cases.
The article notes that residents have been complaining about loud parties, garage bands, and bad mufflers. Officials note that they will encourage residents to work out disputes on their own, but an ordinance would serve as a backup.
PUBLICATION: The Plain Dealer
DATE: August 7, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Karen Henderson
DATELINE: Lorain County, Ohio
The Plain Dealer reports that residents and officials from several communities in Lorain County, Ohio gathered at a forum to discuss the problem of increased rail traffic. Residents were upset about noise from trains, but officials said that whistles shouldn't be quieted until safety can be improved: in part by building overpasses. Ohio Rail Development Commission officials suggested continued pressure on the transportation department to fight for the overpasses: an approach that worked in the Cleveland area.
The article reports that residents and officials from several communities in Lorain County, Ohio gathered at a forum to discuss the problem of increased rail traffic. Ohio Rail Development Commission (ORDC) officials said that overpasses would be one solution, although the transportation department doesn't have enough money to build all of the needed $8-million structures all at once.
The article noted that residents were upset about noise from trains, but officials said that whistles shouldn't be quieted until safety can be improved: in part by building overpasses that will reduce the chances of an automobile/train collision. Officials also worry that communities who are cut off by trains for hours at a time could experience a tragedy if emergency vehicles needed to get through and couldn't. Communities who can offer some funds to help build overpasses will stand a better chance of getting overpasses soon.
The article notes that ORDC officials suggested continued pressure -- from residents and elected officials -- on the transportation department to fight for the overpasses; Cleveland area residents led a successful campaign to freeze the amount of rail traffic in their area after Conrail was bought out last year. As it stands now, Lorain County may see even more rail traffic as time goes on.
PUBLICATION: Portland Press Herald
DATE: August 7, 1999
SECTION: Coast & State, Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Dennis Hoey
DATELINE: Bath, Maine
The Portland Press Herald reports that Bath, Maine residents have thanked Bath Iron Works (BIW) for keeping the noise down of late, but worry that upcoming pile driving in the river will be too loud. BIW has taken many noise-reduction steps to keep nighttime noise down in the past month.
The article reports that Bath, Maine residents have thanked Bath Iron Works (BIW) for keeping the noise down of late, but worry that upcoming pile driving in the river will be too loud. BIW says that it must work around the clock to drive piles -- although residents have asked for restriction of nighttime pile driving -- to build their ship-assembling platform on schedule and finish their current contracts.
The article notes that BIW has taken many noise-reduction steps to keep nighttime noise down in the past month. They have: "installed mufflers on cranes, a diesel pump, an engine and a generator, installed wood on a crane boom to block noise caused by cables striking metal, limited tugboat activity at night, added another dredging scow during the day to minimize the need to dredge the river bottom at night, covered dive compressors with blankets to reduce noise, removed back-up beepers on trucks, instead using people to direct the truck driver, and installed a 24--hour" complaint hotline staffed by a live person.
PUBLICATION: The Times-Picayune
DATE: August 7, 1999
SECTION: Metro; Pg. B1
BYLINE: Kenner Bureau
The Times-Picayune reports that a second hearing on airport noise is scheduled for Tuesday in New Orleans, after residents said they didn't have enough advance warning about the first one in May. The hearing will present information on a current study at New Orleans International Airport and highlight noise-reduction efforts at other airports.
The article reports that a second hearing on airport noise is scheduled for Tuesday in New Orleans, after residents said they didn't have enough advance warning about the first one in May. The hearing will present information on a current study on airport noise in neighborhoods surrounding New Orleans International Airport, and will allow the public to voice its concerns. Noise-reduction efforts at other airports will also be highlighted.
The article goes on to say that the study will take another year to complete, and public hearings will be held periodically along the way.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: August 7, 1999
SECTION: News; Pg. 5; Zone: Nw
BYLINE: Mark R. Madler
DATELINE: McHenry County, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that the McHenry County, Illinois Planning Department questioned the methods used to evaluate noise from a proposed power plant near Woodstock. According to a consultant, noise would be well below local limits. Officials were wary after learning that no other alternatives were considered, other than putting turbines in the barn.
The article reports that the McHenry County, Illinois Planning Department questioned the methods used by a consultant to evaluate noise from a proposed power plant near Woodstock. The consultant said that the power plant -- which would be disguised as a barn to blend in with the rural landscape -- would produce less than 42 decibels of noise.
The article notes that planning department officials were wary of the consultant after learning that no other alternatives were considered, other than putting turbines in the barn. The 42 decibels of noise would be well below the 51 decibel noise standard at night and the higher limit during the day.
PUBLICATION: The Associated Press State & Local Wire
DATE: August 6, 1999
SECTION: State And Regional
DATELINE: Cleveland, Ohio
The Associated Press State & Local Wire reports that as of January 1st, boat motorists with motors louder than 90 decibels will be given with a $100-$1,000 fine and up to six months in jail. Boaters with loud motors will be ordered to put on mufflers that cost from $400-$800.
The article reports that as of January 1st, boat motorists with motors louder than 90 decibels -- or louder than 75 decibels from shore -- will be charged with a $100 fine. Second-time offenders will receive a $1,000 fine. The first offense would be considered a minor misdemeanor, and subsequent offenses would be considered first-degree misdemeanors and could bring jail terms of up to 6 months in jail.
The article notes that boaters with loud motors will be ordered to put on mufflers that cost from $400-$800. Officers noted that boat motors are seldom louder than 90 decibels when they are purchased, unless they are special high-performance models.
PUBLICATION: City News Service
DATE: August 6, 1999
DATELINE: Los Angeles, California
The City News Service reports that a $32.3-million grant for improvements at California airports was announced today by the Clinton administration. $17.3-million will be used for noise mitigation around Los Angeles International Airport.
The article reports that a $32.3-million grant for improvements at California airports was announced today by the Clinton administration. $17.3-million will be used for noise mitigation at 860 homes in Inglewood: a community affected by noise from Los Angeles International Airport.
The article notes that Inglewood officials are pleased with the grant, but still oppose expansion at the airport.
PUBLICATION: The Herald
DATE: August 6, 1999
SECTION: Pg. 13
BYLINE: Bruce Mckain
DATELINE: Glasgow, Scotland
The Herald reports that a claim from a former soldier in Scotland, who says his 53% hearing loss is due to excessive noise he was subjected to in the army, has been rejected. Since his army discharge was in 1990, the judge decided he had waited too long beyond the usual three-year period.
The article reports that a claim from a former soldier in Scotland, who says his 53% hearing loss is due to excessive noise he was subjected to in the army, has been rejected. The defense argued that the army didn't cause the damage, and even if it did the soldier waited too long to file a claim.
The article notes that a doctor testified that there was no neurological cause for the hearing loss, meaning that there was a "possibility... that the noise exposure he suffered during his Army service may be responsible for part or all of his hearing impairment." Nevertheless, since his army discharge was in 1990, the judge decided he had waited too long beyond the usual three-year period.
PUBLICATION: Orlando Business Journal
DATE: August 6, 1999
SECTION: Vol 16; No 10; Pg 1
BYLINE: Alan Byrd
DATELINE: Orlando, Florida
The Orlando Business Journal reports that Universal Studios may be finalizing development plans for part of a 2,000-acre property in the area, though they say they have submitted no development plans. They asked an Orange County development committee to revise their minutes, which suggested that Universal had submitted some form of development plans. Universal has generated noise complaints in the past, and has attempted to mitigate the noise in question.
The article reports that Universal Studios may be finalizing development plans for part of a 2,000-acre property in the area. Universal maintains that it has submitted no development plans, and wants the Orange County Development Review Committee to 'revise' the minutes of a meeting that suggested otherwise.
The article noted that the new area may consist of a theme park, an entertainment complex or another tourism-related project. Minutes of a meeting of the development committee included a suggestion that "the attraction parcel ... be swapped with the golf and timeshare parcel ... to eliminate compatibility issues, lighting and noise," suggesting more that Universal had submitted some form of development plans.
The article goes on to say that Universal has generated noise complaints in the past about their regular fireworks explosions; fortunately for them, the city's noise ordinance -- drafted with their help -- measures noise in five minute increments which essentially exempts the instantaneous noise of fireworks. Noise complaints generated by a recently-constructed roller coaster caused Universal to build a 55-foot wall to block the noise. In the letter that Universal wrote to the development committee, it noted that it had considered creating a substantial forested buffer between any new attraction and residences.
PUBLICATION: Portland Press Herald
DATE: August 6, 1999
SECTION: York County & State, Pg. 2B, Dispatches
DATELINE: Portland, Maine
The Portland Press Herald reports that in Old Orchard Beach, Maine, the Salvation Army has been cited with a noise violation. The group was warned earlier this week, but noise levels from its two-week annual meeting continued to exceed local limits.
The article reports on several local happenings, including one that was noise-related. In Old Orchard Beach, Maine, the Salvation Army has been cited with a noise violation. The organization holds a two-week meeting each summer that includes concerts, meetings, and speakers.
The article notes that the group was warned earlier this week, but noise levels still exceeded local limits. A complaint from last year is still pending in court.
PUBLICATION: Sun-Sentinel
DATE: August 6, 1999
SECTION: Local, Pg. 1B
BYLINE: Stella M. Chbavez
DATELINE: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
ACTIVISTS, INDIVIDUALS, AND GROUPS MENTIONED: Robert Fischer, president of the homeowners association of Waters Bend
The Sun-Sentinel reports that residents along the Florida Turnpike near Fort Lauderdale want a noise wall to be built when the turnpike is expanded, but transportation officials say that the population isn't dense enough to warrant a wall. Residents along U.S. 441, who will be getting sound walls, don't want them. They fear that the ugly walls will detract from property values.
The article reports that residents along the Florida Turnpike near Fort Lauderdale want a noise wall to be built when the turnpike is expanded, but transportation officials say that the population isn't dense enough to warrant a wall. Locals say that even if an 18-foot wall can't be built, an 8-foot wall should be built on top of landscaping fill; they also say that all dwellings near the turnpike -- not just those along the road -- should be counted as potential benefactors of a noise wall. Officials say residents further from the road have the noise abated by those closer to the road.
The article goes on to say that residents along U.S. 441, who will be getting sound walls, don't want them. They fear that the ugly walls will detract from property values, and are asking for shorter walls on top of landscaped berms -- similar to what Turnpike neighbors want -- instead of 18-foot walls.
PUBLICATION: Chicago Tribune
DATE: August 6, 1999
SECTION: Metro Chicago; Pg. 1; Zone: N
BYLINE: Cornelia Grumman
DATELINE: Chicago, Illinois
The Chicago Tribune reports that for the first time, Illinois' FIRST program will be used to help pay for a noise wall along a section of road that is not undergoing expansion. The 18-foot wall will cost $1-million to $1.5-million per mile, and the local communities will be expected to put up matching funds for the project. The communities have already put up $100,000 collectively to pay for a study to determine the details of the wall.
The article reports that for the first time, Illinois' FIRST program will be used to help pay for a noise wall along a section of road that is not undergoing expansion. 159 residents living along Chicago's Edens Expressway signed a petition for a noise wall as early as 1994, but the state has traditionally refused to fund noise mitigation separately from road expansion projects.
The article notes that the 18-foot wall will cost $1-million to $1.5-million per mile, and the local communities will be expected to put up matching funds for the project; after they approve their funds, they can apply to the state for the rest. Construction could begin in 2001. At least one of three communities that will benefit from the wall have plans to make it aesthetically pleasing -- using a brick-colored dye and 'artistic imprints' -- to break the monotony.
The article goes on to say that many at the state transportation department are 'amazed' by people who build up to the road and then complain about noise.
The article notes that the communities have already put up $100,000 collectively to pay for a study to determine the details of the wall. The study is required before the towns apply for the state money. The state noise limit is 67 decibels, and the current decibel levels in the communities in question range from 75-77.
Previous week: July 25, 1999
Next week: August 8, 1999
Aircraft Noise
Amplified Noise
Effects on Wildlife/Animals
Construction Noise
Firing Ranges
Health Effects
Home Equipment and Appliances
Industrial/Manufacturing
International News
Environmental Justice
Land Use and Noise
Lawsuits
Civil Liberty Issues
Miscellaneous Noise Stories
Noise Ordinances
Noise Organizations Mentioned
Outdoor Events
Noise in Our National Parks/Natural Areas
Regulation
Residential and Community Noise
Snowmobile and ATV Noise
Research and Studies
Technological Solutions to Noise
Transportation Related Noise
Violence and Noise
Watercraft Noise
Workplace Noise
Chronological Index
Geographical Index